Literature DB >> 23388184

Individually tailored left ventricular lead placement: lessons from multimodality integration between three-dimensional echocardiography and coronary sinus angiogram.

Michael Döring1, Frieder Braunschweig, Charlotte Eitel, Thomas Gaspar, Ulrike Wetzel, Bettina Nitsche, Gerhard Hindricks, Christopher Piorkowski.   

Abstract

AIMS: Non-responder rates for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) vary from 11% to 46%. Retrospective data imply a better outcome with stimulation of the latest contracting left ventricular (LV) region. Our study analysed the feasibility, safety and clinical outcome of prospectively planned LV lead placement at the site of latest mechanical activation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Thirty-eight heart failure patients with CRT indication were assessed by three-dimensional (3D) transoesophageal echocardiography and rotation angiography of the coronary sinus (CS). Both images were merged into a single 3D-model to identify CS target veins close to the site of latest mechanical activation. Subsequently, LV lead deployment was attempted at the desired target position. Patients were clinically and echocardiographically evaluated at baseline, after 3 and 6 months. The area of latest mechanical activation covered 6 ± 2 segments (38 ± 13% of LV surface) and was found lateral in 24 of 37 (65%), anterior in 11 of 37 (30%), inferior in 2 of 37 (5%), and septal in 1 of 37 (3%) patients. In 36 of 37 (97%) patients an appropriate target vein was identified and successful implantation could be performed in 34 of 37 (92%) patients. Among those patients clinical and echocardiographic response was observed in 91% and 81%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Individualized lead placement at the latest contracting LV site can be performed safely and successfully in the majority of patients. Initial clinical outcome data are encouraging. Identification of target sites requires multimodality integration between LV wall motion data and CS anatomy. Future developments need to improve those technologies and require randomized data on clinical outcome parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23388184     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eus396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  6 in total

1.  Three-dimensional rotational venography of the coronary sinus tree facilitates left ventricular lead implantation for CRT.

Authors:  Jan Kaufmann; Jin-Hong Gerds-Li; Charalampos Kriatselis; Eckart Fleck; Stephan Goetze
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Image artefact propagation in motion estimation and reconstruction in interventional cardiac C-arm CT.

Authors:  K Müller; A K Maier; C Schwemmer; G Lauritsch; S De Buck; J-Y Wielandts; J Hornegger; R Fahrig
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Device therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction-cardiac resynchronization therapy and more.

Authors:  D Duncker; C Veltmann
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 4.  Image-guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: focused on image fusion methods.

Authors:  Premysl Hajek; Iva Safarikova; Jan Baxa
Journal:  J Appl Biomed       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 1.797

5.  Change in indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy?

Authors:  Dennis Lawin; Christoph Stellbrink
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 6.  Optimal site selection and image fusion guidance technology to facilitate cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Benjamin J Sieniewicz; Justin Gould; Bradley Porter; Baldeep S Sidhu; Jonathan M Behar; Simon Claridge; Steve Niederer; Christopher A Rinaldi
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 3.166

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.