PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to use intracerebral microdialysis (ICMD) to determine the neuropharmacokinetics of bafetinib, a dual BCR-Abl/Lyn tyrosine kinase inhibitor that may have activity against gliomas. METHODS: A microdialysis catheter was placed into either peritumoural or enhancing brain tissue of seven patients at the time of tumour resection or biopsy. Twenty-four hours later, bafetinib was administered, 240 or 360 mg po, repeating the same dose 12 h later. Dialysate samples were continuously collected for 24h, with plasma samples obtained in parallel. One to two weeks after finishing ICMD, patients were allowed to resume taking bafetinib continuously while being observed for toxicity and tumour response. RESULTS: Twenty-six dialysate samples per patient were collected (n=6) and analysed for bafetinib by tandem mass spectrometry. Bafetinib concentrations in the brain were below the lower limit of detection of the assay (0.1 ng/ml) in all samples except one from a single subject that was 0.52 ng/ml. The mean plasma bafetinib maximum concentrations after dose 1 and 2 were 143±99 and 247±73 ng/ml, respectively. Only one patient remained on treatment past two cycles, and no radiographic responses were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Bafetinib does not sufficiently cross intact or disrupted blood-brain barrier, and therefore, systemic administration of bafetinib is not recommended when investigating this drug as a treatment for brain tumours. ICMD can be a valuable research tool in early drug development. Lead-in ICMD studies can be performed relatively quickly, requiring only a small number of patients, and without significantly disrupting standard cancer care.
PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to use intracerebral microdialysis (ICMD) to determine the neuropharmacokinetics of bafetinib, a dual BCR-Abl/Lyn tyrosine kinase inhibitor that may have activity against gliomas. METHODS: A microdialysis catheter was placed into either peritumoural or enhancing brain tissue of seven patients at the time of tumour resection or biopsy. Twenty-four hours later, bafetinib was administered, 240 or 360 mg po, repeating the same dose 12 h later. Dialysate samples were continuously collected for 24h, with plasma samples obtained in parallel. One to two weeks after finishing ICMD, patients were allowed to resume taking bafetinib continuously while being observed for toxicity and tumour response. RESULTS: Twenty-six dialysate samples per patient were collected (n=6) and analysed for bafetinib by tandem mass spectrometry. Bafetinib concentrations in the brain were below the lower limit of detection of the assay (0.1 ng/ml) in all samples except one from a single subject that was 0.52 ng/ml. The mean plasma bafetinib maximum concentrations after dose 1 and 2 were 143±99 and 247±73 ng/ml, respectively. Only one patient remained on treatment past two cycles, and no radiographic responses were seen. CONCLUSIONS:Bafetinib does not sufficiently cross intact or disrupted blood-brain barrier, and therefore, systemic administration of bafetinib is not recommended when investigating this drug as a treatment for brain tumours. ICMD can be a valuable research tool in early drug development. Lead-in ICMD studies can be performed relatively quickly, requiring only a small number of patients, and without significantly disrupting standard cancer care.
Authors: Michelle R Stettner; Wenquan Wang; L Burton Nabors; Suman Bharara; Daniel C Flynn; J Robert Grammer; G Yancey Gillespie; Candece L Gladson Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-07-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Annick Desjardins; Jennifer A Quinn; James J Vredenburgh; Sith Sathornsumetee; Allan H Friedman; James E Herndon; Roger E McLendon; James M Provenzale; Jeremy N Rich; John H Sampson; Sridharan Gururangan; Jeannette M Dowell; August Salvado; Henry S Friedman; David A Reardon Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2007-01-24 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Philipp le Coutre; Karl-Anton Kreuzer; Stefan Pursche; Malte v Bonin; Traugott Leopold; Gökben Baskaynak; Bernd Dörken; Gerhard Ehninger; Oliver Ottmann; Andreas Jenke; Martin Bornhäuser; Eberhard Schleyer Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2003-12-05 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Eric Raymond; Alba A Brandes; Christian Dittrich; Pierre Fumoleau; Bruno Coudert; Paul M J Clement; Marc Frenay; Roy Rampling; Roger Stupp; Johan M Kros; Michael C Heinrich; Thierry Gorlia; Denis Lacombe; Martin J van den Bent Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kan V Lu; Shaojun Zhu; Anna Cvrljevic; Tiffany T Huang; Shawn Sarkaria; David Ahkavan; Julie Dang; Eduard B Dinca; Seema B Plaisier; Isaac Oderberg; Yohan Lee; Zugen Chen; Jeremy S Caldwell; Yongmin Xie; Joseph A Loo; David Seligson; Arnab Chakravari; Francis Y Lee; Roberto Weinmann; Timothy F Cloughesy; Stanley F Nelson; Gabriele Bergers; Thomas Graeber; Frank B Furnari; C David James; Webster K Cavenee; Terrance G Johns; Paul S Mischel Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-08-18 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: D A Reardon; G Dresemann; S Taillibert; M Campone; M van den Bent; P Clement; E Blomquist; L Gordower; H Schultz; J Raizer; P Hau; J Easaw; M Gil; J Tonn; A Gijtenbeek; U Schlegel; P Bergstrom; S Green; A Weir; Z Nikolova Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-11-10 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Jana Portnow; Behnam Badie; Xueli Liu; Paul Frankel; Shu Mi; Mike Chen; Timothy W Synold Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-03-15 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Jana Portnow; Timothy W Synold; Behnam Badie; Revathiswari Tirughana; Simon F Lacey; Massimo D'Apuzzo; Marianne Z Metz; Joseph Najbauer; Victoria Bedell; Tien Vo; Margarita Gutova; Paul Frankel; Mike Chen; Karen S Aboody Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Sadhana Jackson; Jon Weingart; Edjah K Nduom; Thura T Harfi; Richard T George; Dorothea McAreavey; Xiaobu Ye; Nicole M Anders; Cody Peer; William D Figg; Mark Gilbert; Michelle A Rudek; Stuart A Grossman Journal: Fluids Barriers CNS Date: 2018-01-15