Literature DB >> 23381796

A decision-analysis tool for benefit-risk assessment of nonprescription drugs.

Eric P Brass, Ragnar Lofstedt, Ortwin Renn.   

Abstract

A decision analysis tool is proposed for regulatory assessment of nonprescription drugs. The tool is based on evaluation of each of the drug's potential benefit and risk attributes identified using a value-tree framework. The decision tool is designed as two-factor, two-stage instrument. Each attribute is independently assessed based on both the frequency of occurrence and clinical impact of the attribute. Frequency and clinical impact are scored on a 0-3 scale where a 0 score means no occurrence or no clinical impact, and a 3 means high frequency of occurrence or high clinical impact. The tool is initially used early in drug development to facilitate communication amongst stakeholders and to identify important data gaps. After new data are generated during the development program the tool is used again across the same attributes to yield a final benefit-risk assessment. In both the early assessment and subsequent evaluation use of the Group-Delphi technique and a benefit-risk trade-off heuristic may yield more consistent and coherent outputs. The tool allows regulators to maintain flexibility with respect to how final decisions are made, yet allows specificity and transparency during the evaluation. Further modifications can be incorporated to address drug-specific requirements or regulatory preferences.
© The Author(s) 2013.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23381796     DOI: 10.1002/jcph.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  3 in total

Review 1.  Assessing the value of healthcare interventions using multi-criteria decision analysis: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Kevin Marsh; Tereza Lanitis; David Neasham; Panagiotis Orfanos; Jaime Caro
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Why are self-medication opportunities limited in Austria? An interview study and comparison with other countries.

Authors:  Natalie J Gauld; Christoph A Baumgärtel; Stephen A Buetow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Assessing the benefit-risk for new drugs: are the FDA's Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee and the Division of Metabolism and Endocrinology Products in sync?

Authors:  Eric P Brass
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 19.112

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.