Literature DB >> 23371314

Non-completion and informed consent.

Alan Wertheimer.   

Abstract

There is a good deal of biomedical research that does not produce scientifically useful data because it fails to recruit a sufficient number of subjects. This fact is typically not disclosed to prospective subjects. In general, the guidance about consent concerns the information required to make intelligent self-interested decisions and ignores some of the information required for intelligent altruistic decisions. Bioethics has worried about the 'therapeutic misconception', but has ignored the 'completion misconception'. This article argues that, other things being equal, prospective subjects should be informed about the possibility of non-completion as part of the standard consent process if (1) it is or should be anticipatable that there is a non-trivial possibility of non-completion and (2) that information is likely to be relevant to a prospective subject's decision to consent. The article then considers several objections to the argument, including the objection that disclosing non-completion information would make recruitment even more difficult.

Keywords:  Clinical Ethics; Informed Consent; Research Ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23371314     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  6 in total

1.  When clinical trials compete: prioritising study recruitment.

Authors:  Luke Gelinas; Holly Fernandez Lynch; Barbara E Bierer; I Glenn Cohen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Using Social Media as a Research Recruitment Tool: Ethical Issues and Recommendations.

Authors:  Luke Gelinas; Robin Pierce; Sabune Winkler; I Glenn Cohen; Holly Fernandez Lynch; Barbara E Bierer
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  Frontiers: Integration of a Research Participant Registry with Medical Clinic Registration and Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Patricia M Kluding; Jo Denton; T Rene Jamison; William Brooks; Karen Blackwell; John D Lantos; Lemuel R Waitman; Tamara M McMahon; Arvinder Choudhary; Marjorie J Bott; Allen Greiner; Susan Klaus; Amy O'Brien-Ladner; Lauren S Aaronson; Jeffrey Burns; Richard Barohn
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 4.689

4.  Recruitment for exercise or physical activity interventions: a protocol for systematic review.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Hoover; Aqeel M Alenazi; Shaima Alothman; Mohammed M Alshehri; Jason Rucker; Patricia Kluding
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Ethical Issues in Social Media Recruitment for Clinical Studies: Ethical Analysis and Framework.

Authors:  Bettina M Zimmermann; Theresa Willem; Carl Justus Bredthauer; Alena Buyx
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 7.076

6.  Monitoring Twitter Conversations for Targeted Recruitment in Cancer Trials in Los Angeles County: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Pilot Study.

Authors:  Katja Reuter; Praveen Angyan; NamQuyen Le; Alicia MacLennan; Sarah Cole; Ricky N Bluthenthal; Christianne J Lane; Anthony B El-Khoueiry; Thomas A Buchanan
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2018-09-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.