Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Standards in the face of uncertainty--peer review is flawed and under-researched, but the best we have.

× No keyword cloud information.

13 in total

1. A randomized controlled study of reviewer bias against an unconventional therapy.

Authors: K I Resch; E Ernst; J Garrow
Journal: J R Soc Med Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 5.344

2. What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?

Authors: Sara Schroter; Nick Black; Stephen Evans; Fiona Godlee; Lyda Osorio; Richard Smith
Journal: J R Soc Med Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 5.344

3. Effect of attendance at a training session on peer reviewer quality and performance.

Authors: M L Callaham; R L Wears; J F Waeckerle
Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 5.721

4. Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors: F Godlee; C R Gale; C N Martyn
Journal: JAMA Date: 1998-07-15 Impact factor: 56.272

5. Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators.

Authors: A C Justice; M K Cho; M A Winker; J A Berlin; D Rennie
Journal: JAMA Date: 1998-07-15 Impact factor: 56.272

6. Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial.

Authors: S van Rooyen; F Godlee; S Evans; N Black; R Smith
Journal: BMJ Date: 1999-01-02

7. Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care?

Authors: Richard L Kravitz; Peter Franks; Mitchell D Feldman; Martha Gerrity; Cindy Byrne; William M Tierney
Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 3.240

8. Adequacy of authors' replies to criticism raised in electronic letters to the editor: cohort study.

Authors: Peter C Gøtzsche; Tony Delamothe; Fiona Godlee; Andreas Lundh
Journal: BMJ Date: 2010-08-10

Review 9. Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies.

Authors: T Jefferson; M Rudin; S Brodney Folse; F Davidoff
Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2007-04-18

10. A reliability-generalization study of journal peer reviews: a multilevel meta-analysis of inter-rater reliability and its determinants.

Authors: Lutz Bornmann; Rüdiger Mutz; Hans-Dieter Daniel
Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-12-14 Impact factor: 3.240

2 in total

1. Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?

Authors: Aceil Al-Khatib; Jaime A Teixeira da Silva
Journal: Sci Eng Ethics Date: 2017-09-13 Impact factor: 3.525

2. Substantial agreement of referee recommendations at a general medical journal--a peer review evaluation at Deutsches Ärzteblatt International.

Authors: Christopher Baethge; Jeremy Franklin; Stephan Mertens
Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-05-02 Impact factor: 3.240

2 in total