Literature DB >> 23380106

Time to antibiotics for septic shock: evaluating a proposed performance measure.

Arjun K Venkatesh1, Umakanth Avula, Holly Bartimus, Justin Reif, Michael J Schmidt, Emilie S Powell.   

Abstract

PURPOSES: International guidelines recommend antibiotics within 1 hour of septic shock recognition; however, a recently proposed performance measure is focused on measuring antibiotic administration within 3 hours of emergency department (ED) arrival. Our objective was to describe the time course of septic shock and subsequent implications for performance measurement. BASIC PROCEDURES: Cross-sectional study of consecutive ED patients ultimately diagnosed with septic shock. All patients were evaluated at an urban, academic ED in 2006 to 2008. Primary outcomes included time to definition of septic shock and performance on 2 measures: antibiotics within 3 hours of ED arrival vs antibiotics within 1 hour of septic shock definition. MAIN
FINDINGS: Of 267 patients with septic shock, the median time to definition was 88 minutes (interquartile range, 37-156), and 217 patients (81.9%) met the definition within 3 hours of arrival. Of 221 (83.4%) of patients who received antibiotics within 3 hours of arrival, 38 (17.2%) did not receive antibiotics within 1 hour of definition. Of 207 patients who received antibiotics within 1 hour of definition, 11.6% (n = 24) did not receive antibiotics within 3 hours of arrival. The arrival measure did not accurately classify performance in 23.4% of patients. PRINCIPAL
CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 1 of 5 patients cannot be captured for performance measurement within 3 hours of ED arrival due to the variable progression of septic shock. Use of this measure would misclassify performance in 23% of patients. Measuring antibiotic administration based on the clinical course of septic shock rather than from ED arrival would be more appropriate.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23380106     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  4 in total

1.  Enabling a Learning Health System through a Unified Enterprise Data Warehouse: The Experience of the Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Sciences (NUCATS) Institute.

Authors:  Justin B Starren; Andrew Q Winter; Donald M Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 4.689

Review 2.  The Impact of Timing of Antibiotics on Outcomes in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sarah A Sterling; W Ryan Miller; Jason Pryor; Michael A Puskarich; Alan E Jones
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Adequate antibiotic therapy prior to ICU admission in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock reduces hospital mortality.

Authors:  José Garnacho-Montero; Antonio Gutiérrez-Pizarraya; Ana Escoresca-Ortega; Esperanza Fernández-Delgado; José María López-Sánchez
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Bloodstream infections, antibiotic resistance and the practice of blood culture sampling in Germany: study design of a Thuringia-wide prospective population-based study (AlertsNet).

Authors:  André Karch; Roland P Schmitz; Florian Rißner; Stefanie Castell; Sandra Töpel; Matthias Jakob; Frank M Brunkhorst; Rafael T Mikolajczyk
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.