Literature DB >> 23386212

Examining porous bio-active glass as a potential osteo-odonto-keratoprosthetic skirt material.

Reeta Huhtinen1, Susan Sandeman, Susanna Rose, Elsie Fok, Carol Howell, Linda Fröberg, Niko Moritz, Leena Hupa, Andrew Lloyd.   

Abstract

Bio-active glass has been developed for use as a bone substitute with strong osteo-inductive capacity and the ability to form strong bonds with soft and hard tissue. The ability of this material to enhance tissue in-growth suggests its potential use as a substitute for the dental laminate of an osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis. A preliminary in vitro investigation of porous bio-active glass as an OOKP skirt material was carried out. Porous glass structures were manufactured from bio-active glasses 1-98 and 28-04 containing varying oxide formulation (1-98, 28-04) and particle size range (250-315 μm for 1-98 and 28-04a, 315-500 μm for 28-04b). Dissolution of the porous glass structure and its effect on pH was measured. Structural 2D and 3D analysis of porous structures were performed. Cell culture experiments were carried out to study keratocyte adhesion and the inflammatory response induced by the porous glass materials. The dissolution results suggested that the porous structure made out of 1-98 dissolves faster than the structures made from glass 28-04. pH experiments showed that the dissolution of the porous glass increased the pH of the surrounding solution. The cell culture results showed that keratocytes adhered onto the surface of each of the porous glass structures, but cell adhesion and spreading was greatest for the 98a bio-glass. Cytokine production by all porous glass samples was similar to that of the negative control indicating that the glasses do not induce a cytokine driven inflammatory response. Cell culture results support the potential use of synthetic porous bio-glass as an OOKP skirt material in terms of limited inflammatory potential and capacity to induce and support tissue ingrowth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23386212     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-013-4881-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  19 in total

1.  [OSTEO-ODONTOKERATOPROSTHESIS].

Authors:  B STRAMPELLI
Journal:  Ann Ottalmol Clin Ocul       Date:  1963-12

2.  Towards a synthetic osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  Reeta Viitala; Valerie Franklin; David Green; Christopher Liu; Andrew Lloyd; Brian Tighe
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  In vivo fibroplasia of a porous polymer in the cornea.

Authors:  V Trinkaus-Randall; R Banwatt; J Capecchi; H M Leibowitz; C Franzblau
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Effects of biologically modified surfaces of synthetic lenticules on corneal epithelialization in vivo.

Authors:  R Z Xie; D F Sweeney; G J Beumer; G Johnson; H J Griesser; J G Steele
Journal:  Aust N Z J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-05

5.  In vitro evaluation of fibroplasia in a porous polymer.

Authors:  V Trinkaus-Randall; J Capecchi; L Sammon; D Gibbons; H M Leibowitz; C Franzblau
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Collagen-immobilized poly(vinyl alcohol) as an artificial cornea scaffold that supports a stratified corneal epithelium.

Authors:  Hideyuki Miyashita; Shigeto Shimmura; Hisatoshi Kobayashi; Tetsushi Taguchi; Naoko Asano-Kato; Yuichi Uchino; Masabumi Kato; Jun Shimazaki; Junzo Tanaka; Kazuo Tsubota
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 7.  An overview of the development of artificial corneas with porous skirts and the use of PHEMA for such an application.

Authors:  T V Chirila
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Corneal epithelial cell attachment with endogenous laminin and fibronectin.

Authors:  M Ohji; L Mandarino; N SundarRaj; R A Thoft
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Autoclavable highly cross-linked polyurethane networks in ophthalmology.

Authors:  P Bruin; E A Meeuwsen; M V van Andel; J G Worst; A J Pennings
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 10.  Biologic keratoprosthesis materials.

Authors:  Joseph B Ciolino; Claes H Dohlman
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  2009
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Keratoprosthesis: A Review of Recent Advances in the Field.

Authors:  Borja Salvador-Culla; Paraskevi E Kolovou
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2016-05-19

Review 2.  Osteo-odonto keratoprosthesis: Innovative dental and ophthalmic blending.

Authors:  Jaswinder Kaur
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

Review 3.  Histopathologic Evaluation of Polymer Supports for Pintucci-type Keratoprostheses: An Animal Study.

Authors:  Saeed Rahmani; Mozhgan Rezaei Kanavi; Mohammad Ali Javadi; Masoumeh Meskinfam Langroudi; Sasha Afsar Aski
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2019-07-18

4.  Biomimetic bone-like composites as osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis skirt substitutes.

Authors:  Venkata Avadhanam; Ganesh Ingavle; Yishan Zheng; Sandeep Kumar; Christopher Liu; Susan Sandeman
Journal:  J Biomater Appl       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.646

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.