Literature DB >> 23388632

Impact of deleterious passenger mutations on cancer progression.

Christopher D McFarland1, Kirill S Korolev, Gregory V Kryukov, Shamil R Sunyaev, Leonid A Mirny.   

Abstract

Cancer progression is driven by the accumulation of a small number of genetic alterations. However, these few driver alterations reside in a cancer genome alongside tens of thousands of additional mutations termed passengers. Passengers are widely believed to have no role in cancer, yet many passengers fall within protein-coding genes and other functional elements that can have potentially deleterious effects on cancer cells. Here we investigate the potential of moderately deleterious passengers to accumulate and alter the course of neoplastic progression. Our approach combines evolutionary simulations of cancer progression with an analysis of cancer sequencing data. From simulations, we find that passengers accumulate and largely evade natural selection during progression. Although individually weak, the collective burden of passengers alters the course of progression, leading to several oncological phenomena that are hard to explain with a traditional driver-centric view. We then tested the predictions of our model using cancer genomics data and confirmed that many passengers are likely damaging and have largely evaded negative selection. Finally, we use our model to explore cancer treatments that exploit the load of passengers by either (i) increasing the mutation rate or (ii) exacerbating their deleterious effects. Though both approaches lead to cancer regression, the latter is a more effective therapy. Our results suggest a unique framework for understanding cancer progression as a balance of driver and passenger mutations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23388632      PMCID: PMC3581883          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1213968110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  50 in total

1.  Evolution of resistance during clonal expansion.

Authors:  Yoh Iwasa; Martin A Nowak; Franziska Michor
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Negative clonal selection in tumor evolution.

Authors:  Robert A Beckman; Lawrence A Loeb
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Accelerated evolution and Muller's rachet in endosymbiotic bacteria.

Authors:  N A Moran
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The accumulation of deleterious genes in a population--Muller's Ratchet.

Authors:  J Haigh
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 1.570

5.  The problem of cancer dormancy: understanding the basic mechanisms and identifying therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Julio A Aguirre-Ghiso
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  DNA damage after chemotherapy correlates with tumor response and survival in small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  J M Silva; J M Garcia; G Dominguez; J Silva; R Rodriguez; J L Portero; C Corbacho; M Provencio; P España; F Bonilla
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2000-11-30       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  A comprehensive catalogue of somatic mutations from a human cancer genome.

Authors:  Erin D Pleasance; R Keira Cheetham; Philip J Stephens; David J McBride; Sean J Humphray; Chris D Greenman; Ignacio Varela; Meng-Lay Lin; Gonzalo R Ordóñez; Graham R Bignell; Kai Ye; Julie Alipaz; Markus J Bauer; David Beare; Adam Butler; Richard J Carter; Lina Chen; Anthony J Cox; Sarah Edkins; Paula I Kokko-Gonzales; Niall A Gormley; Russell J Grocock; Christian D Haudenschild; Matthew M Hims; Terena James; Mingming Jia; Zoya Kingsbury; Catherine Leroy; John Marshall; Andrew Menzies; Laura J Mudie; Zemin Ning; Tom Royce; Ole B Schulz-Trieglaff; Anastassia Spiridou; Lucy A Stebbings; Lukasz Szajkowski; Jon Teague; David Williamson; Lynda Chin; Mark T Ross; Peter J Campbell; David R Bentley; P Andrew Futreal; Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Effects of a synthetic antigonadotrophin (2-amino,5-nitrothiazole) on growth of experimental testicular teratomas.

Authors:  J Guthrie
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Heat shock factor 1 is a powerful multifaceted modifier of carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Chengkai Dai; Luke Whitesell; Arlin B Rogers; Susan Lindquist
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Assessing the evolutionary impact of amino acid mutations in the human genome.

Authors:  Adam R Boyko; Scott H Williamson; Amit R Indap; Jeremiah D Degenhardt; Ryan D Hernandez; Kirk E Lohmueller; Mark D Adams; Steffen Schmidt; John J Sninsky; Shamil R Sunyaev; Thomas J White; Rasmus Nielsen; Andrew G Clark; Carlos D Bustamante
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  137 in total

Review 1.  The NF1 somatic mutational landscape in sporadic human cancers.

Authors:  Charlotte Philpott; Hannah Tovell; Ian M Frayling; David N Cooper; Meena Upadhyaya
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.639

Review 2.  Big Bang Tumor Growth and Clonal Evolution.

Authors:  Ruping Sun; Zheng Hu; Christina Curtis
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 3.  Colorectal cancer: genetic abnormalities, tumor progression, tumor heterogeneity, clonal evolution and tumor-initiating cells.

Authors:  Ugo Testa; Elvira Pelosi; Germana Castelli
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-13

Review 4.  Merging molecular mechanism and evolution: theory and computation at the interface of biophysics and evolutionary population genetics.

Authors:  Adrian W R Serohijos; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 5.  Decanalizing thinking on genetic canalization.

Authors:  Kerry Geiler-Samerotte; Federica M O Sartori; Mark L Siegal
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 7.727

6.  A common cancer-associated DNA polymerase ε mutation causes an exceptionally strong mutator phenotype, indicating fidelity defects distinct from loss of proofreading.

Authors:  Daniel P Kane; Polina V Shcherbakova
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Mutant TP53 disrupts age-related accumulation patterns of somatic mutations in multiple cancer types.

Authors:  Wensheng Zhang; Erik K Flemington; Kun Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2016-07-09

Review 8.  Modeling Tumor Clonal Evolution for Drug Combinations Design.

Authors:  Boyang Zhao; Michael T Hemann; Douglas A Lauffenburger
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2016-03

9.  MUC16 mutations improve patients' prognosis by enhancing the infiltration and antitumor immunity of cytotoxic T lymphocytes in the endometrial cancer microenvironment.

Authors:  Jing Hu; Jing Sun
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 10.  Bioinformatic approaches to augment study of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in lung cancer.

Authors:  Tim N Beck; Adaeze J Chikwem; Nehal R Solanki; Erica A Golemis
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.