Literature DB >> 23381988

Comparative acute and chronic sensitivity of fish and amphibians: a critical review of data.

Lennart Weltje1, Peter Simpson, Melanie Gross, Mark Crane, James R Wheeler.   

Abstract

The relative sensitivity of amphibians to chemicals in the environment, including plant protection product active substances, is the subject of ongoing scientific debate. The objective of this study was to compare systematically the relative sensitivity of amphibians and fish to chemicals. Acute and chronic toxicity data were obtained from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) ECOTOX database and were supplemented with data from the scientific and regulatory literature. The overall outcome is that fish and amphibian toxicity data are highly correlated and that fish are more sensitive (both acute and chronic) than amphibians. In terms of acute sensitivity, amphibians were between 10- and 100-fold more sensitive than fish for only four of 55 chemicals and more than 100-fold more sensitive for only two chemicals. However, a detailed inspection of these cases showed a similar acute sensitivity of fish and amphibians. Chronic toxicity data for fish were available for 52 chemicals. Amphibians were between 10- and 100-fold more sensitive than fish for only two substances (carbaryl and dexamethasone) and greater than 100-fold more sensitive for only a single chemical (sodium perchlorate). The comparison for carbaryl was subsequently determined to be unreliable and that for sodium perchlorate is a potential artifact of the exposure medium. Only a substance such as dexamethasone, which interferes with a specific aspect of amphibian metamorphosis, might not be detected using fish tests. However, several other compounds known to influence amphibian metamorphosis were included in the analysis, and these did not affect amphibians disproportionately. These analyses suggest that additional amphibian testing is not necessary during chemical risk assessment.
Copyright © 2013 SETAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23381988     DOI: 10.1002/etc.2149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  12 in total

1.  Survival and development of bullfrog tadpoles in microcosms treated with abamectin.

Authors:  Ana M Vasconcelos; Michiel A Daam; Juliana C de Resende; Maressa P Casali-Pereira; Evaldo L G Espíndola
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Acute and chronic sensitivity, avoidance behavior and sensitive life stages of bullfrog tadpoles exposed to the biopesticide abamectin.

Authors:  Ana M Vasconcelos; Michiel A Daam; Liliana R A dos Santos; Ana L M Sanches; Cristiano V M Araújo; Evaldo L G Espíndola
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Acute toxicity of copper to the larval stage of three species of ambystomatid salamanders.

Authors:  Scott M Weir; Shuangying Yu; David E Scott; Stacey L Lance
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Validity of fish, birds and mammals as surrogates for amphibians and reptiles in pesticide toxicity assessment.

Authors:  Manuel E Ortiz-Santaliestra; Joao P Maia; Andrés Egea-Serrano; Isabel Lopes
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Simulated developmental and reproductive impacts on amphibian populations and implications for assessing long-term effects.

Authors:  Jill A Awkerman; Sandy Raimondo
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 6.291

6.  Effects of a commonly used glyphosate-based herbicide formulation on early developmental stages of two anuran species.

Authors:  Norman Wagner; Hendrik Müller; Bruno Viertel
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Using metabolomic profiling to inform use of surrogate species in ecological risk assessment practices.

Authors:  Roland F Seim; Donna A Glinski; Candice M Lavelle; Jill A Awkerman; Becky L Hemmer; Peggy Harris; Sandy Raimondo; Marcía N Snyder; Brad W Acrey; S Thomas Purucker; Denise K MacMillan; Amanda A Brennan; W Matthew Henderson
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol Part D Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.674

8.  Guidance for Developing Amphibian Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Jill Awkerman; Sandy Raimondo; Amelie Schmolke; Nika Galic; Pamela Rueda-Cediel; Katherine Kapo; Chiara Accolla; Maxime Vaugeois; Valery Forbes
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Amphibians and plant-protection products: what research and action is needed?

Authors:  Annette Aldrich; Marion Junghans; Caroline Aeberli; Carsten A Brühl; Franz Streissl; Benedikt R Schmidt
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 5.893

10.  Adaption of a dermal in vitro method to investigate the uptake of chemicals across amphibian skin.

Authors:  Katharina Kaufmann; Peter Dohmen
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 5.893

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.