PURPOSE: Recognition of the complex, multidimensional relationship between excess adiposity and cancer control outcomes has motivated the scientific community to seek new research models and paradigms. METHODS: The National Cancer Institute developed an innovative concept to establish a center grant mechanism in nutrition, energetics, and physical activity, referred to as the Transdisciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer (TREC) Initiative. This paper gives an overview of the 2011-2016 TREC Collaborative Network and the 15 research projects being conducted at the centers. RESULTS: Four academic institutions were awarded TREC center grants in 2011: Harvard University, University of California San Diego, University of Pennsylvania, and Washington University in St. Louis. The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center is the Coordination Center. The TREC research portfolio includes three animal studies, three cohort studies, four randomized clinical trials, one cross-sectional study, and two modeling studies. Disciplines represented by TREC investigators include basic science, endocrinology, epidemiology, biostatistics, behavior, medicine, nutrition, physical activity, genetics, engineering, health economics, and computer science. Approximately 41,000 participants will be involved in these studies, including children, healthy adults, and breast and prostate cancer survivors. Outcomes include biomarkers of cancer risk, changes in weight and physical activity, persistent adverse treatment effects (e.g., lymphedema, urinary and sexual function), and breast and prostate cancer mortality. CONCLUSION: The NIH Science of Team Science group will evaluate the value added by this collaborative science. However, the most important outcome will be whether this transdisciplinary initiative improves the health of Americans at risk of cancer as well as cancer survivors.
PURPOSE: Recognition of the complex, multidimensional relationship between excess adiposity and cancer control outcomes has motivated the scientific community to seek new research models and paradigms. METHODS: The National Cancer Institute developed an innovative concept to establish a center grant mechanism in nutrition, energetics, and physical activity, referred to as the Transdisciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer (TREC) Initiative. This paper gives an overview of the 2011-2016 TREC Collaborative Network and the 15 research projects being conducted at the centers. RESULTS: Four academic institutions were awarded TREC center grants in 2011: Harvard University, University of California San Diego, University of Pennsylvania, and Washington University in St. Louis. The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center is the Coordination Center. The TREC research portfolio includes three animal studies, three cohort studies, four randomized clinical trials, one cross-sectional study, and two modeling studies. Disciplines represented by TREC investigators include basic science, endocrinology, epidemiology, biostatistics, behavior, medicine, nutrition, physical activity, genetics, engineering, health economics, and computer science. Approximately 41,000 participants will be involved in these studies, including children, healthy adults, and breast and prostate cancer survivors. Outcomes include biomarkers of cancer risk, changes in weight and physical activity, persistent adverse treatment effects (e.g., lymphedema, urinary and sexual function), and breast and prostate cancer mortality. CONCLUSION: The NIH Science of Team Science group will evaluate the value added by this collaborative science. However, the most important outcome will be whether this transdisciplinary initiative improves the health of Americans at risk of cancer as well as cancer survivors.
Authors: Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Sally Hunsberger; Marianne H Alciati; Steven N Blair; Pamela J Goodwin; Anne McTiernan; Rena Wing; Arthur Schatzkin Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2009-04-28 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Amanda L Vogel; Annie Feng; April Oh; Kara L Hall; Brooke A Stipelman; Daniel Stokols; Janet Okamoto; Frank M Perna; Richard Moser; Linda Nebeling Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Kara L Hall; Daniel Stokols; Brooke A Stipelman; Amanda L Vogel; Annie Feng; Beth Masimore; Glen Morgan; Richard P Moser; Stephen E Marcus; David Berrigan Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Peter James; Jaime E Hart; J Aaron Hipp; Jonathan A Mitchell; Jacqueline Kerr; Philip M Hurvitz; Karen Glanz; Francine Laden Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Renate M Winkels; Kathleen M Sturgeon; Michael J Kallan; Lorraine T Dean; Zi Zhang; Margaret Evangelisti; Justin C Brown; David B Sarwer; Andrea B Troxel; Crystal Denlinger; Monica Laudermilk; Anna Fornash; Angela DeMichele; Lewis A Chodosh; Kathryn H Schmitz Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Jonathan A Mitchell; Mirja Quante; Suneeta Godbole; Peter James; J Aaron Hipp; Catherine R Marinac; Sara Mariani; Elizabeth M Cespedes Feliciano; Karen Glanz; Francine Laden; Rui Wang; Jia Weng; Susan Redline; Jacqueline Kerr Journal: Chronobiol Int Date: 2017-06-26 Impact factor: 2.877
Authors: Deepti Adlakha; Aaron J Hipp; Christine Marx; Lin Yang; Rachel Tabak; Elizabeth A Dodson; Ross C Brownson Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Melinda L Irwin; Diana Lowry; Marian L Neuhouser; Jennifer Ligibel; Kathryn Schmitz; Ruth E Patterson; Graham Colditz; Fangyong Li; Linda Nebeling Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2021-03-16 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Damali N Martin; Tram Kim Lam; Katy Brignole; Kimlin T Ashing; William J Blot; Linda Burhansstipanov; Jarvis T Chen; Mark Dignan; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Maria Elena Martinez; Alicia Matthews; Julie R Palmer; Eliseo J Perez-Stable; Mario Schootman; Hugo Vilchis; Alexander Vu; Shobha Srinivasan Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 4.254