Literature DB >> 23377458

[Change in therapy target and therapy limitations in intensive care medicine. Position paper of the Ethics Section of the German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine].

U Janssens1, H Burchardi, G Duttge, R Erchinger, P Gretenkort, M Mohr, F Nauck, S Rothärmel, F Salomon, P Schmucker, A Simon, H Stopfkuchen, A Valentin, N Weiler, G Neitzke.   

Abstract

The task of physicians is to maintain life, to protect and re-establish health as well as to alleviate suffering and to accompany the dying until death, under consideration of the self-determination rights of patients. Increasingly more and differentiated options for this are becoming available in intensive care medicine. Within the framework of professional responsibility physicians must decide which of the available treatment options are indicated. This process of decision-making is determined by answering the following question: when and under which circumstances is induction or continuation of intensive care treatment justified? In addition to the indications, the advance directive of the patient is the deciding factor. Medical indications represent a scientifically based estimation that a therapeutic measure is suitable in order to achieve a defined therapy target with a given probability. The ascertainment of the patient directive is achieved in a graded process depending on the state of consciousness of the patient. The present article offers orientation assistance to physicians for these decisions which are an individual responsibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23377458     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-012-2126-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Intercultural competence. Management of foreignness in intensive care medicine].

Authors:  T Bein
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Indication: scientific and ethical basis of medical practice].

Authors:  G Neitzke
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 3.  [Therapy escalation for the potential organ donor : Are all intensive care measures also ethically justifiable?]

Authors:  S-O Kuhn; K Hahnenkamp
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 0.840

4.  [Non-beneficial therapy and emotional exhaustion in end-of-life care : Results of a survey among intensive care unit personnel].

Authors:  Christiane S Hartog; F Hoffmann; A Mikolajetz; S Schröder; A Michalsen; K Dey; R Riessen; U Jaschinski; M Weiss; M Ragaller; S Bercker; J Briegel; C Spies; D Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  [International guidelines of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign : update 2012].

Authors:  J Briegel; P Möhnle
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  [Withholding life-sustaining therapies-interdisciplinary responsibility].

Authors:  M Zenz
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 7.  [Patients' declared intentions and emergency medicine].

Authors:  T Wurmb; J Brederlau
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 8.  [Autonomy and welfare in intensive care medicine : Practical approach in difficult situations].

Authors:  M Gruß; F Salomon
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  [Diagnostics of irreversible brain death : Limitations and potential for improvement from the perspective of transplantation officials].

Authors:  Olaf Martin Hoffmann; Corinna Dinse; Florian Masuhr
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 10.  [Geriatric patients in the intensive care unit].

Authors:  S Schmid; K Heissner; S Schlosser; M Müller-Schilling
Journal:  Gastroenterologe       Date:  2021-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.