Literature DB >> 23387794

Emotional and non-emotional memories are suppressible under direct suppression instructions.

Kevin van Schie1, Elke Geraerts, Michael C Anderson.   

Abstract

Research on retrieval suppression has produced varying results concerning whether negatively valenced memories are more or less suppressible than neutral memories. This variability may arise if, across studies, participants adopt different approaches to memory control. Cognitive and neurobiological research points to two mechanisms that achieve retrieval suppression: thought-substitution and direct suppression (Benoit & Anderson, 2012; Bergström, de Fockert, & Richardson-Klavehn, 2009). Using the Think/No-think paradigm, this study examined whether participants can inhibit neutral and negatively valenced memories, using a uniform direct suppression strategy. Importantly, when strategy was controlled, negative and neutral items were comparably inhibited. Participants reported high compliance with direct suppression instructions, and success at controlling awareness predicted forgetting. These findings provide the first evidence that direct suppression can impair negatively valenced events, and suggest that variability in forgetting negative memories in prior studies is unlikely to arise from difficulty using direct suppression to control emotionally negative experiences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23387794     DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2013.765387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Emot        ISSN: 0269-9931


  17 in total

1.  EEG evidence that morally relevant autobiographical memories can be suppressed.

Authors:  Akul Satish; Robin Hellerstedt; Michael C Anderson; Zara M Bergström
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.526

2.  Suppression weakens unwanted memories via a sustained reduction of neural reactivation.

Authors:  Ann-Kristin Meyer; Roland G Benoit
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  Failing to forget: inhibitory-control deficits compromise memory suppression in posttraumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  Ana Catarino; Charlotte S Küpper; Aliza Werner-Seidler; Tim Dalgleish; Michael C Anderson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-04-06

4.  Accounting for intrusive thoughts in PTSD: Contributions of cognitive control and deliberate regulation strategies.

Authors:  Jessica Bomyea; Ariel J Lang
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.839

5.  Older adults can suppress unwanted memories when given an appropriate strategy.

Authors:  Brendan D Murray; Michael C Anderson; Elizabeth A Kensinger
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-01-19

6.  Parallel Regulation of Memory and Emotion Supports the Suppression of Intrusive Memories.

Authors:  Pierre Gagnepain; Justin Hulbert; Michael C Anderson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Emotions shape memory suppression in trait anxiety.

Authors:  Tessa Marzi; Antonio Regina; Stefania Righi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-03

Review 8.  Neural mechanisms of motivated forgetting.

Authors:  Michael C Anderson; Simon Hanslmayr
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Direct suppression as a mechanism for controlling unpleasant memories in daily life.

Authors:  Charlotte S Küpper; Roland G Benoit; Tim Dalgleish; Michael C Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-04-21

10.  Behavioral and EEG Evidence for Auditory Memory Suppression.

Authors:  Maya E Cano; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.