BACKGROUND: Although weight cycling is frequent in obese patients, the adverse consequences on body composition and an increased propensity to weight gain remain controversial. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effect of intentional weight loss and spontaneous regain on fat distribution, the composition of lean mass and resting energy expenditure (REE). DESIGN: Weight regainers (≥ 30% of loss, n=27) and weight-stable subjects (within <± 20% of weight change, n=20) were selected from 103 overweight and obese subjects (body mass index 28-43 kg m(-2), 24-45 years) who passed a 13-week low-calorie diet intervention. REE and body composition (by densitometry and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging) were examined at baseline, after weight loss and at 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Mean weight loss was -12.3 ± 3.3 kg in weight-stable subjects and -9.0 ± 4.3 kg in weight regainers (P<0.01). Weight regain was incomplete, accounting for 83 and 42% of weight loss in women and men. Regain in total fat and different adipose tissue depots was in proportion to weight regain except for a higher regain in adipose tissue of the extremities in women and a lower regain in extremity and visceral adipose tissue in men. In both genders, regain in skeletal muscle of the trunk lagged behind skeletal muscle regain at the extremities. In contrast to weight-stable subjects, weight regainers showed a reduced REE adjusted for changes in organ and tissue masses after weight loss (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Weight regain did not adversely affect body fat distribution. Weight loss-associated adaptations in REE may impair weight loss and contribute to weight regain.
BACKGROUND: Although weight cycling is frequent in obesepatients, the adverse consequences on body composition and an increased propensity to weight gain remain controversial. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effect of intentional weight loss and spontaneous regain on fat distribution, the composition of lean mass and resting energy expenditure (REE). DESIGN: Weight regainers (≥ 30% of loss, n=27) and weight-stable subjects (within <± 20% of weight change, n=20) were selected from 103 overweight and obese subjects (body mass index 28-43 kg m(-2), 24-45 years) who passed a 13-week low-calorie diet intervention. REE and body composition (by densitometry and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging) were examined at baseline, after weight loss and at 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Mean weight loss was -12.3 ± 3.3 kg in weight-stable subjects and -9.0 ± 4.3 kg in weight regainers (P<0.01). Weight regain was incomplete, accounting for 83 and 42% of weight loss in women and men. Regain in total fat and different adipose tissue depots was in proportion to weight regain except for a higher regain in adipose tissue of the extremities in women and a lower regain in extremity and visceral adipose tissue in men. In both genders, regain in skeletal muscle of the trunk lagged behind skeletal muscle regain at the extremities. In contrast to weight-stable subjects, weight regainers showed a reduced REE adjusted for changes in organ and tissue masses after weight loss (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Weight regain did not adversely affect body fat distribution. Weight loss-associated adaptations in REE may impair weight loss and contribute to weight regain.
Authors: Sascha Heinitz; Tim Hollstein; Takafumi Ando; Mary Walter; Alessio Basolo; Jonathan Krakoff; Susanne B Votruba; Paolo Piaggi Journal: Metabolism Date: 2020-06-27 Impact factor: 8.694
Authors: E Poggiogalle; C Lubrano; G Sergi; A Coin; L Gnessi; S Mariani; A Lenzi; L M Donini Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2016 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Dympna Gallagher; David E Kelley; John Thornton; Lawrence Boxt; Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Edward Lipkin; Ebenezer Nyenwe; Isaiah Janumala; Stanley Heshka Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2016-11-23 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Erin Fothergill; Juen Guo; Lilian Howard; Jennifer C Kerns; Nicolas D Knuth; Robert Brychta; Kong Y Chen; Monica C Skarulis; Mary Walter; Peter J Walter; Kevin D Hall Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2016-05-02 Impact factor: 5.002