Literature DB >> 23388359

Depression, anxiety, and moods of hospitalized patients under contact precautions.

Hannah R Day1, Eli N Perencevich, Anthony D Harris, Ann L Gruber-Baldini, Seth S Himelhoch, Clayton H Brown, Daniel J Morgan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between contact precautions and depression or anxiety as well as feelings of anger, sadness, worry, happiness, or confusion.
DESIGN: Prospective frequency-matched cohort study.
SETTING: The University of Maryland Medical Center, a 662-bed tertiary care hospital in Baltimore, Maryland. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1,876 medical and surgical patients over the age of 18 years were approached; 528 patients were enrolled from January through November 2010, and 296 patients, frequency matched by hospital unit, completed follow-up on hospital day 3.
RESULTS: The primary outcome was Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores on hospital day 3, controlling for baseline HADS scores. Secondary moods were measured with visual analog mood scale diaries. Patients under contact precautions had baseline symptoms of depression 1.3 points higher (P<.01) and anxiety 0.8 points higher (P=.08) at hospital admission using HADS. Exposure to contact precautions was not associated with increased depression (P=.42) or anxiety (P=.25) on hospital day 3. On hospital day 3, patients under contact precautions were no more likely than unexposed patients to be angry (20% vs 20%; P=.99), sad (33% vs 38%; P=.45), worried (51% vs 46%; P=.41), happy (58% vs 67%; P=.14), or confused (23% vs 24%; P=.95).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients under contact precautions have more symptoms of depression and anxiety at hospital admission but do not appear to be more likely to develop depression, anxiety, or negative moods while under contact precautions. The use of contact precautions should not be restricted by the belief that contact precautions will produce more depression or anxiety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23388359     DOI: 10.1086/669526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  19 in total

1.  The Effect of Contact Precautions on Frequency of Hospital Adverse Events.

Authors:  Lindsay D Croft; Michael Liquori; James Ladd; Hannah Day; Lisa Pineles; Elizabeth Lamos; Ryan Arnold; Preeti Mehrotra; Jeffrey C Fink; Patricia Langenberg; Linda Simoni-Wastila; Eli Perencevich; Anthony D Harris; Daniel J Morgan
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  Sadness: diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment.

Authors:  Hermioni N Lokko; Theodore A Stern
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2014-11-20

3.  Effects of contact precautions on patient perception of care and satisfaction: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Preeti Mehrotra; Lindsay Croft; Hannah R Day; Eli N Perencevich; Lisa Pineles; Anthony D Harris; Saul N Weingart; Daniel J Morgan
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.254

4.  Frequency of Adverse Events Before, During, and After Hospital Admission.

Authors:  Lindsay D Croft; Michael E Liquori; James Ladd; Hannah R Day; Lisa Pineles; Elizabeth M Lamos; Preeti Mehrotra; Eli N Perencevich; Anthony D Harris; Daniel J Morgan
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.954

5.  Deconstructing the relative benefits of a universal glove and gown intervention on MRSA acquisition.

Authors:  A D Harris; D J Morgan; L Pineles; E N Perencevich; S L Barnes
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Adverse effects of isolation: a prospective matched cohort study including 90 direct interviews of hospitalized patients in a French University Hospital.

Authors:  B Guilley-Lerondeau; C Bourigault; A-C Guille des Buttes; G Birgand; D Lepelletier
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Impact of rapid screening for discontinuation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus contact precautions.

Authors:  Erica S Shenoy; Hang Lee; Jessica A Cotter; Winston Ware; Douglas Kelbaugh; Eric Weil; Rochelle P Walensky; David C Hooper
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 2.918

8.  Active Surveillance and Decolonization Without Isolation Is Effective in Preventing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Transmission in the Psychiatry Units.

Authors:  Sanchita Das; Maureen Harazin; Marc Oliver Wright; Irene Dusich; Ari Robicsek; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.835

9.  The relationship between subjective perception and the psychological effects of patients in spatial isolation.

Authors:  Fabienne Ibert; Monika Eckstein; Frank Günther; Nico T Mutters
Journal:  GMS Hyg Infect Control       Date:  2017-08-10

Review 10.  Vancomycin-resistant enterococcus infection in the hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient: an overview of epidemiology, management, and prevention.

Authors:  Esther Benamu; Stanley Deresinski
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-01-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.