Literature DB >> 23369865

Metaproteome analysis of the microbial communities in agricultural biogas plants.

R Heyer1, F Kohrs, D Benndorf, E Rapp, R Kausmann, M Heiermann, M Klocke, U Reichl.   

Abstract

In biogas plants agricultural waste and energy crops are converted by complex microbial communities to methane for the production of renewable energy. In Germany, this process is widely applied namely in context of agricultural production systems. However, process disturbances, are one of the major causes for economic losses. In addition, the conversion of biomass, in particular of cellulose, is in most cases incomplete and, hence, insufficient. Besides technical aspects, a more profound characterization concerning the functionality of the microbial communities involved would strongly support the improvement of yield and stability in biogas production. To monitor these communities on the functional level, metaproteome analysis was applied in this study to full-scale agricultural biogas plants. Proteins were extracted directly from sludge for separation by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and subsequent identification with mass spectrometry. Protein profiles obtained with SDS-PAGE were specific for different biogas plants and often stable for several months. Differences of protein profiles were visualized by clustering, which allowed not only the discrimination between mesophilic and thermophilic operated biogas plants but also the detection of process disturbances such as acidification. In particular, acidification of a biogas plant was detected in advance by disappearance of major bands in SDS-PAGE. Identification of proteins from SDS-PAGE gels revealed that methyl CoM reductase, which is responsible for the release of methane during methanogenesis, from the order Methanosarcinales was significantly decreased. Hence, it is assumed that this enzyme might be a promising candidate to serve as a predictive biomarker for acidification.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23369865     DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2013.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Biotechnol        ISSN: 1871-6784            Impact factor:   5.079


  15 in total

1.  A complete and flexible workflow for metaproteomics data analysis based on MetaProteomeAnalyzer and Prophane.

Authors:  Henning Schiebenhoefer; Kay Schallert; Bernhard Y Renard; Kathrin Trappe; Emanuel Schmid; Dirk Benndorf; Katharina Riedel; Thilo Muth; Stephan Fuchs
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Identification of syntrophic acetate-oxidizing bacteria in anaerobic digesters by combined protein-based stable isotope probing and metagenomics.

Authors:  Freya Mosbæk; Henrik Kjeldal; Daniel G Mulat; Mads Albertsen; Alastair J Ward; Anders Feilberg; Jeppe L Nielsen
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Metaproteomics Applied to Activated Sludge for Industrial Wastewater Treatment Revealed a Dominant Methylotrophic Metabolism of Hyphomicrobium zavarzinii.

Authors:  Carlo Salerno; Dirk Benndorf; Sabine Kluge; Luigi Leonardo Palese; Udo Reichl; Alfieri Pollice
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 4.  Metaproteomics of complex microbial communities in biogas plants.

Authors:  Robert Heyer; Fabian Kohrs; Udo Reichl; Dirk Benndorf
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 5.813

5.  The rumen microbial metaproteome as revealed by SDS-PAGE.

Authors:  Timothy J Snelling; R John Wallace
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 3.605

6.  Metaproteomics-guided selection of targeted enzymes for bioprospecting of mixed microbial communities.

Authors:  Jutta Speda; Bengt-Harald Jonsson; Uno Carlsson; Martin Karlsson
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 6.040

7.  From grass to gas: microbiome dynamics of grass biomass acidification under mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures.

Authors:  Christian Abendroth; Claudia Simeonov; Juli Peretó; Oreto Antúnez; Raquel Gavidia; Olaf Luschnig; Manuel Porcar
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 8.  Molecular Microbial Community Analysis as an Analysis Tool for Optimal Biogas Production.

Authors:  Seyedbehnam Hashemi; Sayed Ebrahim Hashemi; Kristian M Lien; Jacob J Lamb
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-05-28

9.  Proteotyping of biogas plant microbiomes separates biogas plants according to process temperature and reactor type.

Authors:  R Heyer; D Benndorf; F Kohrs; J De Vrieze; N Boon; M Hoffmann; E Rapp; Andreas Schlüter; Alexander Sczyrba; U Reichl
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 6.040

10.  A Structural and Functional Elucidation of the Rumen Microbiome Influenced by Various Diets and Microenvironments.

Authors:  Simon Deusch; Amélia Camarinha-Silva; Jürgen Conrad; Uwe Beifuss; Markus Rodehutscord; Jana Seifert
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.