OBJECTIVES: This report assesses participant perception of treatment assignment in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of saw palmetto for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BCM). DESIGN: Participants randomized to receive saw palmetto were instructed to take one 320 mg gelcap daily for the first 24 weeks, two 320 mg gelcaps daily for the second 24 weeks, and three 320 mg gelcaps daily for the third 24 weeks. Study participants assigned to placebo were instructed to take the same number of matching placebo gelcaps in each time period. At 24, 48, and 72 weeks postrandomization, the American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI) was administered and participants were asked to guess their treatment assignment. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at 11 clinical centers in North America. PARTICIPANTS: Study participants were men, 45 years and older, with moderate to low severe BPH symptoms, randomized to saw palmetto (N=151) orplacebo (N=155). OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment arms were compared with respect to the distribution of participant guesses of treatment assignment. RESULTS: For participants assigned to saw palmetto, 22.5%, 24.7%, and 29.8% correctly thought they were taking saw palmetto, and 37.3%, 40.0%, and 44.4% incorrectly thought they were on placebo at 24, 48, and 72 weeks, respectively. For placebo participants, 21.8%, 27.4%, and 25.2% incorrectly thought they were on saw palmetto, and 41.6%, 39.9%, and 42.6% correctly thought they were on placebo at 24, 48, and 72 weeks, respectively. The treatment arms did not vary with respect to the distributions of participants who guessed they were on saw palmetto (p=0.823) or placebo (p=0.893). Participants who experienced an improvement in AUA-SI were 2.16 times more likely to think they were on saw palmetto. CONCLUSIONS: Blinding of treatment assignment was successful in this study. Improvement in BPH-related symptoms was associated with the perception that participants were taking saw palmetto.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: This report assesses participant perception of treatment assignment in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of saw palmetto for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BCM). DESIGN:Participants randomized to receive saw palmetto were instructed to take one 320 mg gelcap daily for the first 24 weeks, two 320 mg gelcaps daily for the second 24 weeks, and three 320 mg gelcaps daily for the third 24 weeks. Study participants assigned to placebo were instructed to take the same number of matching placebo gelcaps in each time period. At 24, 48, and 72 weeks postrandomization, the American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI) was administered and participants were asked to guess their treatment assignment. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at 11 clinical centers in North America. PARTICIPANTS: Study participants were men, 45 years and older, with moderate to low severe BPH symptoms, randomized to saw palmetto (N=151) or placebo (N=155). OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment arms were compared with respect to the distribution of participant guesses of treatment assignment. RESULTS: For participants assigned to saw palmetto, 22.5%, 24.7%, and 29.8% correctly thought they were taking saw palmetto, and 37.3%, 40.0%, and 44.4% incorrectly thought they were on placebo at 24, 48, and 72 weeks, respectively. For placebo participants, 21.8%, 27.4%, and 25.2% incorrectly thought they were on saw palmetto, and 41.6%, 39.9%, and 42.6% correctly thought they were on placebo at 24, 48, and 72 weeks, respectively. The treatment arms did not vary with respect to the distributions of participants who guessed they were on saw palmetto (p=0.823) or placebo (p=0.893). Participants who experienced an improvement in AUA-SI were 2.16 times more likely to think they were on saw palmetto. CONCLUSIONS: Blinding of treatment assignment was successful in this study. Improvement in BPH-related symptoms was associated with the perception that participants were taking saw palmetto.
Authors: D G Altman; K F Schulz; D Moher; M Egger; F Davidoff; D Elbourne; P C Gøtzsche; T Lang Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2001-04-17 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: J Curtis Nickel; Peter Gilling; Teuvo L Tammela; Betsy Morrill; Timothy H Wilson; Roger S Rittmaster Journal: BJU Int Date: 2011-06-01 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Karen E Damico; Andrew L Stoll; Lauren B Marangell; Bruce M Cohen Journal: Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 4.006
Authors: Michael J Barry; Sreelatha Meleth; Jeannette Y Lee; Karl J Kreder; Andrew L Avins; J Curtis Nickel; Claus G Roehrborn; E David Crawford; Harris E Foster; Steven A Kaplan; Andrew McCullough; Gerald L Andriole; Michael J Naslund; O Dale Williams; John W Kusek; Catherine M Meyers; Joseph M Betz; Alan Cantor; Kevin T McVary Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-09-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Claus G Roehrborn; Jack Barkin; Paul Siami; Andrea Tubaro; Timothy H Wilson; Betsy B Morrill; R Paul Gagnier Journal: BJU Int Date: 2011-02-18 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Jonathan RT Davidson; Kishore M Gadde; John A Fairbank; K Ranga Rama Krishnan; Robert M Califf; Cynthia Binanay; Corette B Parker; Norma Pugh; Tyler D Hartwell; Benedetto Vitiello; Louise Ritz; Joanne Severe; Jonathan O Cole; Charles de Battista; P Murali Doraiswamy; John P Feighner; Paul Keck; Jeffrey Kelsey; Khae-Ming Lin; Peter D Londborg; Charles B Nemeroff; Alan F Schatzberg; David V Sheehan; Ram K Srivastava; Leslie Taylor; Madhukar H Trivedi; Richard H Weisler Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-04-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: John D McConnell; Claus G Roehrborn; Oliver M Bautista; Gerald L Andriole; Christopher M Dixon; John W Kusek; Herbert Lepor; Kevin T McVary; Leroy M Nyberg; Harry S Clarke; E David Crawford; Ananias Diokno; John P Foley; Harris E Foster; Stephen C Jacobs; Steven A Kaplan; Karl J Kreder; Michael M Lieber; M Scott Lucia; Gary J Miller; Mani Menon; Douglas F Milam; Joe W Ramsdell; Noah S Schenkman; Kevin M Slawin; Joseph A Smith Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-12-18 Impact factor: 91.245