Literature DB >> 23386928

Effectiveness of tips for delicate micro-ultrasonic root planing comparing to tips for traditional ultrasonic root planing.

Gianna Maria Nardi1, Roberto Di Giorgio, Silvia Sabatini.   

Abstract

AIM: The present study wants to evaluate the effectiveness in the improvement of several periodontal indices, such as probing pocket depth, bleeding on probing and plaque index, and the patient subjective preference to the treatment of root planning with tips for delicate -micro ultrasonic therapy comparing to traditional ones.
METHODS: Thirty patients were selected for our randomized split mouth study; in each patient two quadrants (test) were treated with tips for delicate micro-ultrasonic root planing, and two quadrants (control) with tips for traditional ultrasonic root planing. Probing pocket depth, bleeding on probing and plaque index were collected at baseline, after six weeks and after six months. Patients were asked to assess the subjective preference of the type of treatment with Visual Analogue Scale (Vas) especially designed and immediately administered after the treatment.
RESULTS: Probing pocket depth and plaque index had a parallel improvement in both groups, while the bleeding on probing improved significantly in test group. The majority of patients (23 to 30, 76,6%) has expressed preference with VAS for the treatment with new tips.
CONCLUSIONS: The new tips created for periodontal maintaining can be really advantageous in terms of reduction of plaque and bleeding indexes; the main point in favor of these tips is the reduction of the discomfort for the patient. Finally this approach tends to be less time consuming than a manual instrumentation method.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cementum; periodontal disease; root surfaces; ultrasonic instrumentation

Year:  2012        PMID: 23386928      PMCID: PMC3555466     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)        ISSN: 1824-0852


  9 in total

1.  A clinical evaluation of hand and ultrasonic instruments on subgingival debridement. 1. With unmodified and modified ultrasonic inserts.

Authors:  M R Dragoo
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Scanning electron microscopy of the root surface following instrumentation.

Authors:  R F Wilkinson; J E Maybury
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 6.993

Review 3.  Scaling and root planing without overinstrumentation: hand versus power-driven scalers.

Authors:  C L Drisko
Journal:  Curr Opin Periodontol       Date:  1993

4.  Root surface texture after different scaling modalities.

Authors:  L Jacobson; J Blomlöf; S Lindskog
Journal:  Scand J Dent Res       Date:  1994-06

Review 5.  Effects of nonsurgical periodontal therapy on periodontitis in humans. A review.

Authors:  J S Garrett
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 8.728

6.  Calculus removal and loss of tooth substance in response to different periodontal instruments. A scanning electron microscope study.

Authors:  T Lie; K Meyer
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 8.728

7.  A comparison of dental ultrasonic technologies on subgingival calculus removal: a pilot study.

Authors:  Lidia Brión Silva; Kathleen O Hodges; Kristin Hamman Calley; John A Seikel
Journal:  J Dent Hyg       Date:  2012-05-01

8.  Comparative evaluation of hand and power-driven instruments on root surface characteristics: A scanning electron microscopy study.

Authors:  Parveen Dahiya; Reet Kamal; Rajan Gupta; Nymphea Pandit
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2011-04

9.  A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of manual, magnetostrictive and piezoelectric ultrasonic instruments--an in vitro profilometric and SEM study.

Authors:  Sumita Singh; Ashita Uppoor; Dilip Nayak
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.698

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.