BACKGROUND: In 3 randomized controlled trials in heart failure (HF), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists reduced mortality. The net benefit from randomized controlled trials may not be generalizable, and eplerenone was, but spironolactone was not, studied in mild HF. We tested the hypothesis that spironolactone is associated with reduced mortality also in a broad unselected contemporary population with HF and reduced ejection fraction, in particular New York Heart Association (NYHA) I-II. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively studied 18 852 patients (age 71±12 years; 28% women) with NYHA I-IV and ejection fraction <40% who were registered in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry between 2000 and 2012 and who were (n=6551) or were not (n=12 301) treated with spironolactone. We derived propensity scores for spironolactone treatment based on 41 covariates. We assessed survival by Cox regression with adjustment for propensity scores and with matching based on propensity score. We performed sensitivity and residual confounding analyses and analyzed the NYHA I-II and III-IV subgroups separately. One-year survival was 83% versus 84% in treated versus untreated patients (log rank P<0.001). After adjustment for propensity scores, the hazard ratio for spironolactone was 1.05 (95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.11; P=0.054). Spironolactone interacted with NYHA (P<0.001). In the NYHA I-II subgroup, after adjustment for propensity scores, the hazard ratio for spironolactone was 1.11 (95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.21; P=0.019). CONCLUSIONS: In an unselected contemporary population of HF with reduced ejection fraction, spironolactone was not associated with reduced mortality. The net benefits of spironolactone may be lower outside the clinical trial setting and in milder HF.
BACKGROUND: In 3 randomized controlled trials in heart failure (HF), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists reduced mortality. The net benefit from randomized controlled trials may not be generalizable, and eplerenone was, but spironolactone was not, studied in mild HF. We tested the hypothesis that spironolactone is associated with reduced mortality also in a broad unselected contemporary population with HF and reduced ejection fraction, in particular New York Heart Association (NYHA) I-II. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively studied 18 852 patients (age 71±12 years; 28% women) with NYHA I-IV and ejection fraction <40% who were registered in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry between 2000 and 2012 and who were (n=6551) or were not (n=12 301) treated with spironolactone. We derived propensity scores for spironolactone treatment based on 41 covariates. We assessed survival by Cox regression with adjustment for propensity scores and with matching based on propensity score. We performed sensitivity and residual confounding analyses and analyzed the NYHA I-II and III-IV subgroups separately. One-year survival was 83% versus 84% in treated versus untreated patients (log rank P<0.001). After adjustment for propensity scores, the hazard ratio for spironolactone was 1.05 (95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.11; P=0.054). Spironolactone interacted with NYHA (P<0.001). In the NYHA I-II subgroup, after adjustment for propensity scores, the hazard ratio for spironolactone was 1.11 (95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.21; P=0.019). CONCLUSIONS: In an unselected contemporary population of HF with reduced ejection fraction, spironolactone was not associated with reduced mortality. The net benefits of spironolactone may be lower outside the clinical trial setting and in milder HF.
Authors: Sara Jane Webb; Michelle M Garrison; Raphael Bernier; Abbi M McClintic; Bryan H King; Pierre D Mourad Journal: Autism Res Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 5.216
Authors: Phillip H Lam; Daniel J Dooley; Chakradhari Inampudi; Cherinne Arundel; Gregg C Fonarow; Javed Butler; Wen-Chih Wu; Marc R Blackman; Markus S Anker; Prakash Deedwania; Michel White; Sumanth D Prabhu; Charity J Morgan; Thomas E Love; Wilbert S Aronow; Richard M Allman; Ali Ahmed Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: W von Scheidt; C Zugck; M Pauschinger; R Hambrecht; O Bruder; A Hartmann; M Rauchhaus; R Zahn; J Brachmann; U Tebbe; T Neumann; R H Strasser; M Böhm; S Störk; M Hochadel; P Heidemann; J Senges Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2014-07-23 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Essraa Bayoumi; Phillip H Lam; Daniel J Dooley; Steven Singh; Charles Faselis; Charity J Morgan; Samir Patel; Helen M Sheriff; Selma F Mohammed; Carlos E Palant; Bertram Pitt; Gregg C Fonarow; Ali Ahmed Journal: Am J Med Date: 2018-09-19 Impact factor: 4.965