Literature DB >> 23381823

Cutaneous ureterostomy with definitive ureteral stent as urinary diversion option in unfit patients after radical cystectomy.

Lucas Nogueira1, Rodolfo Borges dos Reis, Roberto Dias Machado, Marcos Tobias-Machado, Gustavo Carvalhal, Celso Freitas, Wesley Magnabosco, Conrado Leonel Menezes, Carlos Corradi, Leonardo Oliveira Reis, Adauto Cologna, Antonio Antunes Rodrigues Junior, Eliney Ferreira Faria.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Simple diversions are underutilized, mostly for unfit, bedridden, and very self-limited patients requiring palliative surgical management due to life-threatening conditions. Experience with cutaneous ureterostomy (CU) as palliative urinary diversion option for unfit bladder cancer patients is reported.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and operative parameters of 41 patients who underwent CU following RC in three specialized Cancer Centers from July/2005 to July/2010. Muscle-invasive disease (clinical Stage T2/worse), multifocal high-grade tumor, and carcinoma in situ refractory to intravesical immunotherapy were the main indications for RC. Double-J ureteral stents were used in all patients and replaced every 6 months indefinitely. Peri-operative morbidity and mortality were evaluated.
RESULTS: Median age was 69 years (interquartile range--IQR 62, 76); 30 (73%) patients were men. Surgery in urgency setting was performed in 25 (61%) of patients, most due to severe bleeding associated with hemodynamic instability; 14 patients (34%) showed an American Society of Anesthesiologists score 4. Median operative time was 180 minutes (IQR 120, 180). Peri-operative complications occurred in 30 (73%) patients, most Clavien grade I and II (66.6 %). There was no per-operative death. Re-intervention was necessary in 7 (17%) patients. Overall survival was 24% after 9.4 months follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: CU with definitive ureteral stenting represents a simplified alternative for urinary diversion after palliative cystectomy in unfit patients. It can be performed quickly, with few early and late postoperative complications allowing RC in a group of patients otherwise limited to suboptimal alternatives. Future studies regarding the quality of life are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23381823     DOI: 10.1590/s0102-86502013001300009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Cir Bras        ISSN: 0102-8650            Impact factor:   1.388


  4 in total

1.  A modified cutaneous ureterostomy provides satisfactory short and midterm outcomes in select cases.

Authors:  Priyank Yadav; Varun Mittal; Pankaj Gaur; Devarshi Srivastava; Sanjoy Kumar Sureka; Anil Mandhani
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-03-06

2.  Comparison of survival in elderly patients treated with uretero-cutaneostomy or ileal conduit after radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Shang Huang; Hanzhong Chen; Teng Li; Xiaoyong Pu; Jiumin Liu; Xuecheng Bi
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.921

3.  Evaluation of Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life in Elderly Patients (>75 y.o.) Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Cystectomy with Single Stoma Ureterocutaneostomy vs. Bricker Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion.

Authors:  Andrea Fuschi; Yazan Al Salhi; Manfredi Bruno Sequi; Gennaro Velotti; Alessia Martoccia; Paolo Pietro Suraci; Silvio Scalzo; Anastasios Asimakopoulos; Giorgio Bozzini; Alessandro Zucchi; Cosimo De Nunzio; Antonio Carbone; Antonio Luigi Pastore
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 4.  Bricker ileal conduit vs. Cutaneous ureterostomy after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Fernando Korkes; Eduardo Fernandes; Felipe Arakaki Gushiken; Felipe Placco Araujo Glina; Willy Baccaglini; Frederico Timóteo; Sidney Glina
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.