Literature DB >> 23375048

Long-term results and complications after treatment of bilateral fractures of the mandibular condyle.

Tymour Forouzanfar1, Frank Lobbezoo, Maarten Overgaauw, Annemijn de Groot, Sofie Kommers, Maurits van Selms, Bart van den Bergh.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term results of conservative treatment of bilateral condylar fractures and to study the influence of possible functional impairment on intensity of pain and associated disability. We studied 71 patients (mean (SD) age 33 (14) years) with conservatively treated bilateral condylar fractures. Traffic crashes (n=42, 59%) and falls (n=20, 28%) were the main cause of the fractures. Forty-one patients (58%) were re-examined after about 90 months (mean 86, range 3-193). Five of the 41 (12%) had developed malocclusion, but did not experience any pain in the temporomandibular joint according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. There was a significant negative relation between the presence of pain and the duration of follow up (p=0.02). Increasing age was significantly related to reduction in the intensity of pain (p=0.03). Of the remaining 30 patients who were not followed up, 2 had had bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and 1 a Le Fort I osteotomy. One patient had had orthodontic correction for a malocclusion. Including the five malocclusion patients, at least 9 of the total of 71 (13%) developed a malocclusion after conservative treatment. Functional impairment had no influence on the intensity of pain or pain-related disability in the patients with malocclusion after conservatively treated bilateral condylar fractures. This report may therefore be of value in the debate about whether open or closed treatment is better for bilateral mandibular condylar fractures.
Copyright © 2013 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic pain grade; Mandibular condylar fracture; Mandibular fracture; Posttraumatic malocclusion; Temporomandibular joint dysfunction

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23375048     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  6 in total

1.  Does Fracture Pattern Influence Functional Outcomes in the Management of Bilateral Mandibular Condylar Injuries?

Authors:  Howard D Wang; Srinivas M Susarla; Robin Yang; Gerhard S Mundinger; Benjamin D Schultz; Abhishake Banda; Alexandra MacMillan; Paul N Manson; Arthur J Nam; Amir H Dorafshar
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2018-09-21

Review 2.  Mandible Fractures.

Authors:  Brent B Pickrell; Arman T Serebrakian; Renata S Maricevich
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 3.  Long-term Complications of Isolated and Combined Condylar Fractures: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Margaux Nys; Tim Van Cleemput; Jakob Titiaan Dormaar; Constantinus Politis
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2021-06-23

4.  Let Bilateral Condylar Fracture Fixation Be the Norm and Not a Choice.

Authors:  Rohit Punga; Shivangi Gaur
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-30

5.  Long-term masticatory performance and ability following closed treatment for unilateral mandibular condylar neck or base fractures: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Florine M Weinberg; Antoine J W P Rosenberg; Barbara S Muller; Caroline M Speksnijder
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-01-23

6.  Mandibular trauma treatment: a comparison of two protocols.

Authors:  Paolo Boffano; Sofie C Kommers; Fabio Roccia; Tymour Forouzanfar
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2015-03-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.