Literature DB >> 23383363

Outcomes following liver transplantation in intensive care unit patients.

Lena Sibulesky1, Michael G Heckman, C Burcin Taner, Juan M Canabal, Nancy N Diehl, Dana K Perry, Darren L Willingham, Surakit Pungpapong, Barry G Rosser, David J Kramer, Justin H Nguyen.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine feasibility of liver transplantation in patients from the intensive care unit (ICU) by estimating graft and patient survival.
METHODS: This single center retrospective study included 39 patients who had their first liver transplant directly from the intensive care unit and 927 non-ICU patients who were transplanted from hospital ward or home between January 2005 and December 2010.
RESULTS: In comparison to non-ICU patients, ICU patients had a higher model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) at transplant (median: 37 vs 20, P < 0.001). Fourteen out of 39 patients (36%) required vasopressor support immediately prior to liver transplantation (LT) with 6 patients (15%) requiring both vasopressin and norepinephrine. Sixteen ICU patients (41%) were ventilator dependent immediately prior to LT with 9 patients undergoing percutaneous tracheostomy prior to transplantation. Twenty-five ICU patients (64%) required dialysis preoperatively. At 1, 3 and 5 years after LT, graft survival was 76%, 68% and 62% in ICU patients vs 90%, 81% and 75% in non-ICU patients. Patient survival at 1, 3 and 5 years after LT was 78%, 70% and 65% in ICU patients vs 94%, 85% and 79% in non-ICU patients. When formally comparing graft survival and patient survival between ICU and non-ICU patients using Cox proportional hazards regression models, both graft survival [relative risk (RR): 1.94, 95%CI: 1.09-3.48, P = 0.026] and patient survival (RR: 2.32, 95%CI: 1.26-4.27, P = 0.007) were lower in ICU patients vs non-ICU patients in single variable analysis. These findings were consistent in multivariable analysis. Although not statistically significant, graft survival was worse in both patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis (RR: 3.29, P = 0.056) and patients who received donor after cardiac death (DCD) grafts (RR: 3.38, P = 0.060). These findings reached statistical significance when considering patient survival, which was worse for patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis (RR: 3.97, P = 0.031) and patients who were transplanted with DCD livers (RR: 4.19, P = 0.033). Graft survival and patient survival were not significantly worse for patients on mechanical ventilation (RR: 0.91, P = 0.88 in graft loss; RR: 0.69, P = 0.56 in death) or patients on vasopressors (RR: 1.06, P = 0.93 in graft loss; RR: 1.24, P = 0.74 in death) immediately prior to LT. Trends toward lower graft survival and patient survival were observed for patients on dialysis immediately before LT, however these findings did not approach statistical significance (RR: 1.70, P = 0.43 in graft loss; RR: 1.46, P = 0.58 in death).
CONCLUSION: Although ICU patients when compared to non-ICU patients have lower survivals, outcomes are still acceptable. Pre-transplant ventilation, hemodialysis, and vasopressors were not associated with adverse outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Donor outcomes; Donor pool; Liver graft survival; Onor after cardiac death grafts; Patient survival

Year:  2013        PMID: 23383363      PMCID: PMC3562723          DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v5.i1.26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Hepatol


  22 in total

1.  Prediction of survival outcome of ICU patients awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  A Sobhonslidsuk; G W Neff; E G Molina; N Yamashiki; S Nishida; K R Reddy; A G Tzakis; E R Schiff
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 2.  Management of critically-ill cirrhotic patients.

Authors:  Pere Ginès; Javier Fernández; François Durand; Faouzi Saliba
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 25.083

3.  The survival impact of liver transplantation in the MELD era, and the future for organ allocation and distribution.

Authors:  Robert S Brown; John R Lake
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Risk factors for graft survival after liver transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors: an analysis of OPTN/UNOS data.

Authors:  R Mateo; Y Cho; G Singh; M Stapfer; J Donovan; J Kahn; T-L Fong; L Sher; N Jabbour; S Aswad; R R Selby; Y Genyk
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  The survival benefit of deceased donor liver transplantation as a function of candidate disease severity and donor quality.

Authors:  D E Schaubel; C S Sima; N P Goodrich; S Feng; R M Merion
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Survival of liver transplant candidates with acute renal failure receiving renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Leslie P Wong; Molly P Blackley; Kenneth A Andreoni; Hyunsook Chin; Ronald J Falk; Philip J Klemmer
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis. II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates.

Authors:  P Peduzzi; J Concato; A R Feinstein; T R Holford
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Renal replacement therapy and orthotopic liver transplantation: the role of continuous veno-venous hemodialysis.

Authors:  T A Gonwa; M L Mai; L B Melton; S R Hays; R M Goldstein; M F Levy; G B Klintmalm
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2001-05-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 9.  When is a patient too well and when is a patient too sick for a liver transplant?

Authors:  Robert M Merion
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.799

10.  Predicting outcome after liver transplantation: utility of the model for end-stage liver disease and a newly derived discrimination function.

Authors:  Niraj M Desai; Kevin C Mange; Michael D Crawford; Peter L Abt; Adam M Frank; Joseph W Markmann; Ergun Velidedeoglu; William C Chapman; James F Markmann
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  3 in total

1.  Pretransplant Factors and Associations with Postoperative Respiratory Failure, ICU Length of Stay, and Short-Term Survival after Liver Transplantation in a High MELD Population.

Authors:  Mark R Pedersen; Myunghan Choi; Jeffrey A Brink; Anil B Seetharam
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2016-11-17

2.  Pre-Operative Delta-MELD is an Independent Predictor of Higher Mortality following Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  George Cholankeril; Andrew A Li; Brittany B Dennis; Chiranjeevi Gadiparthi; Donghee Kim; Alice E Toll; Benedict J Maliakkal; Sanjaya K Satapathy; Satheesh Nair; Aijaz Ahmed
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Acute on Chronic Liver Failure Based on EASL-CLIF Diagnostic Criteria.

Authors:  Abu Bakar H Bhatti; Faisal S Dar; Muhammad O Butt; Eraj Sahaab; Mohammad Salih; Najmul H Shah; Nusrat Y Khan; Haseeb H Zia; Eitzaz U Khan; Nasir A Khan
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2017-11-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.