D Andreou1, H Boldt, M Werner, C Hamann, D Pink, P-U Tunn. 1. Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Sarcoma Center Berlin-Brandenburg, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin. dimosthenis.andreou@googlemail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in soft tissue sarcoma patients has yet to be determined. We sought to evaluate the role of SLNB in the treatment of patients with clear cell sarcoma (CCS), synovial sarcoma (SS), epithelioid sarcoma (ES) and rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two consecutive patients without history of regional lymphatic spread or evidence of distant metastases underwent SLNB. RESULTS: Positive sentinel nodes were identified in 2 out of 42 patients with SS and in 6 out of 12 patients with CCS. Only two CCS patients had further metastatic nodes in regional dissection. Both of these patients, along with another CCS patient, developed distant metastases and ultimately died of disease. The remaining three CCS patients are disease-free in follow-up. One patient with SS and another with ES developed regional lymph node metastases following a negative SLNB, while a further patient with RMS developed distant metastases followed by a local recurrence with regional metastases shortly after. CONCLUSIONS: SLNB is an important diagnostic tool for patients with CCS, who appear to have a high rate of clinically occult regional lymph node metastases at diagnosis. For SS patients, SLNB appears to be of very little relevance.
BACKGROUND: The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in soft tissue sarcomapatients has yet to be determined. We sought to evaluate the role of SLNB in the treatment of patients with clear cell sarcoma (CCS), synovial sarcoma (SS), epithelioid sarcoma (ES) and rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two consecutive patients without history of regional lymphatic spread or evidence of distant metastases underwent SLNB. RESULTS: Positive sentinel nodes were identified in 2 out of 42 patients with SS and in 6 out of 12 patients with CCS. Only two CCS patients had further metastatic nodes in regional dissection. Both of these patients, along with another CCS patient, developed distant metastases and ultimately died of disease. The remaining three CCS patients are disease-free in follow-up. One patient with SS and another with ES developed regional lymph node metastases following a negative SLNB, while a further patient with RMS developed distant metastases followed by a local recurrence with regional metastases shortly after. CONCLUSIONS: SLNB is an important diagnostic tool for patients with CCS, who appear to have a high rate of clinically occult regional lymph node metastases at diagnosis. For SS patients, SLNB appears to be of very little relevance.
Authors: Emily Z Keung; Yi-Ju Chiang; Rachel K Voss; Janice N Cormier; Keila E Torres; Kelly K Hunt; Barry W Feig; Christina L Roland Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: Nicholas M Siegel; Santiago A Lozano-Calderón; Jad M El Abiad; Carol D Morris; Adam S Levin Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-01-03 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Russell G Witt; Brandon Cope; Derek J Erstad; Yi-Ju Chiang; Elise F Nassif; Christopher P Scally; Keila E Torres; Kelly K Hunt; Barry W Feig; Christina L Roland; Emily Z Keung Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-04-30 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Lars H Lindner; Saskia Litière; Stefan Sleijfer; Charlotte Benson; Antoine Italiano; Bernd Kasper; Christina Messiou; Hans Gelderblom; Eva Wardelmann; Axel Le Cesne; Jean-Yves Blay; Sandrine Marreaud; Nadia Hindi; Ingrid M E Desar; Alessandro Gronchi; Winette T A van der Graaf Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2018-02-14 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Lukas M Nystrom; Nickolas B Reimer; John D Reith; Long Dang; Robert A Zlotecki; Mark T Scarborough; C Parker Gibbs Journal: ScientificWorldJournal Date: 2013-07-28