Literature DB >> 23378703

Chemical peels and fillers-incorporating scientific evidence in clinical practice.

Rashmi Sarkar1, Jaishree Sharad, Maya Vedamurthy.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23378703      PMCID: PMC3560161          DOI: 10.4103/0974-2077.104909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 0974-2077


× No keyword cloud information.
Chemical peeling is perhaps the most commonly performed cosmetological office procedure. Although newer rejuvenating procedures and devices arrive frequently, chemical peels have withstood the test of time for various dermatological indications. A sound knowledge of the skin type, indication, type of chemical peels used, good pre-peel and post-peel care in the hands of a good dermatologist are important in accomplishing good results. It is most important to incorporate scientific evidence inaesthetic practice and this special issue on ‘Chemical Peels and Fillers’ attempts to address this in Asian and dark-skinned patients. Acne and acne scars are an important indication for treatment with chemical peels. In the review article by Handog et al., the authors attempt to present the results of chemical peels used in acne and acne scars in Asians and surprisingly, very few studies exist for this particular population in the literature. They concluded that chemical peels were good adjuvants for treatment of acne and acne scars, especially 30% salicylic acid and 35-70% glycolic acid for both inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions of acne.[1] Elsewhere in the issue, Sarkar et al. review chemical peels for melasma in dark-skinned patients.[2] Scientific evidence points out that in spite of its wide usage in dermatological and aesthetic practice, chemical peels at best remain second-line or adjunct treatment for melasma with or without combination with skin-lightening agents. Scientific literature surprisingly does not have many studies on treatment of freckles and the issue offers a scientific split face study comparing 70% phenol peels with 80% trichloro-acetic acid peels for freckles by Mradula et al.[3] The authors point out that both the agents appeared promising for treatment of freckles. Dermal fillers are the third most common cosmetological procedure performed in the west to correct dermatological conditions like lip augmentation, fine lines to deeper nasolabial folds and volume correction of the cheeks.[4] While treating dark-skinned patients, it is important to keep the goal according to the patient's expectations and to understand what is culturally acceptable to them and what they really desire, while trying to avoid every complication. Periorbital pigmentation requires a multidisciplinary approach to treat it, and Sharad discusses treatment of tear trough defect with hyaluronic acid fillers, which help in correcting periorbital pigmentation.[5] This is less invasive with minimum downtime. The author stresses that over correction, too-superficial injections and choice of inappropriate fillers may lead to bad aesthetic results.
  4 in total

1.  A Split-face Comparative Study of 70% Trichloroacetic Acid and 80% Phenol Spot Peel in the Treatment of Freckles.

Authors:  P R Mradula; S Sacchidanand
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2012-10

2.  Dermal Fillers for the Treatment of Tear Trough Deformity: A Review of Anatomy, Treatment Techniques, and their Outcomes.

Authors:  Jaishree Sharad
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2012-10

3.  Chemical peels for melasma in dark-skinned patients.

Authors:  Rashmi Sarkar; Shuchi Bansal; Vijay K Garg
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2012-10

4.  Chemical peels for acne and acne scars in asians: evidence based review.

Authors:  Evangeline B Handog; Maria Suzanne L Datuin; Ivan A Singzon
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2012-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.