Lael Werner1, Hanan Guzner-Gur, Iris Dotan. 1. IBD Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center affiliated with the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Abstract
Directional movement of cells in the human body is orchestrated via chemokines. This migration was initially identified in pathological and immunological processes but quickly extended to homeostatic cell trafficking. One such chemokine is the ubiquitous CXCL12 (initially called SDF1-α) which signals via the chemokine receptors CXCR4 and CXCR7. In the last decade CXCL12 was recognized to participate not only in embryonic development and homeostatic maintenance, but also in progression of inflammation. A role for CXCL12 and its receptors CXCR4 and CXCR7 in inflammatory bowel diseases was recently shown. The current review discusses up to date knowledge of CXCL12 in inflammation, focusing on the involvement of CXCL12 and its receptors, CXCR4 and CXCR7, in inflammatory bowel diseases.
Directional movement of cells in the human body is orchestrated via chemokines. This migration was initially identified in pathological and immunological processes but quickly extended to homeostatic cell trafficking. One such chemokine is the ubiquitous CXCL12 (initially called SDF1-α) which signals via the chemokine receptors CXCR4 and CXCR7. In the last decade CXCL12 was recognized to participate not only in embryonic development and homeostatic maintenance, but also in progression of inflammation. A role for CXCL12 and its receptors CXCR4 and CXCR7 in inflammatory bowel diseases was recently shown. The current review discusses up to date knowledge of CXCL12 in inflammation, focusing on the involvement of CXCL12 and its receptors, CXCR4 and CXCR7, in inflammatory bowel diseases.
Introduction: chemokines in homeostasis and inflammation
Movement of leukocytes from peripheral blood into and within tissues is critical for proper immune functions. This is mainly regulated by chemokines, and specific chemokine receptors. The large majority of approximately 50 human chemokines fall into the group of either CXC or CC chemokines on the basis of their N-terminal cysteine residues as reviewed extensively elsewhere 1. In addition to chemoattraction, chemokines participate in tissue homeostasis, embryonic development, haematopoiesis, and angiogenesis. They assist in the development of inflammatory responses; growth and survival of cancer cells, and the development of inflammatory responses 2-4. Although still a matter of debate5, chemo-attraction occurs via a concentration gradient of a specific soluble chemokine which binds to its specific chemokine receptor leading to a coordinated cascade of signal transduction resulting, in addition to chemotaxis, a wide range of functions required for host defense, including adhesion, respiratory burst, degranulation, and lipid mediator synthesis 6.CXCL12 (formerly Stromal-cell derived factor-alpha, SDF1-α) is a pleiotropic chemokine 7, 8 previously believed to be a homeostatic chemokine due to its ubiquitous expression in the bone marrow, lymph nodes, liver, lung, brain, heart, kidney, thymus, stomach and most abundantly in the pancreas, spleen, ovary and small intestine 9. Its role was thought to be exclusively as a regulator of normal leukocyte recirculation 8, 10, hematopoiesis 11 and infection of the HIV virus 12. However, more recently CXCL12 was discovered to be a participant in homing of progenitor leukocytes into the marrow microenvironment 13, as well as adaptive immune processes - for example, costimulation of CD4+ T cells activation and survival 14, 15. The current review will focus on the role of the chemokine CXCL12 and its receptors, CXCR4 and CXCR7, in inflammation, specifically intestinal, such as the one occurring in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
The CXCR4/CXCR7/CXCL12 axis in inflammation
CXCL12 binds to two known receptors, CXCR4 and CXCR7 10. The fundamental importance of this chemokine and its receptors CXCR4 and CXCR7 was shown when both CXCL12 16 and CXCR4 17 'knock-out' mice exhibited critical defects in leukocyte generation and hematopoiesis, leading to embryonic and neonatal fatalities. The phenotype and function of the CXCR4/CXCR7/CXCL12 trio in several immunological and auto-immune disorders was recently explored.In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), increased amounts of CXCL12 mRNA were found in RA synoviocytes 18, 19 and elevated CXCR4 expression by synovial memory T cells was reported 19, 20 suggesting that CXCL12/CXCR4 play a role in the recruitment of inflammatory cells to the joint. Noteworthy is the fact that although synovial 21 and plasma 22 CXCL12 levels were increased in RA, this did not correlate with disease activity nor with anti-inflammatory treatment, such as Methotrexate 22. Functionally, in both humans and a mouse model of arthritis, CXCR4 and CXCL12 were found to exert pro-inflammatory properties 23, 24. Furthermore, CXCR4 was a requisite for these pro-inflammatory effects, as observed by both the use of small molecule antagonists 24 and CXCR4 knock-out mice 25, both exhibiting reduced joint inflammation. The mechanism via which CXCR4-CXCL12 acts is still not entirely elucidated. However, data suggest that the influence of CXCR4 in RA is via accumulation of CD4+ T cells in synoviocytes 19, 23.CXCL12/CXCR4 interactions are also implicated in chronic lung inflammatory processes. In these disorders, CXCR4/CXCL12 were found to operate similarly to their mode of action in RA. CXCL12 was upregulated in the lung in both humans and animal models of lung inflammation 26, 27. It exhibits pro-inflammatory influence 26, 28 as observed by increased influx of CXCR4+ cells from the bone marrow to the lung. Small molecule inhibitors or neutralizing antibodies of CXCR4attenuated lung inflammation 28, 29, highlighting its critical involvement in the pathology of this disorder.However, in contrast to RA, mouse models of lung inflammation, induced either by aerosolized OVA or cockroach allergen, suggest CXCR4 mediates its influence via neutrophil recruitment to the lungs, and not T cells 26. Data in humans are still conflicting 30-32.Several other (auto)-immune disorders, such as systemic lupus erythematosus 33, 34, uveitis 35, and multiple sclerosis 36, 37, exhibit aberrant CXCR4/CXCL12-mediated inflammatory responses.
Chemokines in IBD
IBD, comprised of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), are chronic inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract that arise out of dysregulated immune system response to environmental triggers in genetically susceptible individuals 38.Growing body of evidence suggests that the chronic intestinal inflammation results from defects in the ability to properly regulate the immune system in response to enteric microbiota. These defects include alterations in chemokine and pattern recognition receptors expressed by epithelial cells. Thus, in addition to proper recognition of the gut microbiota, disease pathogenesis probably reflects defects in regulation of influx of inflammatory cells, mediated via chemokines 39, 40.Several chemokines and chemokine receptors are reported to be differentially regulated during active UC and CDFor example, CXCL8, and its receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2, exhibit increased expression by intestinal epithelial cells (IECs), macrophages, fibroblasts and neutrophils in the mucosa of IBD patients 41. In experimental mice models of IBD, the expression of the mouse homologs for CXCL8, CXCL1 and CXCL2, are increased and associated with pro-inflammatory activity 42 and CXCR2 antagonists inhibited intestinal inflammation in murine IBD models 43, 44.Another example is CCR9, expressed on intraepithelial and lamina propria T cells. CCR9 is involved in intestinal infiltration in IBD 45, probably by responding to CCL25, expressed by epithelial cells, specifically in the small intestine 46. Results from a phase II clinical trial using a CCR9 antagonist in CDpatients resulted in reduced disease severity 47. The suggested mode of this antagonist is via inhibition of influx of IL17-secreting T cells.Another chemokine which is targeted in a clinical trial for the treatment of IBD is CXCL10 48. In this phase II study, patients with active UC received either a fully human, monoclonal antibody to CXCL10 or placebo. After 8 weeks, patients receiving anti-CXCL10 exhibited improved clinical and histological responses, suggesting anti-CXCL10 is a potentially effective therapy for moderately-to-severely active UC.Other chemokines such as CXCL9, CXCL11, CCL2, CCL3, CCL4, CCL5, CCL7, CCL8 and CCL20 were also reported to be increased in IBD 41, 48 and are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1
Chemokines implicated in IBD, and their distribution in intestinal mucosa. IECs: intestinal epithelial cells; Mo: monocytes/macrophages; F: fibroblasts; N: neutrophils; NK: natural killers; Eo: Eosinophils; DC: dendritic cells; Ba: Basophils. * denotes weak interaction.
Chemokine
Previous name
Receptor
Secreted by
Cells attracted
CXCL8
IL8
CXCR1, CXCR2
IECs, Mo, F, N
IECs, Mo, F, N
CXCL9
MIG
CXCR3
DC, B, Mo
T, B, NK, Eo
CXCL10
IP10
CXCR3
DC, B, Mo
T, B, NK, Eo
CXCL11
ITAC
CXCR3, CXCR7
DC, B, Mo
T, B, NK, Eo
CCL2
MCP1
CCR2, CCR4*
F, Neurons
T, NK, Mo, DC
CCL3
MIP1α
CCR1, CCR3, CCR5
N, T, Mo, NK
Mo, T, DC, NK, Eo
CCL4
MIP1β
CCR5, CCR8*
B, T, NK
Mo, T, DC, NK
CCL5
RANTES
CCR1, CCR3, CCR5
Mo, IECs, T, platelets
Mo, T, DC, NK, Eo
CCL7
MCP3
CCR1, CCR2, CCR3
F, Mo
Mo, T, NK, Eo, Ba
CCL8
MCP2
CCR1, CCR2, CCR3, CCR5
F, Mo, IECs
Mo, Eo, T, NK, Ba
CCL20
MIP3α
CCR6
IECs, F
DC, T
CCL25
TECK
CCR9
IECs, DC
DC, Mo, T, B
CCL28
MEC
CCR2, CCR3, CCR10
IECs
T, Eo, B
CX3CL1
Fractalkine
CX3CR1
IECs, F, endothelial
NK, Mo, T
CXCR4/CXCR7/CXCL12 in IBD
CXCR4 and CXCL12 are expressed by IECs in the normal intestinal mucosa 49-51, contributing to IEC migration, barrier maturation, and restitution 52, via cAMP-mediated cellular functions 53. However, only recently has CXCR4/CXCL12's presence in intestinal tissue been extended to resident CXCR4+ lamina propria T cells (LPTs), and to the pathogenesis of IBD. We have recently reported that CXCL12 is expressed by normal IECs 54, and that CXCL12 was upregulated in IBD IECs (figure 1). Moreover, autologous biopsies of non-inflamed and inflamed UC mucosa, revealed upregulated CXCL12 in inflamed IECs. Ubiquitous CXCR4 expression by the intestinal mucosa, on both IECs and lamina propria mononuclear cells, was also demonstrated (figure 2). Although CXCR4 was constitutively expressed by both PBT and LPTs, we were able to find upregulated CXCR4 in IECs of IBD patients. Of note, Mikami et al. 55 suggest that CXCL12 is expressed by perivascular cells. These authors did not show epithelial CXCL12 expression, described by us and others in humans and by several groups in mice (49-54). This may be due to the different experimental approach, reagents and model system-specifically murine vs. human, Differences in mouse and human chemokines are widely reported. These differences might reflect either evolutionary pattern changes, or differing biological functions.
Figure 1
CXCL12 is expressed by IECs and upregulated in IBD. CXCL12 expression in tissue sections from IBD and normal mucosa (generated from patients undergoing bowel surgeries due to reasons other than IBD, such as colonic tumors or diverticular disease), was evaluated by imunohistochemistry. Paraffin-embedded histopathologic slides were fixed in formalin and stained with primary monoclonal antibody against CXCL12. (A) Low magnification (x4) of normal control (NL), UC, and CD intestine. (B) Distribution along the crypts. (C) Transition zone from less (thin arrow) to more (thick arrow) inflamed mucosa in UC.
Figure 2
CXCR4 in the intestinal mucosa is expressed by both IECs and mononuclear cells and is upregulated in IBD. (A) Low magnification (x4) slides from normal control (NL), and IBD (UC and CD) mucosa. (B) Representative transitional zone between a non-inflamed (small arrow) to an inflamed (big arrow) area in a UC patient. (C) Intensity of CXCR4 expression by IECs and mononuclear cells was arbitrarily graded by a blinded pathologist from 0 to 3 according to intensity of the CXCR4 staining (0 = lowest and 3 = highest intensity), averaging 3 randomly selected high-power fields. *P ≤0.03, **P≤0.01, and ***P≤0.05 all compared to normal.
Moreover, we showed that CXCL12 is a potent chemoattractant of Th1-biased, memory CD45RO+ peripheral blood T cells (PBTs) and LPTs, without differences between cells from either normal or IBD source 56. An accumulation of CXCR4+ cells in the vicinity of CXCL12-expressing IECs was observed. Taken together our findings suggest that CXCL12/CXCR4 interactions contribute to mucosal deregulation, specifically of memory CD45RO+ LPTs. Our findings suggest that therapeutic intervention targeting the CXCR4/CXCL12 axis could alleviate inflammation in IBD. Indeed, the potential of CXCR4 antagonists as a therapeutic modality in animal models and human disease was reported by several groups 41, 57, 58.Remarkably, in two different mouse model of colitis, a CXCR4 antagonist reduced the colonic inflammation as observed by decreased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and improved colonic pathology 58, 59.A third participant in the CXCL12 axis is the newly-discovered receptor CXCR7 60. However, despite a tenfold higher affinity of CXCL12 to CXCR7, than to CXCR4 60, 61; the precise role of CXCR7 in immune processes is yet unknown. We recently reported that in contrast to the ubiquitous expression of CXCR4 on T cells, only a small percentage of PBTs and LPTs express CXCR7 56. However, PBTs, but not LPTs, exhibited upregulated levels of CXCR7 in IBD (figure 3).
Figure 3
PBTs from IBD patients express more CXCR7 than normal PBTs. PBTs and LPTs from normal (NL), CD, and UC subjects were isolated. CXCR4 and CXCR7 expressions were assessed by flow cytometry. CXCR4 was highly expressed by PBTs and LPTs (>90% expression). CXCR7 was uniformly expressed by LPTs (~20% expression), but PBTs from IBD patients expressed more CXCR7 than normal PBTs. *P≤0.05 vs. normal PBTs.
As CXCR7 was reported to regulate CXCL12-mediated transendothelial migration 62, it is possible that the increased expression of CXCR7 in the peripheral blood of IBD patients could foster increased influx of T cells to sites of mucosal inflammation. Of note, this hypothesis was not supported when small molecule inhibitors of both these receptors were used to block migration towards CXCL12, and only CXCR4-, but not CXCR7-mediated migration was observed. In accordance with our findings, when CXCL12 was investigated in a mouse model of uveitis, CXCR4, but not CXCR7, was found to be the critical player in induction of remission of the uveitis 35. Possible roles which have been suggested for CXCR7 are either as a decoy receptor for CXCL12, or as a CXCR4-independent CXCL12 receptor, with a role in cell survival, or integrin activation 61, 63, 64. Of note, reports in other organ systems emphasized the importance of CXCR7 in CXCL12-mediated immune responses, as a small molecule inhibitor of CXCL12 interaction with both CXCR4 and CXCR7 inhibited chemotaxis of cells and possessed anti-inflammatory activity in the airways. 65.In conclusion, we reviewed the involvement of CXCL12 in IBD. We delved into the role of CXCR4/CXCR7/CXCL12 in inflammatory diseases, as well as their interactions and effects in IBD. These promising data will hopefully pave the way for future therapeutic interventions for the treatment of IBD.
Authors: Muriel Hachet-Haas; Karl Balabanian; François Rohmer; Françoise Pons; Christel Franchet; Sandra Lecat; Ken Y C Chow; Rania Dagher; Patrick Gizzi; Bruno Didier; Bernard Lagane; Esther Kellenberger; Dominique Bonnet; Françoise Baleux; Jacques Haiech; Marc Parmentier; Nelly Frossard; Fernando Arenzana-Seisdedos; Marcel Hibert; Jean-Luc Galzi Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2008-06-13 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Pasquale Buanne; Emma Di Carlo; Lorenzo Caputi; Laura Brandolini; Marco Mosca; Franca Cattani; Luigi Pellegrini; Leda Biordi; Gino Coletti; Carlo Sorrentino; Guido Fedele; Francesco Colotta; Gabriella Melillo; Riccardo Bertini Journal: J Leukoc Biol Date: 2007-07-26 Impact factor: 4.962
Authors: Joseph M Petty; Viranuj Sueblinvong; Christopher C Lenox; Christine C Jones; Gregory P Cosgrove; Carlyne D Cool; Pradeep R Rai; Kevin K Brown; Daniel J Weiss; Matthew E Poynter; Benjamin T Suratt Journal: J Immunol Date: 2007-06-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Jennifer M Burns; Bretton C Summers; Yu Wang; Anita Melikian; Rob Berahovich; Zhenhua Miao; Mark E T Penfold; Mary Jean Sunshine; Dan R Littman; Calvin J Kuo; Kevin Wei; Brian E McMaster; Kim Wright; Maureen C Howard; Thomas J Schall Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2006-08-28 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Ahmed Al-Dwairi; Mohammad Alqudah; Othman Al-Shboul; Mahmoud Alfaqih; Dana Alomari Journal: Exp Ther Med Date: 2018-05-25 Impact factor: 2.447
Authors: Susana Paredes-Zúñiga; Rodrigo A Morales; Salomé Muñoz-Sánchez; Carlos Muñoz-Montecinos; Margarita Parada; Karina Tapia; Carlos Rubilar; Miguel L Allende; Oscar A Peña Journal: Immunogenetics Date: 2017-02-20 Impact factor: 2.846