Literature DB >> 23370121

Pulse pressure variation and ARDS.

J L Teboul1, X Monnet.   

Abstract

Fluid management is a crucial issue in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Assessment of preload responsiveness should help to define the best fluid strategy. Arterial pulse pressure variation (PPV), which represents the amplitude of the respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure, is considered as a marker of preload responsiveness in patients mechanically ventilated and fully adapted to their ventilator. The good ability of PPV to predict fluid responsiveness has been confirmed in various clinical situations (sepsis, operative and post-operative periods). However, there are a number of limits of using PPV (e.g., spontaneous breathing activity, cardiac arrhythmias, low tidal volume ventilation, low lung compliance), which are particularly important in ARDS. Clinical studies have confirmed the poor reliability of PPV in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients with ARDS, ventilated according to the currently recommended lung protective strategy. Although a PPV >10-12% still keeps its good predictive value, a lower PPV (<10%) is far to guarantee fluid unresponsiveness since many false-negative cases can be encountered in this setting. Thus, performance of alternative preload responsiveness tests such as passive leg raising or end-expiratory occlusion tests, is necessary when low PPV values are measured. This review addresses the meaning of PPV, its conditions of use and its limits in ARDS patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23370121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol        ISSN: 0375-9393            Impact factor:   3.051


  12 in total

1.  Heart-lung interactions, a long story with many pioneers.

Authors:  Didier Payen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-09

2.  Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on the predictability of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients.

Authors:  Yen-Huey Chen; Ying-Ju Lai; Ching-Ying Huang; Hui-Ling Lin; Chung-Chi Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Does pulse pressure variation predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaobo Yang; Bin Du
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Predicting preload responsiveness using simultaneous recordings of inferior and superior vena cavae diameters.

Authors:  Hélène Charbonneau; Béatrice Riu; Matthieu Faron; Arnaud Mari; Matt M Kurrek; Jean Ruiz; Thomas Geeraerts; Olivier Fourcade; Michèle Genestal; Stein Silva
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 5.  Use of 'tidal volume challenge' to improve the reliability of pulse pressure variation.

Authors:  Sheila Nainan Myatra; Xavier Monnet; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Evaluation of radial artery pulse pressure effects on detection of stroke volume changes after volume loading maneuvers in cardiac surgical patients.

Authors:  Jun-Yi Hou; Ji-Li Zheng; Guo-Guang Ma; Xiao-Ming Lin; Guang-Wei Hao; Ying Su; Jing-Chao Luo; Kai Liu; Zhe Luo; Guo-Wei Tu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

Review 7.  Evaluation of fluid responsiveness during COVID-19 pandemic: what are the remaining choices?

Authors:  Ahmed Hasanin; Maha Mostafa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Evaluation of volume responsiveness by pulse pressure variability and inferior vena cava dispensability index at different tidal volumes by mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Fujuan He; Xiaoqiang Li; Suman Thapa; Chi Li; Jiawei Luo; Wenyan Dai; Jin Liu
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.590

9.  Applicability of Pulse Pressure Variation during Unstable Hemodynamic Events in the Intensive Care Unit: A Five-Day Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Bertrand Delannoy; Florent Wallet; Delphine Maucort-Boulch; Mathieu Page; Mahmoud Kaaki; Mathieu Schoeffler; Brenton Alexander; Olivier Desebbe
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2016-03-31

Review 10.  Fluid responsiveness in acute circulatory failure.

Authors:  Ahmed Hasanin
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2015-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.