Literature DB >> 23374842

Comparison of three types of stress urinary incontinence rat models: electrocauterization, pudendal denervation, and vaginal distension.

Sung-Hoo Hong1, Shuyu Piao, In Gul Kim, Ji Young Lee, Hyuk Jin Cho, Sae Woong Kim, Tae-Kon Hwang, Ji Youl Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the differences in the histopathologic and functional characteristics of 3 rat models of stress urinary incontinence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 24 female, 10-week-old, Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into 4 groups: normal, electrocauterization, pudendal denervation, and vaginal distension. At 2 weeks after surgery, the leak point pressure was measured to detect urinary leakage. Urethral tissue samples were collected for histological examination.
RESULTS: The smooth muscle content in the electrocauterization group was significantly decreased compared with that in all other groups, indicating that electrocauterization caused the most severe injury. A blood vessel marker, von Willebrand factor, was co-stained with α-smooth muscle actin to detect the blood vessel distribution. No significant differences were seen in von Willebrand factor expression among the 4 groups, other than in the electrocauterization group, in which we could hardly observe blood vessel expression. Protein gene product 9.5 staining was used to detect nerve fibers and cells. Protein gene product 9.5 expression was significantly lower in all the treatment groups compared with that in the normal group (P <.05), in particular, in the electrocauterization and pudendal denervation groups (P <.01). The leak point pressure was significantly lower in the electrocauterization (P <.01), pudendal denervation (P <.01), and vaginal distension (P <.05) groups than in the normal group.
CONCLUSION: The vaginal distension model should mainly be used as the myogenic damage stress urinary incontinence animal model; the pudendal denervation model mainly as the neurogenic damage stress urinary incontinence animal model; and the electrocauterization model as the vasculogenic, neurogenic, and myogenic damage animal model.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23374842     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

Review 1.  Regenerative medicine based applications to combat stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Hatim Thaker; Arun K Sharma
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 5.326

2.  Multiple doses of stem cells maintain urethral function in a model of neuromuscular injury resulting in stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Kristine Janssen; Dan Li Lin; Brett Hanzlicek; Kangli Deng; Brian M Balog; Carl H van der Vaart; Margot S Damaser
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2019-08-14

3.  Establishing and monitoring of urethral sphincter deficiency in a large animal model.

Authors:  Alexandra Kelp; Anika Albrecht; Bastian Amend; Mario Klünder; Philipp Rapp; Oliver Sawodny; Arnulf Stenzl; Wilhelm K Aicher
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Cell-based secondary prevention of childbirth-induced pelvic floor trauma.

Authors:  Geertje Callewaert; Marina Monteiro Carvalho Mori Da Cunha; Nikhil Sindhwani; Maurilio Sampaolesi; Maarten Albersen; Jan Deprest
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Local versus intravenous injections of skeletal muscle precursor cells in nonhuman primates with acute or chronic intrinsic urinary sphincter deficiency.

Authors:  J Koudy Williams; Gopal Badlani; Ashley Dean; Shannon Lankford; Kimberly Poppante; Tracy Criswell; Karl-Erik Andersson
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 6.  Molecular Processes in Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review of Human and Animal Studies.

Authors:  Wilke M Post; Joanna Widomska; Hilde Grens; Marieke J H Coenen; Frank M J Martens; Dick A W Janssen; Joanna IntHout; Geert Poelmans; Egbert Oosterwijk; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.