BACKGROUND: Racial minorities typically have less exposure than non-minorities to antihypertensive medications across an array of cardiovascular conditions in the general population. However, cumulative exposure has not been investigated in dialysis patients. METHODS: In a longitudinal analysis of 38,381 hypertensive dialysis patients, prescription drug data from Medicaid was linked to Medicare data contained in United States Renal Data System core data, creating a national cohort of dialysis patients dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid services. The proportion of days covered (PDC) was calculated to determine cumulative exposure to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), β-blockers, and calcium-channel blockers (CCDs). The factors associated with use of these medications were modeled through weighted linear regression, with derivation of the adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for exposure. RESULTS: Relative to non-Hispanic Caucasians, African-American, Hispanic, or Other race/ethnicity were significantly associated with less exposure to β-blockers (AOR 0.56-0.69, P < 0.001 in each case) and CCBs (AOR 0.84-0.85, P < 0.001 in each case); African-American race and Hispanic ethnicity had AORs of 0.78 and 0.73 for ACEIs and ARBs, respectively (P < 0.001 in both cases). Collectively, the odds of exposure to each class of medication for minorities was about three-quarters of that for Caucasians. CONCLUSIONS: Given that dually Medicare-and-Medicaid-eligible dialysis patients have insurance coverage for prescription medications as well as regular contact with health care providers, differences by race in exposure to antihypertensive medications should with time be minimal among patients who are candidates for these drugs. The causes of differences by race in exposure to antihypertensive medications over the course of time should be further examined.
BACKGROUND: Racial minorities typically have less exposure than non-minorities to antihypertensive medications across an array of cardiovascular conditions in the general population. However, cumulative exposure has not been investigated in dialysis patients. METHODS: In a longitudinal analysis of 38,381 hypertensive dialysis patients, prescription drug data from Medicaid was linked to Medicare data contained in United States Renal Data System core data, creating a national cohort of dialysis patients dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid services. The proportion of days covered (PDC) was calculated to determine cumulative exposure to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), β-blockers, and calcium-channel blockers (CCDs). The factors associated with use of these medications were modeled through weighted linear regression, with derivation of the adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for exposure. RESULTS: Relative to non-Hispanic Caucasians, African-American, Hispanic, or Other race/ethnicity were significantly associated with less exposure to β-blockers (AOR 0.56-0.69, P < 0.001 in each case) and CCBs (AOR 0.84-0.85, P < 0.001 in each case); African-American race and Hispanic ethnicity had AORs of 0.78 and 0.73 for ACEIs and ARBs, respectively (P < 0.001 in both cases). Collectively, the odds of exposure to each class of medication for minorities was about three-quarters of that for Caucasians. CONCLUSIONS: Given that dually Medicare-and-Medicaid-eligible dialysis patients have insurance coverage for prescription medications as well as regular contact with health care providers, differences by race in exposure to antihypertensive medications should with time be minimal among patients who are candidates for these drugs. The causes of differences by race in exposure to antihypertensive medications over the course of time should be further examined.
Authors: James B Wetmore; Jonathan D Mahnken; Purna Mukhopadhyay; Qingjiang Hou; Edward F Ellerbeck; Sally K Rigler; John A Spertus; Theresa I Shireman Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2011-05-31 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: B M Brenner; M E Cooper; D de Zeeuw; W F Keane; W E Mitch; H H Parving; G Remuzzi; S M Snapinn; Z Zhang; S Shahinfar Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-09-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Suzanne V Arnold; Paul S Chan; Philip G Jones; Carole Decker; Donna M Buchanan; Harlan M Krumholz; P Michael Ho; John A Spertus Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2011-07
Authors: Kevin E Chan; T Alp Ikizler; Jorge L Gamboa; Chang Yu; Raymond M Hakim; Nancy J Brown Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2011-07-20 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Bryan Kestenbaum; Daniel L Gillen; Donald J Sherrard; Steven Seliger; Adrianne Ball; Catherine Stehman-Breen Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Sverre E Kjeldsen; Björn Dahlöf; Richard B Devereux; Stevo Julius; Peter Aurup; Jonathan Edelman; Gareth Beevers; Ulf de Faire; Frej Fyhrquist; Hans Ibsen; Krister Kristianson; Ole Lederballe-Pedersen; Lars H Lindholm; Markku S Nieminen; Per Omvik; Suzanne Oparil; Steven Snapinn; Hans Wedel Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-09-25 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Joshua S Benner; Robert J Glynn; Helen Mogun; Peter J Neumann; Milton C Weinstein; Jerry Avorn Journal: JAMA Date: 2002 Jul 24-31 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: James B Wetmore; Jonathan D Mahnken; Milind A Phadnis; Edward F Ellerbeck; Theresa I Shireman Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Theresa I Shireman; Jonathan D Mahnken; Milind A Phadnis; Edward F Ellerbeck Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2016-03-25 Impact factor: 2.298