Literature DB >> 23385105

Participation of ICUs in critical care pandemic research: a province wide, cross-sectional survey.

Karen E A Burns1, Leena Rizvi, Wylie Tan, John C Marshall, Karen Pope.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Little information exists to identify barriers to participation in pandemic research involving critically ill patients. We sought to characterize clinical research activity during the recent influenza A pandemic and to understand the experiences, beliefs, and practices of key stakeholders involved in pandemic research implementation.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional, provincial postal questionnaire.
SETTING: Level III ICUs. PARTICIPANTS: ICU administrators and research coordinators. MEASUREMENTS: We used rigorous survey methodology to identify potential respondents and to develop, test, and administer two-related questionnaires. MAIN
RESULTS: We analyzed responses from 39 research coordinators and 139 administrators (response rates: 70.9% and 73.2%, respectively). Compared with non-influenza A studies, influenza A studies were less likely to be randomized trials and most often investigator-initiated and peer-review funded. Whereas both respondent groups felt that pandemic research would be helpful in providing care during future pandemics, research coordinators placed significantly greater importance on their ICU's participation in pandemic research. Both respondent groups expressed a need for rapid approval processes, designated funding for research personnel, adequate funding for start-up and patient screening, preapproved template protocols and consent forms, and clearer guidance regarding co-enrollment. Research coordinators acknowledged a need for alternative consent models to increase their capacity to participate in future pandemic research. More administrators expressed willingness to participate in the next pandemic if the required research resources were made available to them.
CONCLUSIONS: Whereas research personnel and administrators support participation in pandemic ICU research, several modifiable barriers to participation exist. Pandemic research preparedness planning with regulatory bodies and dedicated funding to support research infrastructure, especially in community settings, are required to optimize future pandemic research participation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23385105     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318275d061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  5 in total

Review 1.  Always ready, always prepared-preparing for the next pandemic.

Authors:  Mitchell Hamele; Katie Neumayer; Jill Sweney; W Bradley Poss
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2018-10

Review 2.  Key stakeholder perceptions about consent to participate in acute illness research: a rapid, systematic review to inform epi/pandemic research preparedness.

Authors:  Nina H Gobat; Micaela Gal; Nick A Francis; Kerenza Hood; Angela Watkins; Jill Turner; Ronald Moore; Steve A R Webb; Christopher C Butler; Alistair Nichol
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Addressing challenges for clinical research responses to emerging epidemics and pandemics: a scoping review.

Authors:  Louise Sigfrid; Katherine Maskell; Peter G Bannister; Sharif A Ismail; Shelui Collinson; Sadie Regmi; Claire Blackmore; Eli Harriss; Kajsa-Stina Longuere; Nina Gobat; Peter Horby; Mike Clarke; Gail Carson
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  Meta-trial of awake prone positioning with nasal high flow therapy: Invitation to join a pandemic collaborative research effort.

Authors:  Jie Li; Ivan Pavlov; John G Laffey; Oriol Roca; Sara Mirza; Yonatan Perez; Bairbre McNicholas; David Cosgrave; David Vines; Elsa Tavernier; Stephan Ehrmann
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.425

Review 5.  Principles Guiding Nonpandemic Critical Care Research During a Pandemic.

Authors:  Deborah J Cook; Michelle E Kho; Eric H Duan; Waleed Alhazzani; Alyson Takaoka; France J Clarke; Nicole Zytaruk; Meredith Vanstone
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 9.296

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.