Literature DB >> 23381491

Factors affecting successful localization of the central sulcus using the somatosensory evoked potential phase reversal technique.

Sameer A Sheth1, Christine A Eckhardt, Brian P Walcott, Emad N Eskandar, Mirela V Simon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Perirolandic surgery is associated with an increased risk of postoperative neurological deficit that can be reduced by accurate recognition of the location of sensorimotor cortex. The median somatosensory evoked potential (MSSEP) phase reversal technique (PRT) reliably identifies the central sulcus (CS) intraoperatively, but does require additional surgical time. Awareness of factors that lengthen the time required for MSSEP PRT has important implications for surgical planning.
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that affect the time required for CS localization via MSSEP PRT.
METHODS: Multivariate Cox regression analysis, applied in 100 consecutive cases of perirolandic surgery at a single institution from 2005 to 2010, during which CS localization was attempted via a standardized MSSEP PRT.
RESULTS: The CS was reliably identified in 77 cases. The mean time to identification was 5 minutes (SD = 5; range, 1-20 minutes). Lesion location either very close to the CS (within the postcentral gyrus) or at an intermediate distance (with edema extending very close to the CS) independently decreased the rate at which the CS was identified by 73% (hazard ratio: 0.27, P < .001) and 55% (hazard ratio: 0.45, P = .007), respectively. Highly destructive pathology reduced this rate by 42% (hazard ratio: 0.58, P = .03), after adjusting for other important factors. Epidural recording, age, and the presence of a burst suppression pattern on the electroencephalogram had no effect.
CONCLUSION: MSSEP PRT is an effective method for CS identification and only marginally lengthens the operative time. However, difficulty in CS localization can be expected in the presence of postcentral gyrus lesions, edema distorting perirolandic anatomy, and with highly destructive pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23381491     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182897447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  4 in total

1.  Chronic embedded cortico-thalamic closed-loop deep brain stimulation for the treatment of essential tremor.

Authors:  Enrico Opri; Stephanie Cernera; Rene Molina; Robert S Eisinger; Jackson N Cagle; Leonardo Almeida; Timothy Denison; Michael S Okun; Kelly D Foote; Aysegul Gunduz
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Automated intraoperative central sulcus localization and somatotopic mapping using median nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Tao Xie; Zehan Wu; Gerwin Schalk; Yusheng Tong; Alessandro Vato; Nataly Raviv; Qinglong Guo; Huanpeng Ye; Xinjun Sheng; Xiangyang Zhu; Peter Brunner; Liang Chen
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Neuromagnetic responses to tactile stimulation of the fingers: Evidence for reduced cortical inhibition for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and children with epilepsy.

Authors:  William Gaetz; Michael T Jurkiewicz; Sudha Kilaru Kessler; Lisa Blaskey; Erin S Schwartz; Timothy P L Roberts
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.881

4.  Unsupervised machine learning can delineate central sulcus by using the spatiotemporal characteristic of somatosensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Priscella Asman; Sujit Prabhu; Dhiego Bastos; Sudhakar Tummala; Shreyas Bhavsar; Thomas Michael McHugh; Nuri Firat Ince
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 5.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.