Literature DB >> 23382629

Endoscopic ultrasound evaluation in the surgical treatment of duodenal and peri-ampullary adenomas.

Lilian C Azih1, Brett L Broussard, Milind A Phadnis, Martin J Heslin, Mohamad A Eloubeidi, Shayam Varadarajulu, Juan Pablo Arnoletti.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for predicting depth of mucosal invasion and to analyze outcomes following endoscopic and transduodenal resection.
METHODS: Records of 111 patients seen at our institution from November 1999 to July 2011 with the post-operative pathological diagnosis of benign ampullary and duodenal adenomas were reviewed. Records of patients who underwent preoperative EUS for diagnostic purposes were identified. The accuracy of EUS in predicting the absence of muscular invasion was assessed by comparing EUS reports to the final surgical pathological results. In addition, the incidence of the post-operative complications over a period of 30 d and the subsequent long-term outcome (recurrence) over a period of 30 mo associated with endoscopic and transduodenal surgical resection was recorded, compared and analyzed.
RESULTS: Among 111 patients with benign ampullary and duodenal adenomas, 47 underwent preoperative EUS for 29 peri-ampullary lesions and 18 duodenal lesions. In addition, computed tomography was performed in 18 patients, endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography in 10 patients and esophagogastroduodenoscopy in 22 patients. There were 43 patients with sporadic adenomas and 4 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)/other polyposis syndromes. In 38 (81%, P < 0.05) patients, EUS reliably identified absence of submucosal and muscularis invasion. In 4 cases, EUS underestimated submucosal invasion that was proven by pathology. In the other 5 patients, EUS predicted muscularis invasion which could not be demonstrated in the resected specimen. EUS predicted tumor muscularis invasion with a specificity of 88% and negative predictive value of 90% (P < 0.05). Types of resection performed included endoscopic resection in 22 cases, partial duodenectomy in 9 cases, transduodenal ampullectomy with sphincteroplasty in 10 cases and pancreaticoduodenectomy in 6 cases. The main post-operative final pathological results included villous adenoma (n = 5), adenoma (n = 8), tubulovillous adenoma (n = 10), tubular adenoma (n = 20) and hyperplastic polyp (n = 2). Among the 47 patients who underwent resection, 8 (17%, 5 of which corresponded to surgical resection) developed post-procedural complications which included retroperitoneal hematoma, intra-abdominal abscess, wound infection, delayed gastric emptying and prolonged ileus. After median follow-up of 20 mo there were 6 local recurrences (13%, median follow-up = 20 mo) 4 of which were in patients with FAP.
CONCLUSION: EUS accurately predicts the depth of mucosal invasion in suspected benign ampullary and duodenal adenomas. These patients can safely undergo endoscopic or local resection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cholangio-pancreatography; Duodenal periampullary adenoma; Endoscopic ultrasound; Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23382629      PMCID: PMC3558574          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  26 in total

1.  Local excision of periampullary villous tumours of the duodenum.

Authors:  G H Sakorafas; M G Sarr
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  Local resection or pancreaticoduodenectomy for villous adenoma of the ampulla of Vater diagnosed before operation.

Authors:  D L Cahen; P Fockens; L T de Wit; G J Offerhaus; H Obertop; D J Gouma
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  The use of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of carcinoma of the papilla of Vater.

Authors:  K Yasuda; H Mukai; E Cho; M Nakajima; K Kawai
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Preoperative evaluation of periampullary tumors by endoscopic sonography, transabdominal sonography, and computed tomography.

Authors:  C H Chen; L J Tseng; C C Yang; Y H Yeh
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.910

5.  Diagnosis and therapy for ampullary tumors: 63 cases.

Authors:  B Chareton; J Coiffic; S Landen; E Bardaxoglou; J P Campion; B Launois
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  The role of endoscopic ultrasonography in diagnosis of benign lesions of the upper GI tract.

Authors:  N Kalantzis; F Laoudi; G Kallimanis; P Gabriel; N Farmakis
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 7.  Local resection for ampullary tumors. Is there a place for it?

Authors:  H J Asbun; R L Rossi; J L Munson
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-05

Review 8.  Endoscopic papillectomy.

Authors:  Lyndon V Hernandez; Marc F Catalano
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.287

9.  Factors predictive of survival in ampullary carcinoma.

Authors:  J R Howe; D S Klimstra; R D Moccia; K C Conlon; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Defining the criteria for local resection of ampullary neoplasms.

Authors:  D W Rattner; C Fernandez-del Castillo; W R Brugge; A L Warshaw
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1996-04
View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic management of adenomatous ampullary lesions.

Authors:  Jesús Espinel; Eugenia Pinedo; Vanesa Ojeda; Maria Guerra Del Rio
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2015-09-26

2.  Pancreas-preserving duodenectomy is a safe alternative to high-risk pancreatoduodenectomy for premalignant duodenal lesions.

Authors:  Elena Rangelova; John Blomberg; Christoph Ansorge; Lars Lundell; Ralf Segersvärd; Marco Del Chiaro
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Robotic surgery for benign duodenal tumors.

Authors:  Stephanie Downs-Canner; Wald J Van der Vliet; Stijn J J Thoolen; Brian A Boone; Amer H Zureikat; Melissa E Hogg; David L Bartlett; Mark P Callery; Tara S Kent; Herbert J Zeh; A James Moser
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Performance characteristics of EUS for locoregional evaluation of ampullary lesions.

Authors:  Wiriyaporn Ridtitid; Suzette E Schmidt; Mohammad A Al-Haddad; Julia LeBlanc; John M DeWitt; Lee McHenry; Evan L Fogel; James L Watkins; Glen A Lehman; Stuart Sherman; Gregory A Coté
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  Endoscopic papillectomy: indications, techniques, and results.

Authors:  Giovanni D De Palma
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Tubulopapillary adenoma of the common bile duct presenting with jaundice.

Authors:  Kenan Yusif-Zade; Jamal Musayev; Maryam Yeler
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2015-07-10

7.  Pancreas-preserving partial duodenectomy of the distal region for large duodenal adenoma: report of a case.

Authors:  Kenji Shimizu; Daisuke Hashimoto; Shinya Abe; Akira Chikamoto; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 8.  Primary small bowel adenomas and adenocarcinomas-recent advances.

Authors:  Aoife Maguire; Kieran Sheahan
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 9.  Endoscopic management of duodenal adenomatosis in familial adenomatous polyposis-A case-based review.

Authors:  E Soons; T M Bisseling; M C A van Kouwen; G Möslein; P D Siersema
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.623

10.  Characteristic endoscopic ultrasound findings of ampullary lesions that predict the need for surgical excision or endoscopic ampullectomy.

Authors:  Jared J Rejeski; Sarba Kundu; Matthew Hauser; Jason D Conway; John A Evans; Rishi Pawa; Girish Mishra
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.