Literature DB >> 23379674

Risk-sensitive allocation in seasonal dynamics of fat and protein reserves in a long-lived mammal.

Kevin L Monteith1, Thomas R Stephenson, Vernon C Bleich, Mary M Conner, Becky M Pierce, R Terry Bowyer.   

Abstract

Body reserves of numerous taxa follow seasonal rhythms that are a function of temporal patterns in food availability and life-history events; however, tests of the theory underlying the allocation of somatic reserves for long-lived organisms are rare, especially for free-ranging mammals. We evaluated the hypothesis that allocation of somatic reserves to survival (i.e., metabolic processes) and reproduction should be sensitive to current nutritional state relative to seasonal thresholds in those reserves. Our goal was to reveal the linkages between nutrition and life-history traits to understand how long-lived, iteroparous organisms balance the allocation of somatic reserves to reproduction, while retaining reserves as insurance for survival in unpredictable environments. Our evaluation was based on seasonal dynamics in fat (measured as ingesta-free body fat; IFBFat) and protein reserves (measured as ingesta-free, fat-free body mass; IFFFBMass) of 136 female mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) over 8 years. Although mean changes in fat and protein reserves were positive over summer and negative over winter, accretion and catabolism of those reserves was not consistent among individuals. Over winter, both lipid and protein stores available in autumn were catabolized in proportion to their availability above a post-winter threshold (5·8% IFBFat, 33 kg IFFFBMass); however, lean body tissue was spared at the expense of lipid reserves. Female deer mostly synthesized lean body tissue over summer and committed post-winter fat reserves to reproduction relative to their availability above an autumn threshold (>8·6% IFBFat), which was lowered by 2·8 percentage points (pp) for each additional young recruited. Mothers reduced their autumn fat threshold to secure current reproductive investment and, thereby, endured a cost of reproduction at the expense of fat accumulation. Allocation of somatic reserves occurred in a risk-sensitive framework; females allocated reserves relative to their availability above seasonal thresholds. In contrast to current notions of summer accretion and winter catabolism of body reserves, some individuals deposited reserves over winter and catabolized reserves over summer, mainly because regulation of individual condition was state-dependent. Consequently, behaviour and life-history strategies may be as much a function of nutritional contributions of the previous season as of the current one.
© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  California; Sierra Nevada; carry‐over effects, compensation; cost of reproduction; life‐history strategies; mule deer; nutritional condition; recruitment; trade‐offs

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23379674     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  21 in total

1.  Behaviour influences thermoregulation of boreal moose during the warm season.

Authors:  Daniel P Thompson; John A Crouse; Perry S Barboza; Miles O Spathelf; Andrew M Herberg; Stephanie D Parker; Max A Morris
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.079

2.  Effects of climate and plant phenology on recruitment of moose at the southern extent of their range.

Authors:  Kevin L Monteith; Robert W Klaver; Kent R Hersey; A Andrew Holland; Timothy P Thomas; Matthew J Kauffman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Linking habitat selection to fitness-related traits in herbivores: the role of the energy landscape.

Authors:  Ryan A Long; R T Bowyer; Warren P Porter; Paul Mathewson; Kevin L Monteith; Scott L Findholt; Brian L Dick; John G Kie
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Birth date promotes a tortoise or hare tactic for body mass development of a long-lived male ungulate.

Authors:  Eric S Michel; Stephen Demarais; Bronson K Strickland; Guiming Wang
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Investment in constitutive immune function by North American elk experimentally maintained at two different population densities.

Authors:  Cynthia J Downs; Kelley M Stewart; Brian L Dick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Biological and environmental influences on parturition date and birth mass of a seasonal breeder.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolcott; Ryan L Reitz; Floyd W Weckerly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Fine-scale genetic correlates to condition and migration in a wild cervid.

Authors:  Joseph M Northrup; Aaron B A Shafer; Charles R Anderson; David W Coltman; George Wittemyer
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.183

8.  Climate change is the primary driver of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) range expansion at the northern extent of its range; land use is secondary.

Authors:  Kimberly L Dawe; Stan Boutin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Risk-sensitive reproductive allocation: fitness consequences of body mass losses in two contrasting environments.

Authors:  Bård-Jørgen Bårdsen; Marius Warg Næss; Torkild Tveraa; Knut Langeland; Per Fauchald
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Functional analysis of normalized difference vegetation index curves reveals overwinter mule deer survival is driven by both spring and autumn phenology.

Authors:  Mark A Hurley; Mark Hebblewhite; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Stéphane Dray; Kyle A Taylor; W K Smith; Pete Zager; Christophe Bonenfant
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.