C A Emdin1, P Millson. 1. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Health Science Building, 6th floor, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada. connor.emdin@utoronto.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Task shifting, defined for this review as the shifting of ART initiation and management from physicians to nurses, has been proposed as a possible method to increase access to HIV treatment in Sub-Saharan Africa. OBJECTIVE: To critically evaluate the literature on task shifting, determining if there is evidence to support this view. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was undertaken, with both peer reviewed publications and conference abstracts presenting original data eligible for inclusion. Studies were evaluated according to methodology and discussion of confounding factors. RESULTS: We identified 25 articles which evaluated the effect of task shifting on access to ART. The evidence was mixed. Although there is a significant body of field reports indicating that task shifting increases access, these studies were of low methodological quality. The only randomized controlled trial included in this review did not find that task shifting increased in access. CONCLUSION: Task shifting appears to be most effective at increasing access when combined with other interventions and financial support. There is a need for more research into the effects of task shifting policies, especially randomized controlled trials and high quality cohort studies.
BACKGROUND: Task shifting, defined for this review as the shifting of ART initiation and management from physicians to nurses, has been proposed as a possible method to increase access to HIV treatment in Sub-Saharan Africa. OBJECTIVE: To critically evaluate the literature on task shifting, determining if there is evidence to support this view. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was undertaken, with both peer reviewed publications and conference abstracts presenting original data eligible for inclusion. Studies were evaluated according to methodology and discussion of confounding factors. RESULTS: We identified 25 articles which evaluated the effect of task shifting on access to ART. The evidence was mixed. Although there is a significant body of field reports indicating that task shifting increases access, these studies were of low methodological quality. The only randomized controlled trial included in this review did not find that task shifting increased in access. CONCLUSION: Task shifting appears to be most effective at increasing access when combined with other interventions and financial support. There is a need for more research into the effects of task shifting policies, especially randomized controlled trials and high quality cohort studies.
Keywords:
access to HIV treatment; antiretroviral therapy; nurse provided treatment; substitution of physicians; task shifting
Authors: Alana T Brennan; Lawrence Long; Mhairi Maskew; Ian Sanne; Imogen Jaffray; Patrick MacPhail; Matthew P Fox Journal: AIDS Date: 2011-10-23 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Fabienne Shumbusho; Johan van Griensven; David Lowrance; Innocent Turate; Mark A Weaver; Jessica Price; Agnes Binagwaho Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2009-10-13 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Mary B Morris; Bushimbwa Tambatamba Chapula; Benjamin H Chi; Albert Mwango; Harmony F Chi; Joyce Mwanza; Handson Manda; Carolyn Bolton; Debra S Pankratz; Jeffrey S A Stringer; Stewart E Reid Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-01-09 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Anne F Luetkemeyer; Michelle A Kendall; Mulinda Nyirenda; Xingye Wu; Prudence Ive; Constance A Benson; Janet W Andersen; Susan Swindells; Ian M Sanne; Diane V Havlir; Johnstone Kumwenda Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2014-04-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Lena R Brandt; Liliana Hidalgo; Francisco Diez-Canseco; Ricardo Araya; David C Mohr; Paulo R Menezes; J Jaime Miranda Journal: JMIR Ment Health Date: 2019-06-18