Literature DB >> 23386765

Antibiotic-coated nail for fusion of infected charcot ankles.

Abhijit Pawar1, Goksel Dikmen, Austin Fragomen, S Robert Rozbruch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treating infected ankles in patients with neuropathy is difficult, and complications are frequently encountered. Eradication of infection and effective arthrodesis are required for a successful outcome. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with Charcot neuropathy whose infected ankles were treated with a retrograde, antibiotic-coated, locked intramedullary nail.
METHODS: We analyzed 5 patients with infected neuroarthropathy of the ankle joint. Three patients had failed treatment with the circular external fixator for infected neuroarthropathy of the ankle. The other 2 were treated primarily by this technique. All patients were treated with surgical nonunion repair, arthrodesis, and insertion of an antibiotic-coated, locked intramedullary nail. The average age was 59 years (range, 46 to 82 years). The average follow up period was 18 months (range, 12-24 months).
RESULTS: The average time taken for radiological healing was 4.1 months (range, 4-4.5 months). In all patients, bony union was achieved and infection was eradicated. There were no cases of hardware failure.
CONCLUSION: Antibiotic-coated nails were used to treat infected ankle nonunions and infected distal tibial fractures in Charcot patients with successful bony union, fusion, and eradication of infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23386765     DOI: 10.1177/1071100712460209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  8 in total

Review 1.  Complex ankle arthrodesis: Review of the literature.

Authors:  Remy V Rabinovich; Amgad M Haleem; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-09-18

2.  Efficacy of Infection Eradication in Antibiotic Cement-Coated Intramedullary Nails for Fracture-Related Infections, Nonunions, and Fusions.

Authors:  Janet D Conway; Ahmed H Elhessy; Selin Galiboglu; Nirav Patel; Martin G Gesheff
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-25

3.  Charcot foot reconstruction outcomes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Joon Ha; Thomas Hester; Robert Foley; Ines L H Reichert; Prashanth R J Vas; Raju Ahluwalia; Venu Kavarthapu
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-04-20

Review 4.  Prevention of pin site infection in external fixation: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Nikolas H Kazmers; Austin T Fragomen; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2016-05-12

Review 5.  Evidence-Based Recommendations for Local Antimicrobial Strategies and Dead Space Management in Fracture-Related Infection.

Authors:  Willem-Jan Metsemakers; Austin T Fragomen; T Fintan Moriarty; Mario Morgenstern; Kenneth A Egol; Charalampos Zalavras; William T Obremskey; Michael Raschke; Martin A McNally
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.884

6.  Charcot Neuroarthropathy: Current Surgical Management and Update. A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mohd Yazid Bajuri; Shir Lee Ong; Srijit Das; Isa Naina Mohamed
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-08

Review 7.  Charcot foot and ankle with osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Ryan Donegan; Bauer Sumpio; Peter A Blume
Journal:  Diabet Foot Ankle       Date:  2013-10-01

Review 8.  Management of Ankle Charcot Neuroarthropathy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ahmed ElSayed Galhoum; Vineet Trivedi; Mohamed Askar; Sergio Tejero; Mario Herrera-Pérez; Yousef AlRashidi; Victor Valderrabano
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.