Literature DB >> 23376962

Automatic smoothing parameter selection in GAMLSS with an application to centile estimation.

Robert A Rigby1, Dimitrios M Stasinopoulos2.   

Abstract

A method for automatic selection of the smoothing parameters in a generalised additive model for location, scale and shape (GAMLSS) model is introduced. The method uses a P-spline representation of the smoothing terms to express them as random effect terms with an internal (or local) maximum likelihood estimation on the predictor scale of each distribution parameter to estimate its smoothing parameters. This provides a fast method for estimating multiple smoothing parameters. The method is applied to centile estimation where all four parameters of a distribution for the response variable are modelled as smooth functions of a transformed explanatory variable x This allows smooth modelling of the location, scale, skewness and kurtosis parameters of the response variable distribution as functions of x.
© The Author(s) 2013 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Box–Cox power exponential distribution; Box–Cox t distribution; P-splines; lambda–mu–sigma method; quantile estimation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23376962     DOI: 10.1177/0962280212473302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  18 in total

1.  Quantile rank maps: a new tool for understanding individual brain development.

Authors:  Huaihou Chen; Clare Kelly; F Xavier Castellanos; Ye He; Xi-Nian Zuo; Philip T Reiss
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Age- and gender-related characteristics of the pubic symphysis and triradiate cartilage in pediatric computed tomography.

Authors:  Jörg Bayer; Jakob Neubauer; Ulrich Saueressig; Norbert P Südkamp; Kilian Reising
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-08-16

3.  Growth and body composition trajectories in infants meeting the WHO growth standards study requirements.

Authors:  Efrah I Yousuf; Niels Rochow; Jenifer Li; Julia Simioni; Elizabeth Gunn; Eileen K Hutton; Katherine M Morrison
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.953

4.  Reference Values for Noninvasive Blood Pressure in Children during Anesthesia: A Multicentered Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jurgen C de Graaff; Wietze Pasma; Stef van Buuren; Jesse J Duijghuisen; Olubukola O Nafiu; Sachin Kheterpal; Wilton A van Klei
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Validity of US norms for the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-III in Malawian children.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Cromwell; Queen Dube; Stephen R Cole; Chawanangwa Chirambo; Anna E Dow; Robert S Heyderman; Annelies Van Rie
Journal:  Eur J Paediatr Neurol       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.140

6.  Design of a multi-site multi-state clinical trial of home monitoring of chronic disease in the community in Australia.

Authors:  Branko G Celler; Ross Sparks; Surya Nepal; Leila Alem; Marlien Varnfield; Jane Li; Julian Jang-Jaccard; Simon J McBride; Rajiv Jayasena
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Length Normalized Indices for Fat Mass and Fat-Free Mass in Preterm and Term Infants during the First Six Months of Life.

Authors:  Ipsita Goswami; Niels Rochow; Gerhard Fusch; Kai Liu; Michael L Marrin; Matthias Heckmann; Mathias Nelle; Christoph Fusch
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Heart Rate and Blood Pressure Centile Curves and Distributions by Age of Hospitalized Critically Ill Children.

Authors:  Danny Eytan; Andrew J Goodwin; Robert Greer; Anne-Marie Guerguerian; Peter C Laussen
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 3.418

9.  Pediatric Vital Sign Distribution Derived From a Multi-Centered Emergency Department Database.

Authors:  Robert J Sepanski; Sandip A Godambe; Arno L Zaritsky
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.418

10.  Distance and percentage distance from median BMI as alternatives to BMI z score.

Authors:  David S Freedman; Jessica G Woo; Cynthia L Ogden; Ji H Xu; Tim J Cole
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.718

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.