Literature DB >> 23375633

Comparison of dry-land training programs between age groups of swimmers.

Brian J Krabak1, Kyle J Hancock, Shawn Drake.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the current use of dry-land training in swimmers by age category.
DESIGN: Randomized sampling questionnaire.
SETTING: Web-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-seven coaches from swim clubs throughout the United States. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dry-land training use, frequency, duration, mode of exercise, and exercise by body region in the following groups: ≤10 years, 11-14 years, 15-18 years, collegiate, and masters swimmers (≥18 years, noncollegiate).
RESULTS: Among the surveyed coaches (n = 97), dry-land training use varied by swimmers' age (≤10 years [54%], 11-14 years [83%], 15-18 years [93%], collegiate [86%], and masters [26%]) and type of training modality (age ≤18 years [body weight exercises, stretching]; collegiate [free weight/machine weights and body weight exercises]; and masters [weight and cardiovascular training]). The most common body region exercised for all categories except masters was the spine/core, followed by the proximal leg, and then the shoulder. Masters swimmers focused on the shoulder region, followed by the spine. The primary reason for participation in dry-land training was injury prevention for all categories except masters. Limited practice time was the most common reason for not using dry-land training.
CONCLUSIONS: A total of 50%-93% of swim coaches surveyed for all groups except masters incorporated some form of dry-land training; they used body weight exercises in younger swimmers. The focus of dry-land training among swimmers ≤18 years and collegiate swimmers was the spine/core. These findings may be used to develop future studies on how dry-land training contributes to performance or injuries, especially in the younger swimmer.
Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23375633     DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PM R        ISSN: 1934-1482            Impact factor:   2.298


  5 in total

Review 1.  Strength Training in Swimming.

Authors:  Klaus Wirth; Michael Keiner; Stefan Fuhrmann; Alfred Nimmerichter; G Gregory Haff
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  EFFECTS OF A DRY-LAND STRENGTHENING PROGRAM IN COMPETITIVE ADOLESCENT SWIMMERS.

Authors:  Robert C Manske; Stephanie Lewis; Steve Wolff; Barbara Smith
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-11

3.  Sex differences in dynamic closed kinetic chain upper quarter function in collegiate swimmers.

Authors:  Robert Butler; Jennifer Arms; Michael Reiman; Phillip Plisky; Kyle Kiesel; Dean Taylor; Robin Queen
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Quality versus Quantity Debate in Swimming: Perceptions and Training Practices of Expert Swimming Coaches.

Authors:  Frank J Nugent; Thomas M Comyns; Giles D Warrington
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.193

Review 5.  Medical Care for Swimmers.

Authors:  Morteza Khodaee; George T Edelman; Jack Spittler; Randall Wilber; Brian J Krabak; Daniel Solomon; Scott Riewald; Alicia Kendig; Laura M Borgelt; Mark Riederer; Vladimir Puzovic; Scott Rodeo
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2016-07-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.