BACKGROUND:Compliance and persistence are often overlooked in adjuvant breast cancer treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PACT was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open, parallel-group study assessing whether educational materials (EMs) enhanced compliance with aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy in postmenopausal women with early, hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. The primary end points were compliance (proportion taking ≥ 80% anastrozole) at 12 months and persistence (proportion reporting anastrozole intake during the study period). RESULTS:Four thousand eight hundred and forty-four patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive standard therapy or standard therapy with EMs. There was no difference between arms in compliance (N = 2740; 88.5%/88.8%, respectively, P = 0.81) or persistence rates (N = 2740; 40.5%/43.0%, respectively, P = 0.18). Modified end point analyses found no differences in compliance between arms based on the classification of: (i) patients with missing documentation or follow-up visit <9 months as non-compliant (N = 4397, P = 0.15); (ii) patients with early (≤ 292 days) 12-month follow-up documentation excluded (N = 4091, P = 0.19); (iii) patients reaching ≥ 80% compliance during individual follow-up as compliant (N = 4397, P = 0.26). Modified persistence analyses found no difference between arms (N = 4397, P = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of EMs to standard therapy did not significantly affect compliance and persistence with adjuvant anastrozole. CLINICALTRIALS ID: NCT00555867.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Compliance and persistence are often overlooked in adjuvant breast cancer treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PACT was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open, parallel-group study assessing whether educational materials (EMs) enhanced compliance with aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy in postmenopausal women with early, hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. The primary end points were compliance (proportion taking ≥ 80% anastrozole) at 12 months and persistence (proportion reporting anastrozole intake during the study period). RESULTS: Four thousand eight hundred and forty-four patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive standard therapy or standard therapy with EMs. There was no difference between arms in compliance (N = 2740; 88.5%/88.8%, respectively, P = 0.81) or persistence rates (N = 2740; 40.5%/43.0%, respectively, P = 0.18). Modified end point analyses found no differences in compliance between arms based on the classification of: (i) patients with missing documentation or follow-up visit <9 months as non-compliant (N = 4397, P = 0.15); (ii) patients with early (≤ 292 days) 12-month follow-up documentation excluded (N = 4091, P = 0.19); (iii) patients reaching ≥ 80% compliance during individual follow-up as compliant (N = 4397, P = 0.26). Modified persistence analyses found no difference between arms (N = 4397, P = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of EMs to standard therapy did not significantly affect compliance and persistence with adjuvant anastrozole. CLINICALTRIALS ID: NCT00555867.
Entities:
Keywords:
adherence; anastrozole; breast cancer; compliance; endocrine therapy; persistence
Authors: P A Fasching; T Fehm; S Kellner; J de Waal; M Rezai; B Baier; G Baake; H-C Kolberg; M Guggenberger; M Warm; N Harbeck; R Würstlein; J-U Deuker; P Dall; B Richter; G Wachsmann; C Brucker; J W Siebers; N Fersis; T Kuhn; C Wolf; H-W Vollert; G-P Breitbach; W Janni; R Landthaler; A Kohls; D Rezek; T Noesslet; G Fischer; S Henschen; T Praetz; V Heyl; T Kühn; T Krauß; C Thomssen; S Kümmel; A Hohn; H Tesch; C Mundhenke; A Hein; C Rauh; C M Bayer; A Jacob; K Schmidt; E Belleville; P Hadji; D Wallwiener; E-M Grischke; M W Beckmann; S Y Brucker Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Gretchen Kimmick; Sara N Edmond; Hayden B Bosworth; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Paul K Marcom; Kimberly Blackwell; Francis J Keefe; Rebecca A Shelby Journal: Breast Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: Joseph A Greer; Nicole Amoyal; Lauren Nisotel; Joel N Fishbein; James MacDonald; Jamie Stagl; Inga Lennes; Jennifer S Temel; Steven A Safren; William F Pirl Journal: Oncologist Date: 2016-02-26
Authors: Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza; Mark L Cabling; Tania Lobo; Chiranjeev Dash; Vanessa B Sheppard Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Shoshana M Rosenberg; Keith J Petrie; Annette L Stanton; Lan Ngo; Emma Finnerty; Ann H Partridge Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Ekim Ekinci; Salima Nathoo; Thushara Korattyil; Aisha Vadhariya; Hanna A Zaghloul; Polly A Niravath; Susan M Abughosh; Meghana V Trivedi Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: P Wuensch; A Hahne; R Haidinger; K Meißler; B Tenter; C Stoll; B Senf; J Huebner Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2014-08-02 Impact factor: 4.553