Literature DB >> 23388856

Surgical management of symptomatic Chiari II malformation in infants and children.

S Hassan A Akbari1, David D Limbrick2,3, David H Kim2, Prithvi Narayan4, Jeffrey R Leonard2,3, Matthew D Smyth2,3, Tae Sung Park2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Variation exists in the surgical methods employed for decompression of Chiari II malformation (CIIM), yet an evaluation of these techniques has not been performed. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of bony decompression (cervical laminectomy alone versus suboccipital craniectomy with laminectomy) with or without dural augmentation for the treatment of symptomatic CIIM.
METHODS: Clinical records of children 0-18 years of age who underwent surgical repair of myelomeningocele or CIIM decompression at St. Louis Children's Hospital (SLCH) from 1990-2011 were reviewed. Signs/symptoms prompting decompression, surgical technique, operative parameters, and clinical outcomes were recorded for analysis.
RESULTS: Thirty-three subjects were treated at SLCH for CIIM decompression. Twenty-six subjects underwent bony decompression only (21 cervical laminectomy alone, 5 suboccipital craniectomy + cervical laminectomy) while seven underwent bony decompression with upfront dural augmentation (three cervical laminectomy alone, four suboccipital craniectomy + cervical laminectomy). Median follow up was 5.0 years (range, 3 months-19 years). Symptomatic improvement was noted in 20/33 subjects (60.6%). Sixty-two (61.5%) percent of children who underwent bony decompression had symptomatic improvement, compared with 57.1% of those with upfront dural augmentation (p = 0.37). Estimated blood loss, operative time, and length of perioperative hospital stay appeared lower in the bony decompression group but were not statistically different in this limited cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: The results from this series suggest that bony CIIM decompression via tailored cervical laminectomies alone, without suboccipital craniectomy or upfront dural augmentation, is a reasonable initial management approach for decompression of symptomatic CIIM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brainstem compression; Chiari type II malformation; Decompression; Dural augmentation; Myelomeningocele; Syrinx

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23388856     DOI: 10.1007/s00381-013-2040-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  34 in total

Review 1.  Treatment and management of the Chiari II malformation: an evidence-based review of the literature.

Authors:  R Shane Tubbs; W Jerry Oakes
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Surgical management of Chiari malformation: analysis of 128 cases.

Authors:  Fuyou Guo; Meiyun Wang; Jiang Long; Huaili Wang; Hongwei Sun; Bo Yang; Laijun Song
Journal:  Pediatr Neurosurg       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.162

3.  The Chiari II malformation: Part IV. The hindbrain deformity.

Authors:  T P Naidich; D G McLone; K H Fulling
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Current treatment of Chiari malformations types I and II: A survey of the Pediatric Section of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons.

Authors:  S J Haines; M Berger
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  The old and the new: supratentorial MR findings in Chiari II malformation.

Authors:  Elka Miller; Elysa Widjaja; Susan Blaser; Maureen Dennis; Charles Raybaud
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Experience with surgical decompression of the Arnold-Chiari malformation in young infants with myelomeningocele.

Authors:  T S Park; H J Hoffman; E B Hendrick; R P Humphreys
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Value of treating primary causes of syrinx in scoliosis associated with syringomyelia.

Authors:  Remzi A Ozerdemoglu; Ensor E Transfeldt; Francis Denis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Computed tomographic signs of the Chiari II malformation. Part I: Skull and dural partitions.

Authors:  T P Naidich; R M Pudlowski; J B Naidich; M Gornish; F J Rodriguez
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Preoperative evaluation and surgical management of the Arnold-Chiari II malformation.

Authors:  J L Venes; K L Black; J T Latack
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Central nervous system anomalies associated with meningomyelocele, hydrocephalus, and the Arnold-Chiari malformation: reappraisal of theories regarding the pathogenesis of posterior neural tube closure defects.

Authors:  J N Gilbert; K L Jones; L B Rorke; G F Chernoff; H E James
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  2 in total

1.  Decompression for Chiari malformation type II in individuals with myelomeningocele in the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry.

Authors:  Irene Kim; Betsy Hopson; Inmaculada Aban; Elias B Rizk; Mark S Dias; Robin Bowman; Laurie L Ackerman; Michael D Partington; Heidi Castillo; Jonathan Castillo; Paula R Peterson; Jeffrey P Blount; Brandon G Rocque
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 2.  Pediatric Craniovertebral Junction Surgery.

Authors:  Nobuhito Morota
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 1.742

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.