BACKGROUND: Current hypothetical models of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis emphasize the role of β-amyloid (Aβ), tau deposition, and neurodegenerative changes in the mesial temporal lobe, particularly the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus. However, many individuals with clinical AD who come to autopsy also exhibit cerebrovascular disease. The relationship between AD and vascular pathology is unclear, especially whether they represent additive and independent effects on neuronal injury. We used data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) to (1) confirm whether entorhinal cortex and hippocampal volume are associated with memory among individuals with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) who are at risk for AD; and (2) determine whether regional white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume, a radiological marker of small-vessel cerebrovascular disease, is associated with entorhinal cortex and hippocampal volume independent of putative AD biomarkers in this group. METHODS: Cognitive test scores, entorhinal cortex volume, hippocampus volume, intracranial volume, and cerebrospinal fluid-derived phosphorylated tau and Aβ1-42 protein levels were measured in 199 subjects with amnestic MCI (mean age = 74.89 ± 7.47). Lobar WMH volumes were derived from T1-, proton-density-, and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans. We examined the association between entorhinal cortex volume and cognition. Next, we examined the association of tau and Aβ1-42 with entorhinal cortex volume and between lobar WMH and entorhinal cortex volume. Finally, tau, Aβ1-42, and regional WMH volumes were entered simultaneously to predict entorhinal cortex volume. We repeated the analyses with hippocampal volume instead of entorhinal cortex volume. The analyses were also repeated with the sample restricted to those MCI patients who transitioned to AD on subsequent ADNI follow-up visits (n = 86). RESULTS: Larger entorhinal cortex volume was associated with better memory but not with performance on a task of executive functioning. Lower levels of Aβ1-42 and higher temporal WMH volumes were associated with smaller entorhinal cortex volume. When entered simultaneously, temporal lobe WMH volume was more reliably associated with entorhinal cortex volume than was Aβ1-42. The findings were similar for hippocampus volume and when the sample was restricted to MCI patients who subsequently transitioned to AD. CONCLUSIONS: The findings confirm the role of entorhinal cortex and hippocampus volume in influencing memory decline in amnestic MCI, and emphasize that even in this nominally AD prodromal condition, WMH may be influencing regional neurodegeneration.
BACKGROUND: Current hypothetical models of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis emphasize the role of β-amyloid (Aβ), tau deposition, and neurodegenerative changes in the mesial temporal lobe, particularly the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus. However, many individuals with clinical AD who come to autopsy also exhibit cerebrovascular disease. The relationship between AD and vascular pathology is unclear, especially whether they represent additive and independent effects on neuronal injury. We used data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) to (1) confirm whether entorhinal cortex and hippocampal volume are associated with memory among individuals with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) who are at risk for AD; and (2) determine whether regional white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume, a radiological marker of small-vessel cerebrovascular disease, is associated with entorhinal cortex and hippocampal volume independent of putative AD biomarkers in this group. METHODS: Cognitive test scores, entorhinal cortex volume, hippocampus volume, intracranial volume, and cerebrospinal fluid-derived phosphorylated tau and Aβ1-42 protein levels were measured in 199 subjects with amnestic MCI (mean age = 74.89 ± 7.47). Lobar WMH volumes were derived from T1-, proton-density-, and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans. We examined the association between entorhinal cortex volume and cognition. Next, we examined the association of tau and Aβ1-42 with entorhinal cortex volume and between lobar WMH and entorhinal cortex volume. Finally, tau, Aβ1-42, and regional WMH volumes were entered simultaneously to predict entorhinal cortex volume. We repeated the analyses with hippocampal volume instead of entorhinal cortex volume. The analyses were also repeated with the sample restricted to those MCI patients who transitioned to AD on subsequent ADNI follow-up visits (n = 86). RESULTS: Larger entorhinal cortex volume was associated with better memory but not with performance on a task of executive functioning. Lower levels of Aβ1-42 and higher temporal WMH volumes were associated with smaller entorhinal cortex volume. When entered simultaneously, temporal lobe WMH volume was more reliably associated with entorhinal cortex volume than was Aβ1-42. The findings were similar for hippocampus volume and when the sample was restricted to MCI patients who subsequently transitioned to AD. CONCLUSIONS: The findings confirm the role of entorhinal cortex and hippocampus volume in influencing memory decline in amnestic MCI, and emphasize that even in this nominally AD prodromal condition, WMH may be influencing regional neurodegeneration.
Authors: E C Mormino; J T Kluth; C M Madison; G D Rabinovici; S L Baker; B L Miller; R A Koeppe; C A Mathis; M W Weiner; W J Jagust Journal: Brain Date: 2008-11-28 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Anne M Fagan; Denise Head; Aarti R Shah; Daniel Marcus; Mark Mintun; John C Morris; David M Holtzman Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Leslie M Shaw; Hugo Vanderstichele; Malgorzata Knapik-Czajka; Michal Figurski; Els Coart; Kaj Blennow; Holly Soares; Adam J Simon; Piotr Lewczuk; Robert A Dean; Eric Siemers; William Potter; Virginia M-Y Lee; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2011-02-11 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: M Yoshita; E Fletcher; D Harvey; M Ortega; O Martinez; D M Mungas; B R Reed; C S DeCarli Journal: Neurology Date: 2006-12-26 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: T R Stoub; M Bulgakova; S Leurgans; D A Bennett; D Fleischman; D A Turner; L deToledo-Morrell Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-05-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Clifford R Jack; David S Knopman; William J Jagust; Leslie M Shaw; Paul S Aisen; Michael W Weiner; Ronald C Petersen; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Adam M Brickman; Frank A Provenzano; Jordan Muraskin; Jennifer J Manly; Sonja Blum; Zoltan Apa; Yaakov Stern; Truman R Brown; José A Luchsinger; Richard Mayeux Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2012-12
Authors: Wenjun Li; L Tugan Muftuler; Gang Chen; B Douglas Ward; Matthew D Budde; Jennifer L Jones; Malgorzata B Franczak; Piero G Antuono; Shi-Jiang Li; Joseph S Goveas Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2013-12-16 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Andrew M Ward; Elizabeth C Mormino; Willem Huijbers; Aaron P Schultz; Trey Hedden; Reisa A Sperling Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Costantino Iadecola; Kristine Yaffe; José Biller; Lisa C Bratzke; Frank M Faraci; Philip B Gorelick; Martha Gulati; Hooman Kamel; David S Knopman; Lenore J Launer; Jane S Saczynski; Sudha Seshadri; Adina Zeki Al Hazzouri Journal: Hypertension Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: J M G van Bergen; X Li; F C Quevenco; A F Gietl; V Treyer; R Meyer; A Buck; P A Kaufmann; R M Nitsch; P C M van Zijl; C Hock; P G Unschuld Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Alex C Birdsill; Rebecca L Koscik; Erin M Jonaitis; Sterling C Johnson; Ozioma C Okonkwo; Bruce P Hermann; Asenath Larue; Mark A Sager; Barbara B Bendlin Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 4.673