Literature DB >> 23389066

Evaluation of transvaginal peritoneal surgery in young female patients.

Masaaki Tanaka1, Tetsuya Sagawa, Rena Yamazaki, Subaru Myojo, Satoshi Dohi, Masaki Inoue.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The transvaginal approach is being used for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), and reports of the clinical use of transvaginal NOTES have increased rapidly. However, hasty use of a transvaginal route may cause unexpected complications. Infertility or dyspareunia after transvaginal NOTES in young women is one of the most important issues to be resolved. The purpose of this study was to assess long-term complications, including infertility and dyspareunia, after transvaginal peritoneal surgery.
METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was sent to 73 young patients who had undergone ovarian cystectomy using a transvaginal approach from 2003 to 2011. The questionnaire contained 15 questions; 6 dealt with fertility, and 8 dealt with discomfort after surgery. A 5-point scale was used to evaluate patients' overall satisfaction with surgery.
RESULTS: Forty-four (60 %) questionnaires were returned. The patients' mean age was 33.0 years, and the mean postoperative follow-up period was 16.5 months. Of responders younger than age 40 years, 24 did not use contraception, and 9 (38 %) conceived. The pregnancy rate among women younger than age 30 years was 60 %. Two (5 %) women reported temporary dyspareunia 1 month after surgery, but none developed permanent dyspareunia. The average patient satisfaction score was 4.12.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence to suggest that transvaginal peritoneal surgery causes infertility or dyspareunia. The majority of patients gave a high evaluation to vaginal ovarian cystectomy, suggesting the usability of a transvaginal approach for intraperitoneal surgery in young premenopausal women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23389066     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2749-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  17 in total

Review 1.  Recurrent pregnancy loss: summary and clinical recommendations.

Authors:  R M Lee; R M Silver
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.303

Review 2.  Laparoendoscopic single-site and natural orifice surgery in gynecology.

Authors:  Pedro F Escobar; David Starks; Amanda Nickles Fader; Michelle Catenacci; Tommaso Falcone
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  The Culdotomy FourS Two U procedure for transvaginal access to the peritoneal cavity.

Authors:  M Tanaka; T Sagawa; M Hashimoto; Y Mizumoto; H Yoshimoto; R Yamazaki; T Kasai; M Inoue
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  How do gynecologists feel about transvaginal NOTES surgery?

Authors:  F Thele; M Zygmunt; A Glitsch; C-D Heidecke; A Schreiber
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 5.  A review of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for intra-abdominal surgery: experimental models, techniques, and applicability to the clinical setting.

Authors:  Eliana Della Flora; Thomas G Wilson; Ian J Martin; Nicholas A O'Rourke; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Age and infertility.

Authors:  J Menken; J Trussell; U Larsen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-09-26       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  An alternative system for transvaginal removal of dermoid cyst and a comparative study with laparoscopy.

Authors:  Masaaki Tanaka; Tetsuya Sagawa; Rena Yamazaki; Subaru Myojo; Satoshi Dohi; Masaki Inoue
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 2.058

8.  Female population perception of conventional laparoscopy, transumbilical LESS, and transvaginal NOTES for cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Pascal Bucher; Sandrine Ostermann; François Pugin; Philippe Morel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  A double-blind randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation for women with chronic pelvic pain.

Authors:  N P Johnson; C M Farquhar; S Crossley; Y Yu; A M Van Peperstraten; M Sprecher; J Suckling
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.531

10.  Ovarian remnant syndrome at the port site.

Authors:  H Albert Chao
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.137

View more
  3 in total

1.  Transvaginal organ extraction: potential for broad clinical application.

Authors:  Garth R Jacobsen; Juan S Barajas-Gamboa; Alisa M Coker; Joslin Cheverie; C Aitor Macias; Bryan J Sandler; Mark A Talamini; Santiago Horgan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Transvaginal Hybrid-NOTES procedures-do they have a negative impact on pregnancy and delivery?

Authors:  Panagiotis Thomaidis; Niklas J Weltermann; Claudia S Seefeldt; Dana C Richards; Axel Sauerwald; Markus M Heiss; Dirk R Bulian
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  What about vaginal extraction of the kidney? results of an online survey.

Authors:  João Ferreira Cabral; Isaac Campos Braga; Frederico Branco; Vitor Cavadas; Avelino Fraga Ferreira; Miguel Silva Ramos
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.