Literature DB >> 23383962

Reduction of nanoparticle avidity enhances the selectivity of vascular targeting and PET detection of pulmonary inflammation.

Blaine J Zern1, Ann-Marie Chacko, Jin Liu, Colin F Greineder, Eric R Blankemeyer, Ravi Radhakrishnan, Vladimir Muzykantov.   

Abstract

Targeting nanoparticles (NPs) loaded with drugs and probes to precise locations in the body may improve the treatment and detection of many diseases. Generally, to achieve targeting, affinity ligands are introduced on the surface of NPs that can bind to molecules present on the cell of interest. Optimization of ligand density is a critical parameter in controlling NP binding to target cells, and a higher ligand density is not always the most effective. In this study, we investigated how NP avidity affects targeting to the pulmonary vasculature, using NPs targeted to ICAM-1. This cell adhesion molecule is expressed by quiescent endothelium at modest levels and is upregulated in a variety of pathological settings. NP avidity was controlled by ligand density, with the expected result that higher avidity NPs demonstrated greater pulmonary uptake than lower avidity NPs in both naive and pathological mice. However, in comparison with high-avidity NPs, low-avidity NPs exhibited several-fold higher selectivity of targeting to pathological endothelium. This finding was translated into a PET imaging platform that was more effective in detecting pulmonary vascular inflammation using low-avidity NPs. Furthermore, computational modeling revealed that elevated expression of ICAM-1 on the endothelium is critical for multivalent anchoring of NPs with low avidity, while high-avidity NPs anchor effectively to both quiescent and activated endothelium. These results provide a paradigm that can be used to optimize NP targeting by manipulating ligand density and may find biomedical utility for increasing detection of pathological vasculature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23383962      PMCID: PMC3609928          DOI: 10.1021/nn305773f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Nano        ISSN: 1936-0851            Impact factor:   15.881


  62 in total

1.  Controlling ligand surface density optimizes nanoparticle binding to ICAM-1.

Authors:  Amir Fakhari; Abdulgader Baoum; Teruna J Siahaan; Khoi Ba Le; Cory Berkland
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 2.  Multifunctional nanoparticles: cost versus benefit of adding targeting and imaging capabilities.

Authors:  Zhiliang Cheng; Ajlan Al Zaki; James Z Hui; Vladimir R Muzykantov; Andrew Tsourkas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Boosting brain uptake of a therapeutic antibody by reducing its affinity for a transcytosis target.

Authors:  Y Joy Yu; Yin Zhang; Margaret Kenrick; Kwame Hoyte; Wilman Luk; Yanmei Lu; Jasvinder Atwal; J Michael Elliott; Saileta Prabhu; Ryan J Watts; Mark S Dennis
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  Engineering of targeted nanoparticles for cancer therapy using internalizing aptamers isolated by cell-uptake selection.

Authors:  Zeyu Xiao; Etgar Levy-Nissenbaum; Frank Alexis; Andrej Lupták; Benjamin A Teply; Juliana M Chan; Jinjun Shi; Elise Digga; Judy Cheng; Robert Langer; Omid C Farokhzad
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Endothelial targeting of high-affinity multivalent polymer nanocarriers directed to intercellular adhesion molecule 1.

Authors:  Silvia Muro; Thomas Dziubla; Weining Qiu; John Leferovich; Xiumin Cui; Erik Berk; Vladimir R Muzykantov
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2006-02-27       Impact factor: 4.030

6.  The complex role of multivalency in nanoparticles targeting the transferrin receptor for cancer therapies.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Shaomin Tian; Robby A Petros; Mary E Napier; Joseph M Desimone
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 7.  Peptide targeted lipid nanoparticles for anticancer drug delivery.

Authors:  Timothy R Pearce; Kamlesh Shroff; Efrosini Kokkoli
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 30.849

8.  Programmable nanoparticle functionalization for in vivo targeting.

Authors:  Hua Pan; Jacob W Myerson; Lingzhi Hu; Jon N Marsh; Kirk Hou; Michael J Scott; John S Allen; Grace Hu; Susana San Roman; Gregory M Lanza; Robert D Schreiber; Paul H Schlesinger; Samuel A Wickline
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Adhesion molecules and atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Stefan Blankenberg; Sandrine Barbaux; Laurence Tiret
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.162

10.  "Clickable" polymer-caged nanobins as a modular drug delivery platform.

Authors:  Sang-Min Lee; Haimei Chen; Thomas V O'Halloran; SonBinh T Nguyen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  39 in total

Review 1.  Targeted endothelial nanomedicine for common acute pathological conditions.

Authors:  Vladimir V Shuvaev; Jacob S Brenner; Vladimir R Muzykantov
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 9.776

2.  Vascular Accessibility of Endothelial Targeted Ferritin Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Makan Khoshnejad; Vladimir V Shuvaev; Katherine W Pulsipher; Chuanyun Dai; Elizabeth D Hood; Evguenia Arguiri; Melpo Christofidou-Solomidou; Ivan J Dmochowski; Colin F Greineder; Vladimir R Muzykantov
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.774

Review 3.  Targeting specific cells in the brain with nanomedicines for CNS therapies.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Yi-An Lin; Sujatha Kannan; Rangaramanujam M Kannan
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 4.  Nanocarriers for vascular delivery of anti-inflammatory agents.

Authors:  Melissa D Howard; Elizabeth D Hood; Blaine Zern; Vladimir V Shuvaev; Tilo Grosser; Vladimir R Muzykantov
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 13.820

Review 5.  Nanocarrier Hydrodynamics and Binding in Targeted Drug Delivery: Challenges in Numerical Modeling and Experimental Validation.

Authors:  Portonovo S Ayyaswamy; Vladimir Muzykantov; David M Eckmann; Ravi Radhakrishnan
Journal:  J Nanotechnol Eng Med       Date:  2013-07-11

Review 6.  Focus on Fundamentals: Achieving Effective Nanoparticle Targeting.

Authors:  Gregory T Tietjen; Laura G Bracaglia; W Mark Saltzman; Jordan S Pober
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 11.951

7.  Collaborative Enhancement of Endothelial Targeting of Nanocarriers by Modulating Platelet-Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1/CD31 Epitope Engagement.

Authors:  Ann-Marie Chacko; Jingyan Han; Colin F Greineder; Blaine J Zern; John L Mikitsh; Madhura Nayak; Divya Menon; Ian H Johnston; Mortimer Poncz; David M Eckmann; Peter F Davies; Vladimir R Muzykantov
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of Drug Delivery Systems.

Authors:  Patrick M Glassman; Vladimir R Muzykantov
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  Spatially controlled assembly of affinity ligand and enzyme cargo enables targeting ferritin nanocarriers to caveolae.

Authors:  Vladimir V Shuvaev; Makan Khoshnejad; Katherine W Pulsipher; Raisa Yu Kiseleva; Evguenia Arguiri; Jasmina C Cheung-Lau; Kathleen M LeFort; Melpo Christofidou-Solomidou; Radu V Stan; Ivan J Dmochowski; Vladimir R Muzykantov
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Optimization of Tet1 ligand density in HPMA-co-oligolysine copolymers for targeted neuronal gene delivery.

Authors:  David S H Chu; Joan G Schellinger; Michael J Bocek; Russell N Johnson; Suzie H Pun
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.