Literature DB >> 23376139

An interfering dot-probe task facilitates the detection of mock crime memory in a reaction time (RT)-based concealed information test.

Xiaoqing Hu1, Angela Evans, Haiyan Wu, Kang Lee, Genyue Fu.   

Abstract

The present study aimed to test the hypothesis that an interfering task in the concealed information test will help the detection of concealed memory based on participants' behavioral performance (e.g. reaction time, error rate). Here, after participants enacted a mock crime, they were introduced to a concealed information test either with or without an interfering dot-probe task. Results showed that the RT-based pure-CIT (without interference) can detect concealed memory well above chance (AUC=.88). The detection efficiency was higher (AUC=.94) in the interference-CIT based on participants' performance of the interfering task. The findings suggested that the elevation of cognitive workload could possibly increase the detection efficiency of concealed memory based on behavioral measures.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23376139     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  10 in total

1.  The inhibitory spillover effect: Controlling the bladder makes better liars.

Authors:  Elise Fenn; Iris Blandón-Gitlin; Jennifer Coons; Catherine Pineda; Reinalyn Echon
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2015-09-11

2.  When interference helps: increasing executive load to facilitate deception detection in the concealed information test.

Authors:  George Visu-Petra; Mihai Varga; Mircea Miclea; Laura Visu-Petra
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-03-28

3.  The "good cop, bad cop" effect in the RT-based concealed information test: exploring the effect of emotional expressions displayed by a virtual investigator.

Authors:  Mihai Varga; George Visu-Petra; Mircea Miclea; Laura Visu-Petra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A reverse order interview does not aid deception detection regarding intentions.

Authors:  Elise Fenn; Mollie McGuire; Sara Langben; Iris Blandón-Gitlin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-31

5.  Memory detection 2.0: the first web-based memory detection test.

Authors:  Bennett Kleinberg; Bruno Verschuere
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Validity of the Reaction Time Concealed Information Test in a Prison Sample.

Authors:  Kristina Suchotzki; Aileen Kakavand; Matthias Gamer
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.157

7.  Speed versus accuracy instructions in the response time concealed information test.

Authors:  Till Lubczyk; Gáspár Lukács; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-01-10

8.  No effect of moderate alcohol intake on the detection of concealed identity information in the laboratory.

Authors:  Kristina Suchotzki; Heidi May; Matthias Gamer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Dispersion matters: Diagnostics and control data computer simulation in Concealed Information Test studies.

Authors:  Gáspár Lukács; Eva Specker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The mechanism of filler items in the response time concealed information test.

Authors:  Gáspár Lukács; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-01-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.