BACKGROUND: There are no approved pharmacotherapies for preventing psychomotor stimulant relapse. The operant reinstatement model has been suggested as a screen for identifying candidate medications. The present study examined if the anxiolytic buspirone could attenuate reinstatement of extinguished responding in Long-Evans rats that previously self-administered intravenous cocaine or methamphetamine. METHODS: Rats were trained in 2-h daily sessions to self-administer 0.5mg/kg cocaine or 0.1mg/kg methamphetamine infusions followed by 12 days of instrumental extinction. Reinstatement was evoked by 17mg/kg i.p. cocaine primes or response-contingent cocaine-paired cues in cocaine-reinforced rats, and by 1mg/kg i.p. methamphetamine primes or response-contingent methamphetamine-paired cues in methamphetamine-reinforced rats. RESULTS: Buspirone (1 and 3mg/kg) significantly (p<0.05) attenuated cocaine cue but not cocaine prime reinstatement. Buspirone (1 and 3mg/kg) also significantly attenuated methamphetamine cue reinstatement. Buspirone (3mg/kg) significantly attenuated methamphetamine prime reinstatement. During all reinstatement tests, 3mg/kg buspirone reduced levels of inactive lever pressing relative to those of vehicle, significantly so during the cocaine cue-induced reinstatement tests. CONCLUSIONS: Given the complexity of buspirone's neuropharmacology consisting of serotonin 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist activity, and dopamine D2, D3 and D4 receptor antagonist effects, it is uncertain which of these activities or their combination is responsible for the present results. Overall, these results suggest that buspirone may reduce the likelihood of relapse to cocaine and methamphetamine use under some conditions, although this speculation must be interpreted with caution given buspirone's similar potency to attenuate inactive-lever responding.
BACKGROUND: There are no approved pharmacotherapies for preventing psychomotor stimulant relapse. The operant reinstatement model has been suggested as a screen for identifying candidate medications. The present study examined if the anxiolytic buspirone could attenuate reinstatement of extinguished responding in Long-Evans rats that previously self-administered intravenous cocaine or methamphetamine. METHODS:Rats were trained in 2-h daily sessions to self-administer 0.5mg/kg cocaine or 0.1mg/kg methamphetamine infusions followed by 12 days of instrumental extinction. Reinstatement was evoked by 17mg/kg i.p. cocaine primes or response-contingent cocaine-paired cues in cocaine-reinforced rats, and by 1mg/kg i.p. methamphetamine primes or response-contingent methamphetamine-paired cues in methamphetamine-reinforced rats. RESULTS:Buspirone (1 and 3mg/kg) significantly (p<0.05) attenuated cocaine cue but not cocaine prime reinstatement. Buspirone (1 and 3mg/kg) also significantly attenuated methamphetamine cue reinstatement. Buspirone (3mg/kg) significantly attenuated methamphetamine prime reinstatement. During all reinstatement tests, 3mg/kg buspirone reduced levels of inactive lever pressing relative to those of vehicle, significantly so during the cocaine cue-induced reinstatement tests. CONCLUSIONS: Given the complexity of buspirone's neuropharmacology consisting of serotonin 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist activity, and dopamine D2, D3 and D4 receptor antagonist effects, it is uncertain which of these activities or their combination is responsible for the present results. Overall, these results suggest that buspirone may reduce the likelihood of relapse to cocaine and methamphetamine use under some conditions, although this speculation must be interpreted with caution given buspirone's similar potency to attenuate inactive-lever responding.
Authors: Jack Bergman; Rebecca A Roof; Cheryse A Furman; Jennie L Conroy; Nancy K Mello; David R Sibley; Phil Skolnick Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2012-07-25 Impact factor: 5.176
Authors: Andrea T Alleweireldt; Kenneth F Kirschner; Camille B Blake; Janet L Neisewander Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2003-01-09 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Richard W Foltin; Margaret Haney; Eric Rubin; Stephanie C Reed; Nehal Vadhan; Rebecca Balter; Suzette M Evans Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: Bernard Le Foll; Doris Payer; Patricia Di Ciano; Mihail Guranda; Shinichiro Nakajima; Junchao Tong; Esmaeil Mansouri; Alan A Wilson; Sylvain Houle; Jeff H Meyer; Ariel Graff-Guerrero; Isabelle Boileau Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2015-06-19 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: In-Jee You; Sherie R Wright; Alvaro L Garcia-Garcia; Andrew R Tapper; Paul D Gardner; George F Koob; E David Leonardo; Laura M Bohn; Sunmee Wee Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Theresa M Winhusen; Frankie Kropp; Robert Lindblad; Antoine Douaihy; Louise Haynes; Candace Hodgkins; Karen Chartier; Kyle M Kampman; Gaurav Sharma; Daniel F Lewis; Paul VanVeldhuisen; Jeff Theobald; Jeanine May; Gregory S Brigham Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Anna R Reynolds; Justin C Strickland; William W Stoops; Joshua A Lile; Craig R Rush Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 4.492