Literature DB >> 23376437

In vitro biokinetics of chlorpromazine and the influence of different dose metrics on effect concentrations for cytotoxicity in Balb/c 3T3, Caco-2 and HepaRG cell cultures.

Jessica J W Broeders1, Bas J Blaauboer, Joop L M Hermens.   

Abstract

The extrapolation of in vitro to in vivo toxicity data is a challenge. Differences in sensitivity between cell systems may be due to intrinsic properties of the cell but also because of differences in exposure. In this study, the cytotoxicity and biokinetics of the antipsychotic chlorpromazine (CPZ) were studied in in vitro assays using different cell types and exposure conditions. Different dose metrics were assessed to express the sensitivity to CPZ. The biokinetics of CPZ were measured in cell cultures of Balb/c 3T3, Caco-2 and HepaRG cells. Cytotoxicity was measured by Alamar Blue and expressed using different dose metrics, including the nominal, measured total and measured free CPZ medium concentrations. CPZ was taken up by the cells; the highest amounts in the cell compartments were found in the Caco-2 and HepaRG cells. CPZ was highly protein-bound in the Caco-2 cell medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, resulting in lower bioavailable exposure concentrations. Moreover, also uptake into the cells strongly influenced the concentration in the medium. The Balb/c 3T3 cells were the most sensitive to the toxic effect of CPZ. The use of different dose metrics influenced the cytotoxicity results found in the three cell types. The data show that in comparing the sensitivity of the tested cell systems, the freely dissolved concentration is a more appropriate dose metric than total concentration in the medium. The ranking in sensitivity of the three cell types for CPZ was dependent on the dose metric used.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23376437     DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2013.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  4 in total

1.  The virtual cell based assay: Current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Rabea Graepel; Lara Lamon; David Asturiol; Elisabet Berggren; Elisabeth Joossens; Alicia Paini; Pilar Prieto; Maurice Whelan; Andrew Worth
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.500

2.  Induction of micronuclei by four cytostatic compounds in human hematopoietic stem cells and human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells.

Authors:  Henning Hintzsche; Gracia Montag; Helga Stopper
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  In Vitro and Clinical Safety Assessment of the Multiple W/O/W Emulsion Based on the Active Ingredients from Rosmarinus officinalis L., Avena sativa L. and Linum usitatissimum L.

Authors:  Ugne Zlabiene; Juste Baranauskaite; Dalia M Kopustinskiene; Jurga Bernatoniene
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 6.321

4.  High-throughput analysis using non-depletive SPME: challenges and applications to the determination of free and total concentrations in small sample volumes.

Authors:  Ezel Boyacı; Barbara Bojko; Nathaly Reyes-Garcés; Justen J Poole; Germán Augusto Gómez-Ríos; Alexandre Teixeira; Beate Nicol; Janusz Pawliszyn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.