Literature DB >> 23376710

Predictors of secondary surgery after hypospadias repair: a population based analysis of 5,000 patients.

Olivia T Lee1, Blythe Durbin-Johnson, Eric A Kurzrock.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The literature on secondary surgery after hypospadias repair is limited. We determined risk factors for secondary surgery via a population based approach.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a hospital consortium database to identify a population that underwent hypospadias repair in 2009 and 2010. Specifically meatal advancement and glanuloplasty, distal, proximal and perineal hypospadias repairs were evaluated. Secondary surgeries performed between 2009 and 2011 were captured and the variables of age at primary surgery, insurance, region and surgeon volume were measured. Mixed effects logistic regression analysis was used to analyze independent variables associated with secondary surgery.
RESULTS: We identified 5,326 subjects who underwent primary hypospadias repair by 114 surgeons at 47 hospitals in 2009 and 2010. Distal hypospadias repair is associated with a 9% secondary surgery rate. After adjusting for other factors every additional 10 distal repairs that a surgeon performed yearly was associated with a 29% decreased risk of requiring fistula, stricture or diverticulum repair. There were regional differences for secondary surgery following meatal advancement and glanuloplasty and distal repairs. Finally, each additional year of patient age at distal repair was associated with a 15% increased risk of requiring secondary cystoscopy and a 21% increased risk of requiring urethral dilation/incision.
CONCLUSIONS: This population based study produced significantly different results than small studies of select patients and techniques. Distal hypospadias repair is associated with a 9% secondary surgery rate. Low surgeon volume independently increases the risk of fistula, stricture or diverticulum repair. Increased patient age at primary distal hypospadias repair increases the risk of cystoscopy and urethral dilation/incision.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23376710     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Distal hypospadias: Current therapeutic approach and various aspects of follow-up].

Authors:  I Rübben
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  [Complications of hypospadias repairs].

Authors:  A Soave; S Riechardt; O Engel; M Rink; M Fisch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  The association between caudal anesthesia and increased risk of postoperative surgical complications in boys undergoing hypospadias repair.

Authors:  Brad M Taicher; Jonathan C Routh; John B Eck; Sherry S Ross; John S Wiener; Allison K Ross
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 2.556

Review 4.  Current understanding of hypospadias: relevance of animal models.

Authors:  Gerald R Cunha; Adriane Sinclair; Gail Risbridger; John Hutson; Laurence S Baskin
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Outcomes after pediatric open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty at academic institutions.

Authors:  Yvonne Y Chan; Blythe Durbin-Johnson; Renea M Sturm; Eric A Kurzrock
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.830

6.  Mouse hypospadias: A critical examination and definition.

Authors:  Adriane Watkins Sinclair; Mei Cao; Joel Shen; Paul Cooke; Gail Risbridger; Laurence Baskin; Gerald R Cunha
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 3.880

7.  Values and pitfalls of the use of administrative databases for outcomes assessment.

Authors:  Emilie K Johnson; Caleb P Nelson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  [Hypospadias : Insights and challenges].

Authors:  I Rübben; R Stein
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  Diethylstilbestrol-induced mouse hypospadias: "window of susceptibility".

Authors:  Adriane Watkins Sinclair; Mei Cao; Laurence Baskin; Gerald R Cunha
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.880

10.  Role of penile biometric characteristics on surgical outcome of hypospadias repair.

Authors:  Eloísio Alexsandro da Silva; Tassia Lobountchenko; Matheus Nemer Marun; Atila Rondon; Ronaldo Damião
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 1.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.