BACKGROUND: The clinical need to determine the presence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations in non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) in order to make informed decisions for patient treatment has seen the widespread introduction of EGFR molecular testing in many laboratories. To ensure high-quality molecular testing and allow laboratories to externally measure the standard of the service, an external quality assessment (EQA) scheme was provided to assess the whole testing process. METHODS: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded NSCLC tumour sections were distributed to laboratories for routine EGFR molecular testing, and the genotyping accuracy, interpretation of the result and clerical accuracy of the report were independently assessed. RESULTS: Three rounds of assessment have identified many genotyping errors and have highlighted the need for external assessment and education in many testing laboratories. The main issues raised were the importance of accurate genotyping, including the use of common mutation nomenclature, clear unambiguous interpretation of the result, the impact of tumour sample assessment regarding amount of tumour being analysed and the heterogeneity of the sample on the molecular test result. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in all these areas were observed during the progression of the three EQA rounds, however, continuous unacceptably high genotyping error rates demonstrate the clear need for continual external assessment and education in this field.
BACKGROUND: The clinical need to determine the presence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations in non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) in order to make informed decisions for patient treatment has seen the widespread introduction of EGFR molecular testing in many laboratories. To ensure high-quality molecular testing and allow laboratories to externally measure the standard of the service, an external quality assessment (EQA) scheme was provided to assess the whole testing process. METHODS:Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded NSCLC tumour sections were distributed to laboratories for routine EGFR molecular testing, and the genotyping accuracy, interpretation of the result and clerical accuracy of the report were independently assessed. RESULTS: Three rounds of assessment have identified many genotyping errors and have highlighted the need for external assessment and education in many testing laboratories. The main issues raised were the importance of accurate genotyping, including the use of common mutation nomenclature, clear unambiguous interpretation of the result, the impact of tumour sample assessment regarding amount of tumour being analysed and the heterogeneity of the sample on the molecular test result. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in all these areas were observed during the progression of the three EQA rounds, however, continuous unacceptably high genotyping error rates demonstrate the clear need for continual external assessment and education in this field.
Authors: Véronique Tack; Kelly Dufraing; Zandra C Deans; Han J van Krieken; Elisabeth M C Dequeker Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2017-03-26 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Jennifer A Fairley; Melanie H Cheetham; Simon J Patton; Etienne Rouleau; Marc Denis; Elisabeth M C Dequeker; Ed Schuuring; Kaat van Casteren; Francesca Fenizia; Nicola Normanno; Zandra C Deans Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2022-07-12 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Wolfgang Wick; Michael Weller; Martin van den Bent; Marc Sanson; Markus Weiler; Andreas von Deimling; Christoph Plass; Monika Hegi; Michael Platten; Guido Reifenberger Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2014-06-10 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Hendrikus J Dubbink; Zandra C Deans; Bastiaan B J Tops; Folkert J van Kemenade; S Koljenović; Han J M van Krieken; Willeke A M Blokx; Winand N M Dinjens; Patricia J T A Groenen Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2014-03-18 Impact factor: 6.603
Authors: Jeroen R Dijkstra; Bastiaan B J Tops; Iris D Nagtegaal; J Han J M van Krieken; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2015-06-06 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: S Patton; N Normanno; F Blackhall; S Murray; K M Kerr; M Dietel; M Filipits; S Benlloch; S Popat; R Stahel; E Thunnissen Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Lien Tembuyser; Véronique Tack; Karen Zwaenepoel; Patrick Pauwels; Keith Miller; Lukas Bubendorf; Keith Kerr; Ed Schuuring; Erik Thunnissen; Elisabeth M C Dequeker Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-11-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: J Han J M Van Krieken; Etienne Rouleau; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Nicola Normanno; Scott D Patterson; Andreas Jung Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2015-11-16 Impact factor: 4.064