Literature DB >> 23380232

Exploration versus exploitation in polydomous ant colonies.

Zoe Cook1, Daniel W Franks, Elva J H Robinson.   

Abstract

In socially foraging species resource information can be shared between individuals, increasing foraging success. In ant colonies, nestmate recruitment allows high exploitation rates at known resources however, to maximise foraging efficiency this must be balanced with searching for new resources. Many ant species form colonies inhabiting two or more spatially separated but socially connected nests: this type of organisation is known as polydomy. Polydomous colonies may benefit from increased foraging efficiency by carrying out dispersed-central place foraging. However, decentralisation of the colony may affect recruitment success by limiting interaction between ants based in separate nests. We use an agent-based model which compares the foraging success of monodomous and polydomous colonies in different food environments, incorporating recruitment through pheromone trails and group foraging. In contrast to previous results we show that polydomy is beneficial in some but not all cases. Polydomous colonies discover resources at a higher rate, making them more successful when food is highly dispersed, but their relative success can be lowered by limitations on recruitment success. Monodomous colonies can have higher foraging efficiency than polydomous colonies by exploiting food more rapidly. The results show the importance of interactions between recruitment strategy, colony size, and colony organisation.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23380232     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.01.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  10 in total

1.  Dopaminergic modulation of the exploration/exploitation trade-off in human decision-making.

Authors:  Karima Chakroun; David Mathar; Antonius Wiehler; Florian Ganzer; Jan Peters
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Deconstructing sociality: the types of social connections that predict longevity in a group-living primate.

Authors:  Samuel Ellis; Noah Snyder-Mackler; Angelina Ruiz-Lambides; Michael L Platt; Lauren J N Brent
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Polydomy enhances foraging performance in ant colonies.

Authors:  N Stroeymeyt; P Joye; L Keller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Does cooperation mean kinship between spatially discrete ant nests?

Authors:  Duncan S Procter; Joan E Cottrell; Kevin Watts; Stuart W A'Hara; Michael Hofreiter; Elva J H Robinson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Ecological consequences of colony structure in dynamic ant nest networks.

Authors:  Samuel Ellis; Daniel W Franks; Elva J H Robinson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  The costs and benefits of decentralization and centralization of ant colonies.

Authors:  Dominic D R Burns; Jon W Pitchford; Catherine L Parr; Daniel W Franks; Elva J H Robinson
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.671

7.  Nest Entrances, Spatial Fidelity, and Foraging Patterns in the Red Ant Myrmica rubra: A Field and Theoretical Study.

Authors:  Marine Lehue; Claire Detrain; Bertrand Collignon
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 2.769

8.  Resource redistribution in polydomous ant nest networks: local or global?

Authors:  Samuel Ellis; Daniel W Franks; Elva J H Robinson
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.671

9.  Internest food sharing within wood ant colonies: resource redistribution behavior in a complex system.

Authors:  Samuel Ellis; Elva J H Robinson
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.671

10.  Foraging movements are density-independent among straw-coloured fruit bats.

Authors:  María C Calderón-Capote; Dina K N Dechmann; Jakob Fahr; Martin Wikelski; Roland Kays; M Teague O'Mara
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.963

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.