Literature DB >> 23372585

The use of registered nurses to perform flexible sigmoidoscopy procedures in ontario: a cost minimization analysis.

Sarah E Costa1, Peter C Coyte, Audrey Laporte, Laura Quigley, Shannon Reynolds.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) are on the rise in Canada. Flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) is an initial screening test for CRC primarily used in adults aged 50 years and older at average risk for the disease. Physicians and registered nurses have been shown to have the same effectiveness in performing a FS procedure. This paper presents an analysis of the use of registered nurses (RN) compared to physicians in Ontario to assess costs to the healthcare system.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether FS performed by RNs is a less costly alternative to increase access to CRC screening capacity in Ontario.
METHODOLOGY: A cost minimization analysis was conducted from a health system perspective. DISCUSSION: RN-performed FS is a viable alternative for increasing CRC screening capacity in Ontario. Remuneration schedules for on-call physicians must be taken into consideration if policies are developed for the implementation of RN screening procedures.
RESULTS: The findings suggest that the use of RNs may be cost saving compared to physician-performed FS procedures, depending on physician remuneration.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23372585      PMCID: PMC3298026     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc Policy        ISSN: 1715-6572


  29 in total

Review 1.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy by nurses: state of the art 1999.

Authors:  P Schoenfeld; M Piorkowski; J Allaire; R Ernst; L Holmes
Journal:  Gastroenterol Nurs       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.978

Review 2.  The nurse practitioner endoscopist.

Authors:  P S Basnyat; J West; P Davies; P S Davies; M E Foster
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  A comparison of self-reported colorectal cancer screening with medical records.

Authors:  Lisa Madlensky; John McLaughlin; Vivek Goel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Colonoscopy vs sigmoidoscopy screening: getting it right.

Authors:  Alfred I Neugut; Benjamin Lebwohl
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy performed by nurses.

Authors:  P B Goodfellow
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  The promises and perils of nurse-led flexible sigmoidoscopy screening.

Authors:  Paul Moayyedi
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.522

7.  Canadian credentialing guidelines for flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  R Enns; J Romagnuolo; T Ponich; J Springer; D Armstrong; A N Barkun
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.522

8.  Economic impact of cardiovascular disease in Canada.

Authors:  B Chan; P Coyte; C Heick
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.223

9.  Accuracy of polyp detection by gastroenterologists and nurse endoscopists during flexible sigmoidoscopy: a randomized trial.

Authors:  P Schoenfeld; S Lipscomb; J Crook; J Dominguez; J Butler; L Holmes; D Cruess; D Rex
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy practice patterns in Ontario: a population-based study.

Authors:  Susan E Schultz; Chris Vinden; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.522

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening in Average Risk Patients Performed by Nurses Versus Gastroenterologists.

Authors:  Anas Makhzoum; Jacob Louw; William G Paterson
Journal:  J Can Assoc Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-02-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.