Literature DB >> 23382244

Differential requirements for mRNA folding partially explain why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly.

Chungoo Park1, Xiaoshu Chen, Jian-Rong Yang, Jianzhi Zhang.   

Abstract

The cause of the tremendous among-protein variation in the rate of sequence evolution is a central subject of molecular evolution. Expression level has been identified as a leading determinant of this variation among genes encoded in the same genome, but the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. We here propose and demonstrate that a requirement for stronger folding of more abundant mRNAs results in slower evolution of more highly expressed genes and proteins. Specifically, we show that: (i) the higher the expression level of a gene, the greater the selective pressure for its mRNA to fold; (ii) random mutations are more likely to decrease mRNA folding when occurring in highly expressed genes than in lowly expressed genes; and (iii) amino acid substitution rate is negatively correlated with mRNA folding strength, with or without the control of expression level. Furthermore, synonymous (d(S)) and nonsynonymous (d(N)) nucleotide substitution rates are both negatively correlated with mRNA folding strength. However, counterintuitively, d(S) and d(N) are differentially constrained by selection for mRNA folding, resulting in a significant correlation between mRNA folding strength and d(N)/d(S), even when gene expression level is controlled. The direction and magnitude of this correlation is determined primarily by the G+C frequency at third codon positions. Together, these findings explain why highly expressed genes evolve slowly, demonstrate a major role of natural selection at the mRNA level in constraining protein evolution, and reveal a previously unrecognized and unexpected form of nonprotein-level selection that impacts d(N)/d(S).

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23382244      PMCID: PMC3581962          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1218066110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  57 in total

1.  mRNAs have greater negative folding free energies than shuffled or codon choice randomized sequences.

Authors:  W Seffens; D Digby
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Protein dispensability and rate of evolution.

Authors:  A E Hirsh; H B Fraser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution.

Authors:  D Allan Drummond; Claus O Wilke
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  The relationship among gene expression, the evolution of gene dosage, and the rate of protein evolution.

Authors:  Jean-François Gout; Daniel Kahn; Laurent Duret
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  A universal trend of reduced mRNA stability near the translation-initiation site in prokaryotes and eukaryotes.

Authors:  Wanjun Gu; Tong Zhou; Claus O Wilke
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Comparative analyses of the secondary structures of synthetic and intracellular yeast MFA2 mRNAs.

Authors:  M J Doktycz; F W Larimer; M Pastrnak; A Stevens
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The developmental transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Brenton R Graveley; Angela N Brooks; Joseph W Carlson; Michael O Duff; Jane M Landolin; Li Yang; Carlo G Artieri; Marijke J van Baren; Nathan Boley; Benjamin W Booth; James B Brown; Lucy Cherbas; Carrie A Davis; Alex Dobin; Renhua Li; Wei Lin; John H Malone; Nicolas R Mattiuzzo; David Miller; David Sturgill; Brian B Tuch; Chris Zaleski; Dayu Zhang; Marco Blanchette; Sandrine Dudoit; Brian Eads; Richard E Green; Ann Hammonds; Lichun Jiang; Phil Kapranov; Laura Langton; Norbert Perrimon; Jeremy E Sandler; Kenneth H Wan; Aarron Willingham; Yu Zhang; Yi Zou; Justen Andrews; Peter J Bickel; Steven E Brenner; Michael R Brent; Peter Cherbas; Thomas R Gingeras; Roger A Hoskins; Thomas C Kaufman; Brian Oliver; Susan E Celniker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Expression level, evolutionary rate, and the cost of expression.

Authors:  Joshua L Cherry
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Global or local? Predicting secondary structure and accessibility in mRNAs.

Authors:  Sita J Lange; Daniel Maticzka; Mathias Möhl; Joshua N Gagnon; Chris M Brown; Rolf Backofen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Why is the correlation between gene importance and gene evolutionary rate so weak?

Authors:  Zhi Wang; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  55 in total

1.  Expression Differentiation Is Constrained to Low-Expression Proteins over Ecological Timescales.

Authors:  Mark J Margres; Kenneth P Wray; Margaret Seavy; James J McGivern; Nathanael D Herrera; Darin R Rokyta
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Human coding RNA editing is generally nonadaptive.

Authors:  Guixia Xu; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Protein Melting Temperature Cannot Fully Assess Whether Protein Folding Free Energy Underlies the Universal Abundance-Evolutionary Rate Correlation Seen in Proteins.

Authors:  Rostam M Razban
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Secreted Proteins Defy the Expression Level-Evolutionary Rate Anticorrelation.

Authors:  Felix Feyertag; Patricia M Berninsone; David Alvarez-Ponce
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 5.  Genetic drift, selection and the evolution of the mutation rate.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; Matthew S Ackerman; Jean-Francois Gout; Hongan Long; Way Sung; W Kelley Thomas; Patricia L Foster
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Biophysics of protein evolution and evolutionary protein biophysics.

Authors:  Tobias Sikosek; Hue Sun Chan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Richard Dickerson, Molecular Clocks, and Rates of Protein Evolution.

Authors:  David Alvarez-Ponce
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Genome-wide maps of ribosomal occupancy provide insights into adaptive evolution and regulatory roles of uORFs during Drosophila development.

Authors:  Hong Zhang; Shengqian Dou; Feng He; Junjie Luo; Liping Wei; Jian Lu
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Predictive biophysical modeling and understanding of the dynamics of mRNA translation and its evolution.

Authors:  Hadas Zur; Tamir Tuller
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  No gene-specific optimization of mutation rate in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Xiaoshu Chen; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.