Literature DB >> 2338106

Assessment of nausea.

A Del Favero1, F Roila, C Basurto, V Minotti, E Ballatori, L Patoia, M Tonato, G Tognoni.   

Abstract

In a standardized way three different methods of measuring nausea have been assessed in 849 patients enrolled in 4 double blind, randomized, clinical trials, and 2 observational studies. Nausea was measured before and 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours after cancer chemotherapy by using a discrete scale (DS), a visual analogue scale (VAS) and a continuous chromatic analogue scale (ACCS), and it was evaluated according to 4 different dimensions: maximal intensity (MI) entity (E) duration (D) and quantity (Q). The distributions of nausea measurements in the population, agreement between the scales and their sensitivity, and agreement between dimensions and their sensitivity were analyzed. A uniform distribution of nausea measurements was found only in patients receiving chemotherapy without any antiemetic treatment. There was substantial equivalence of the different scales, and no advantage was shown an using an analogue (VAS) than a discrete (DS) scale. A trend toward increasing sensitivity in detecting differences as the dimensions of nausea considered became more inclusive of the various aspects of this symptom (Q more sensible than E more sensible than MI) was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2338106     DOI: 10.1007/bf00265968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  10 in total

1.  Antiemetic studies: a methodological discussion.

Authors:  I N Olver; R M Simon; J Aisner
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1986-05

2.  Reassessment of verbal and visual analog ratings in analgesic studies.

Authors:  G S Littman; B R Walker; B E Schneider
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Antiemetic activity of two different high doses of metoclopramide in cisplatin-treated cancer patients: a randomized double-blind trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research.

Authors:  F Roila; M Tonato; C Basurto; R Canaletti; D Morsia; R Passalacqua; F DiCostanzo; D Donati; N Colombo; E Ballatori
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1985-12

4.  Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale.

Authors:  Edgar E Ohnhaus; Rolf Adler
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Analogue chromatic continuous scale (ACCS): a new method for pain assessment.

Authors:  E Grossi; C Borghi; E L Cerchiari; T Della Puppa; B Francucci
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  1983 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 4.473

6.  Lorazepam: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study of a new antiemetic in patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy and prochlorperazine.

Authors:  J F Bishop; I N Olver; M M Wolf; J P Matthews; M Long; J Bingham; B L Hillcoat; I A Cooper
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Methodology in behavioral and psychosocial cancer research. The assessment of nausea and vomiting. Past problems, current issues and suggestions for future research.

Authors:  G R Morrow
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Antiemetic activity of high doses of metoclopramide combined with methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide alone in cisplatin-treated cancer patients: a randomized double-blind trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research.

Authors:  F Roila; M Tonato; C Basurto; M Bella; R Passalacqua; D Morsia; F DiCostanzo; D Donati; E Ballatori; G Tognoni
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Double-blind controlled trial of the antiemetic efficacy and toxicity of methylprednisolone (MP), metoclopramide (MTC) and domperidone (DMP) in breast cancer patients treated with i.v. CMF.

Authors:  F Roila; M Tonato; C Basurto; V Minotti; E Ballatori; A del Favero
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-06

10.  Protection from nausea and vomiting in cisplatin-treated patients: high-dose metoclopramide combined with methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide combined with dexamethasone and diphenhydramine: a study of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research.

Authors:  F Roila; M Tonato; C Basurto; M Picciafuoco; S Bracarda; D Donati; P Malacarne; L Monici; F Di Costanzo; L Patoia
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 44.544

  10 in total
  11 in total

1.  Issues in the measurement of nausea.

Authors:  A Del Favero; M Tonato; F Roila
Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1992-12

Review 2.  Positive evidence for P6 acupuncture antiemesis.

Authors:  J W Dundee; C McMillan
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 3.  A systematic review of methodologies, endpoints, and outcome measures in randomized trials of radiation therapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  Kristopher Dennis; Rehana Jamani; Clare McGrath; Leila Makhani; Henry Lam; Patrick Bauer; Carlo De Angelis; Natalie Coburn; C Shun Wong; Edward Chow
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Methodological issues in antiemetic studies.

Authors:  M Aapro
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  Palonosetron exhibits higher total control rate compared to first-generation serotonin antagonists and improves appetite in delayed-phase chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  Hiroki Ueda; Chigusa Shimono; Tomoyasu Nishimura; Megumi Shimamoto; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-20

6.  A qualitative study investigating chemotherapy-induced nausea as a symptom cluster.

Authors:  Ian N Olver; Jaklin A Eliott; Bogda Koczwara
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 7.  Methodology of trials with antiemetics.

Authors:  M Tonato; F Roila; A Del Favero; E Ballatori
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Methodology and assessment in clinical anti-emetic research: a meta-analysis of outcome parameters.

Authors:  G R Morrow
Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1992-12

9.  Efficacy of palonosetron plus aprepitant in preventing chemoradiotherapy-induced nausea and emesis in patients receiving daily low-dose cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer: a phase II study.

Authors:  Shinsuke Hanawa; Akira Mitsuhashi; Ayumu Matsuoka; Kyoko Nishikimi; Shinichi Tate; Hirokazu Usui; Takashi Uno; Makio Shozu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 10.  Options for the prevention and management of acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in children.

Authors:  L Lee Dupuis; Paul C Nathan
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.022

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.