Literature DB >> 23378143

The Foker technique (FT) and Kimura advancement (KA) for the treatment of children with long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA): lessons learned at two European centers.

Mariusz Sroka1, Robin Wachowiak, Marcin Losin, Agnieszka Szlagatys-Sidorkiewicz, Piotr Landowski, Piotr Czauderna, John Foker, Holger Till.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We present the experiences from two European centers performing the Foker technique (FT) of esophageal lengthening by axial traction and the Kimura advancement (KA) method of lengthening the upper pouch by extrathoracic resiting a spit fistula (SF) in children with long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA, gap length > 5 cm).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 15 children were treated (8 pure EA, 6 lower tracheoesophageal fistula [TEF], and 1 upper TEF). Gaps ranged from 5 to 14 cm. Nine children already had a SF. Patients were grouped according to the presence of a SF and the subsequent surgical strategy: Group A (no SF, n = 6) received FT on both pouches. Group B (with SF, n = 6) received KA of SF and FT of the lower pouch. Group C (with SF, n = 3) received closure of the SF and subsequent Foker traction (CSFT) on both pouches.
RESULTS: Group A: Primary repairs for all six children (mean age 3 months, gap length 6.5 cm) after a mean traction time of 3 weeks and a mean of 2.1 thoracotomies (range 2 to 3). Dilations were required in three out of six for anastomotic strictures with one perforation during the second dilation. Group B: All six children (mean age 16.4 months, gap length 9.5 cm) had a primary anastomosis, although for two it was significantly delayed (48 and 143 weeks traction time) because of infections. The number of thoracotomies ranged from 2 to 8 (mean 3.6). Leaks occurred in five out of six anastomoses (responsive to conservative management). Two children developed severe strictures, which required the anastomosis to be redone. In group C (mean age 10.6 months, gap length 6.5 cm), several major complications occurred. The three SF closures leaked (one iatrogenic) causing severe mediastinitis. CSFT was successful in only one case and the other two children had an esophageal replacement (stomach, jejunum). No deaths occurred in the series.
CONCLUSION: FT of both pouches (group A) resulted in primary repairs of all six LGEA patients. The combination of KA and FT (group B) resulted in an equivalent rate of primary repairs, but with an increased number of thoracotomies and rate of complications compared with group A. CSFT (group C) resulted in a high failure rate. More data are needed (we propose a multicenter registry) to elucidate the safety and efficacy of each elongation technique and to establish an algorithm with clearer inclusion and exclusion criteria. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23378143     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1333891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0939-7248            Impact factor:   2.191


  8 in total

Review 1.  The Surgical Correction of Congenital Deformities: The Treatment of Diaphragmatic Hernia, Esophageal Atresia and Small Bowel Atresia.

Authors:  Lucas M Wessel; Jörg Fuchs; Udo Rolle
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Management of patients with combined tracheoesophageal fistula, esophageal atresia, and duodenal atresia.

Authors:  Christoph S Nabzdyk; Bill Chiu; Carl-Christian Jackson; Walter J Chwals
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2014-11-06

3.  Evaluation of Bilayer Silk Fibroin Grafts for Tubular Esophagoplasty in a Porcine Defect Model.

Authors:  Gokhan Gundogdu; Duncan Morhardt; Vivian Cristofaro; Khalid Algarrahi; Xuehui Yang; Kyle Costa; Cinthia Galvez Alegria; Maryrose P Sullivan; Joshua R Mauney
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Thoracoscopic traction technique in long gap esophageal atresia: entering a new era.

Authors:  David C van der Zee; Gabriele Gallo; Stefaan H A Tytgat
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Anastomotic Strictures after Esophageal Atresia Repair: Incidence, Investigations, and Management, Including Treatment of Refractory and Recurrent Strictures.

Authors:  Renato Tambucci; Giulia Angelino; Paola De Angelis; Filippo Torroni; Tamara Caldaro; Valerio Balassone; Anna Chiara Contini; Erminia Romeo; Francesca Rea; Simona Faraci; Giovanni Federici di Abriola; Luigi Dall'Oglio
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.418

6.  Esophageal Trachea, a Unique Foregut Malformation Requiring Multistage Surgical Reconstruction: Case Report.

Authors:  Roberto Tambucci; Océane Wautelet; Astrid Haenecour; Geneviève François; Christophe Goubau; Isabelle Scheers; Marin Halut; Renaud Menten; Sandra Schmitz; Caroline de Toeuf; Thierry Pirotte; Beelke D'hondt; Raymond Reding; Alain Poncelet
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 3.418

7.  Favorable Outcome of Electively Delayed Elongation Procedure in Long-Gap Esophageal Atresia.

Authors:  Diez H Oliver; Sidler Martin; Diez-Mendiondo I Belkis; Wessel M Lucas; Loff Steffan
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-07-06

Review 8.  Esophageal replacement in children: Challenges and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Giampiero Soccorso; Dakshesh H Parikh
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.